메뉴 건너뛰기
Implementation Science
Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages
Implementation Science six years on-our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;
EID: 84864210213     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-71     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (41)
References (6)
  • 1
    • 55549083502 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008, 337:979-983.
    • (2008) BMJ , vol.337 , pp. 979-983
    • Craig, P.1    Dieppe, P.2    Macintyre, S.3    Michie, S.4    Nazareth, I.5    Petticrew, M.6
  • 2
    • 47349093387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series
    • 10.1186/1748-5908-3-30, 2430586, 18510750
    • Stetler CB, McQueen L, Demakis J, Mittman BS. An organizational framework and strategic implementation for system-level change to enhance research-based practice: QUERI Series. Implementation Science 2008, 3:30. 10.1186/1748-5908-3-30, 2430586, 18510750.
    • (2008) Implementation Science , vol.3 , pp. 30
    • Stetler, C.B.1    McQueen, L.2    Demakis, J.3    Mittman, B.S.4
  • 3
    • 3042664421 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice
    • 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x, 15189396
    • Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: Recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2004, 10(2):307-312. 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x, 15189396.
    • (2004) J Eval Clin Pract , vol.10 , Issue.2 , pp. 307-312
    • Lancaster, G.A.1    Dodd, S.2    Williamson, P.R.3
  • 4
    • 0032057031 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research
    • 10.1177/104973239800800305, 10558335
    • Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998, 8(3):341-351. 10.1177/104973239800800305, 10558335.
    • (1998) Qual Health Res , vol.8 , Issue.3 , pp. 341-351
    • Popay, J.1    Rogers, A.2    Williams, G.3
  • 5
    • 2942754018 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The problem of appraising qualitative research
    • 10.1136/qshc.2003.008714, 1743851, 15175495
    • Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2004, 13(3):223-225. 10.1136/qshc.2003.008714, 1743851, 15175495.
    • (2004) Quality and Safety in Health Care , vol.13 , Issue.3 , pp. 223-225
    • Dixon-Woods, M.1    Shaw, R.L.2    Agarwal, S.3    Smith, J.A.4
  • 6
    • 80052336545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices
    • Epub 2011, 3149080, 21829330
    • Bennett C, Khangura S, Brehaut JC, Graham ID, Moher D, Potter BK, Grimshaw JM. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Med 2010, 8:e1001069. Epub 2011, 3149080, 21829330.
    • (2010) PLoS Med , vol.8
    • Bennett, C.1    Khangura, S.2    Brehaut, J.C.3    Graham, I.D.4    Moher, D.5    Potter, B.K.6    Grimshaw, J.M.7

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.