4D blood flow visualization fusing 3D and 4D MRA image sequences

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 443-453

  Forkert, Nils Daniel ^a   Fiehler, Jens ^a   Illies, Till ^a   Möller, Dietmar P F ^b   Handels, Heinz ^c   Säring, Dennis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

Author keywords

computer simulation; computer assisted image interpretation; hemodynamics; magnetic resonance angiography

Indexed keywords

ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FOUR DIMENISONAL IMAGING; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84864190408     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23652     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ries T, Wegscheider K, Wulff A, et al. Quantification of recurrence volumes after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysm as surrogate endpoint for treatment stability. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 593-598.
2. Fiehler J, Illies T, Piening M, et al. Territorial and microvascular perfusion impairment in brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 356-361.
3. Choi JH, Mohr JP,. Brain arteriovenous malformations in adults. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 299-308. (Pubitemid 40545041)
4. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, Knopp MV, van Kaick G, Essig M,. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2957-2964. (Pubitemid 36940418)
5. Friedlander RM,. Clinical practice. Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 2704-2712. (Pubitemid 47001039)
6. Fasulakis S, Andronikou S,. Comparison of MR angiography and conventional angiography in the investigation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms in children. Pediatr Radiol 2003; 33: 378-384. (Pubitemid 36748390)
7. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, Requardt M, Kauczor HU, Bock M,. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 40-48. (Pubitemid 40029893)
8. Davis WL, Warnock SH, Harnsberger HR, Parker DL, Chen CX,. Intracranial MRA: single volume vs. multiple thin slab 3D time-of-flight acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 15-21. (Pubitemid 23029793)
9. Suri JS, Liu K, Reden L, Laxminarayan S,. A review on MR vascular image processing algorithms: acquisition and prefiltering. Part I. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2002; 6: 324-337.
10. Kholmovski EG, Alexander AL, Parker DL,. Correction of slab boundary artifact using histogram matching. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 610-617. (Pubitemid 34461558)
11. Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC,. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 87-97. (Pubitemid 128742012)
12. Forkert ND, Saring D, Fiehler J, Illies T, Moller D, Handels H,. Automatic brain segmentation in time-of-flight MRA images. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 399-407.
13. Handels H, Ehrhardt J,. Medical image computing for computer-supported diagnostics and therapy. Advances and perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48: 11-17.
14. Lesage D, Angelini ED, Bloch I, Funka-Lea G,. A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes. Med Image Anal 2009; 13: 819-845.
15. Suri JS, Liu K, Reden L, Laxminarayan S,. A review on MR vascular image processing: skeleton versus nonskeleton approaches. Part II. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2002; 6: 338-350.
16. Forkert ND, Schmidt-Richberg A, Fiehler J, et al. Fuzzy-based vascular structure enhancement in time-of-flight MRA images for improved segmentation. Methods Inf Med 2011; 50: 74-83.
17. Lorensen WE, Cline HE,. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. Comput Graph 1987; 21: 163-169.
18. Shpilfoygel SD, Close RA, Valentino DJ, Duckwiler GR,. X-ray videodensitometric methods for blood flow and velocity measurement: a critical review of literature. Med Phys 2000; 27: 2008-2023.
19. Forkert ND, Fiehler J, Ries T, et al. Reference-based linear curve fitting for bolus arrival time estimation in 4D MRA and MR perfusion-weighted image sequences. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 289-294.
20. Thompson HK Jr, Starmer CF, Whalen RE, McIntosh HD,. Indicator transit time considered as a gamma variate. Circ Res 1964; 14: 502-515.
21. Wells WM 3rd, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R,. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996; 1: 35-51. (Pubitemid 126421955)
22. Lee TC, Kashyap RL, Chu CN,. Building skeleton models via 3-D medial surface/axis thinning algorithms. CVGIP: Graph Models Image Process 1994; 56: 462-478.
23. Säring D, Forkert ND, Illies T, Fiehler J, Handels H,. Evaluation of methods for bolus arrival time determination using a four-dimensional MRA flow phantom. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010; 160 (Pt 2): 1263-1267.
24. Spetzler RF, Martin NA,. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986; 65: 476-483. (Pubitemid 16000693)
25. Warnock NG, Gandhi MR, Bergvall U, Powell T,. Complications of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. Br J Radiol 1993; 66: 855-858. (Pubitemid 23296837)
26. Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB,. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001; 57: 2012-2014. (Pubitemid 33126867)
27. Byrne JV, Colominas C, Hipwell J, et al. Assessment of a technique for 2D-3D registration of cerebral intra-arterial angiography. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 123-128. (Pubitemid 38313225)
28. Groher M, Zikic D, Navab N,. Deformable 2D-3D registration of vascular structures in a one view scenario. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009; 28: 847-860.
29. Schmitt H, Grass M, Rasche V, Schramm O, Haehnel S, Sartor K,. An X-ray-based method for the determination of the contrast agent propagation in 3-D vessel structures. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21: 251-262. (Pubitemid 34630842)
30. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Nakashima K, Hamatake S, Honda S, Takahashi M,. Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1545-1552. (Pubitemid 35154996)
31. Mitsos AP, Kakalis NM, Ventikos YP, Byrne JV,. Haemodynamic simulation of aneurysm coiling in an anatomically accurate computational fluid dynamics model: technical note. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 341-347.
32. Cebral JR, Mut F, Weir J, Putman CM,. Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 264-270.
33. Kakalis NM, Mitsos AP, Byrne JV, Ventikos Y,. The haemodynamics of endovascular aneurysm treatment: a computational modelling approach for estimating the influence of multiple coil deployment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008; 27: 814-824. (Pubitemid 351760853)
34. Orlowski P, Noble JA, Ventikos Y, Byrne JV, Summers P,. Image-based simulation of brain arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics. 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro 2008: 676-679.
35. Calamante F, Yim PJ, Cebral JR,. Estimation of bolus dispersion effects in perfusion MRI using image-based computational fluid dynamics. NeuroImage 2003; 19 (2 Pt 1): 341-353. (Pubitemid 39665685)
36. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008; 246: 205-213. (Pubitemid 350305045)
37. Kukuk GM, Hadizadeh DR, Bostrom A, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study of 4D-MRA in combination with selective arterial spin labeling and digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 2010; 45: 126-132.
38. Nishimura S, Hirai T, Sasao A, et al. Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 80-85.
39. Bi X, Weale P, Schmitt P, Zuehlsdorff S, Jerecic R,. Non-contrast- enhanced four-dimensional (4D) intracranial MR angiography: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 835-841.
40. Okell TW, Chappell MA, Woolrich MW, Gunther M, Feinberg DA, Jezzard P,. Vessel-encoded dynamic magnetic resonance angiography using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 698-706.