Unexploded ordnance discrimination using magnetic and electromagnetic sensors: Case study from a former military site

Geophysics

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Billings, Stephen D ^a   Pasion, Leonard R ^a   Beran, Laurens ^b   Lhomme, Nicolas ^a   Song, Lin Ping ^b   Oldenburg, Douglas W ^b   Kingdon, Kevin ^a   Sinex, David ^b   Jacobson, Jon ^a  

^a Sky Research Inc   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; MAGNETOMETERS; MORTAR; ORDNANCE; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

DISCRIMINATION ABILITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC SENSORS; MEASUREMENT BANDWIDTH; POLARIZATION TENSORS; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION; TIME DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETICS; UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE DISCRIMINATIONS;

TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS;

MAGNETOMETER; MORTAR; POLARIZATION; REMANENT MAGNETIZATION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; MAGNETIC ANOMALY; MILITARY APPLICATION; SENSOR;

EID: 84864155131     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3377009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bell, T.H. Barrow, B.J. Miller, J.T., 2001, Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensor: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 1286-1293.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/36.927451
2. Beran, L. Oldenburg, D.W., 2008, Selecting a discrimination algorithm for unexploded ordnance remediation: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46, 2547-2557.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/TGRS.2008.921394
3. Billings, S.D., 2004, Discrimination and classification of buried unexploded ordnance using magnetometry: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 1241-1251.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/TGRS.2004.826803
4. Billings, S.D. Pasion, L.R. Oldenburg, D.W., 2002, Discrimination and identification of UXO by geophysical inversion of total-field magnetic data: U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Report ERDC/GSL TR-02-16, http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/uxo/pdfs/trg02-17.pdf, accessed 14 February 2010.
5. Bosnar, M., 2001, Geonics Ltd. Techical Note TN-33, http://geonics.com/pdfs/technicalnotes/tn33.pdf, accessed 14 February 2010.
6. Branch, M.A. Coleman, T.F. Li, Y., 1999, A subspace, interior, and conjugate gradient method for large-scale bound-constrained minimization problems: SIAM Journal of Scientific Computation, 21, no. 1, 1-23., 10.1137/S1064827595289108
7. Collins, L. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Wang, H. Carin, L. Hart, S. Rose-Pehrsson, S. Nelson, H. McDonald, J.R., 2001, A comparison of the performance of statistical and fuzzy algorithms for unexploded ordnance detection: IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 9, 17-30.9c6, IEFSEV, 1063-6706, 10.1109/91.917111
8. Das, Y. McFee, J.E. Toews, J. Stuart, G.C., 1990, Analysis of an electromagnetic induction detector for real-time location of buried objects: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28, 278-287.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/36.54354
9. Gasperikova, E. Smith, T.J. Morrison, H.F. Becker, A. Kappler, K., 2009, UXO detection and identification based on intrinsic target polarizabilities - A case history: Geophysics, 74, no. 1, B1-B8.gpy, GPYSA7, 0016-8033, 10.1190/1.2997419
10. Hart, S.J. Shaffer, R.E. Rose-Pehrsson, S.L. McDonald, J.R., 2001, Using physics based modeler outputs to train probabilistic neural networks for unexploded ordnance classification in magnetometry surveys: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 797-804.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/36.917899
11. Lhomme, N. Oldenburg, D.W. Pasion, L.R. Sinex, D.B. Billings, S.D., 2008, Assessing the quality of electromagnetic data for the discrimination of UXO using figures of merit: Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics, 13, 165-176., 10.2113/JEEG13.3.165
12. McNeil, J.D. Bosnar, M., 2000, Geonics Ltd. Technical Note TN-32, http://geonics.com/pdfs/technicalnotes/tn32.pdf, accessed 14 February 2010.
13. Nelson, H.H. Bell, T.H. McDonald, J.R. Barrows, B., 2003, Advanced MTADS classification for detection and discrimination of UXO: Environmental Security Technology Certification Program Final Report, http://www.estcp.org/viewfile.cfm?Doc-UX%2D4003%2DFR@sD01%2Epdf, accessed 14 February 2010.
14. Pasion, L.R. Billings, S.D. Kingdon, K.A. Oldenburg, D.W. Lhomme, N. Jacobson, J., 2008, Cooperative inversion of time domain electromagnetic and magnetometer data for the discrimination of unexploded ordnance: Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics, 13, 193-210., 10.2113/JEEG13.3.193
15. Pasion, L.R. Oldenburg, D.W., 2001, A discrimination algorithm for UXO using time domain electromagnetics: Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics, 6, 91-102., 10.4133/JEEG6.2.91
16. Smith, J.T. Morrison, H.F. Becker, A., 2004, Parametric forms and the inductive response of a permeable conducting sphere: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 9, 213-216.c8e 1083-1363, 10.4133/JEEG9.4.213
17. Zhang, Y. Collins, L.M. Carin, L., 2003a, Model-based statistical signal processing for UXO discrimination: Performance results from the JPG-V demonstration: 8th Conference on Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets, SPIE, 5089, 1116-1126.
18. Zhang, Y. Collins, L. Yu, H. Baum, C.E. Carin, L., 2003b, Sensing of unexploded ordnance with magnetometer and induction data: Theory and signal processing: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 1005-1015.igr, IGRSD2, 0196-2892, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.810922