UXO detection and identification based on intrinsic target polarizabilities - A case history

GEOPHYSICS

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Gasperikova, Erika ^a   Smith, J Torquil ^a   Morrison, H Frank ^a   Becker, Alex ^a   Kappler, Karl ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION; METALS; MORTAR; ORDNANCE; POLARIZATION; SURVEYS;

CURRENT PRACTICES; DIPOLE POLARIZABILITIES; MODE OF OPERATIONS; POLARIZABILITIES; SYMMETRIC BODY; TIME DEPENDENT; TRAINING DATA SETS; UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE;

SCRAP METAL;

DATA PROCESSING; DATA SET; DETECTION METHOD; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY;

EID: 58149465596     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2997419     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baum, C. E., 1999, Low frequency near-field magnetic scattering from highly conducting, but not perfectly conducting bodies, in C. E. Baum, ed., Detection and identification of visually obscured targets: Taylor & Francis, 163-217.
2. Bell, T. H., B. J. Barrow, and J. T. Miller, 2001, Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 1286-1293. igr IGRSD2 0196-2892 10.1109/36.927451
3. Cazares, S., M. Tuley, and M. May, 2008, The UXO discrimination study at the former Camp Sibert: Institute for Defense Analyses document D-3572.
4. Gasperikova, E., J. T. Smith, H. F. Morrison, and A. Becker, 2006, UXO detection and characterization using new Berkeley UXO discriminator (BUD): EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union Joint Assembly, 87, no., 36 abstract NS31A-02.
5. Gasperikova, E., J. T. Smith, H. F. Morrison, and A. Becker, 2007, Berkeley UXO discriminator (BUD): SAGEEP Proceedings, 20, 1049-1055.
6. Hoel, P. G., S. C. Port, and C. J. Stone, 1971, Introduction to probability theory: Houghton Mifflin Co.
7. Huang, H., B. SanFilipo, A. Oren, and I. J. Won, 2007, Coaxial-coil towed EMI sensor array for UXO detection and characterization: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 61, 217-226. c4u JAGPEA 0926-9851
8. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, 2004, Geophysical prove-outs for munitions response projects, technical and regulatory guideline, http://www.itrcweb.org/guidancedocument.asp?TID=19, accessed 29 July 2008.
9. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, 2006, Survey of munitions response technologies, http://www.itrcweb.org/guidancedocument.asp?TID= 19, accessed 29 July 2008.
10. Khadr, N., B. J. Barrow, T. H. Bell, and H. H. Nelson, 1998, Target shape classification using electromagnetic induction sensor data: Proceedings of the UXO Forum.
11. McNeill, J. D., and M. Bosnar, 1996, Application of time domain electromagnetic techniques to UXO detection: Proceedings of the UXO Forum, 34-42.
12. Pasion, L. R., S. D. Billings, D. W. Oldenburg, and S. E. Walker, 2007, Application of a library based method to time domain electromagnetic data for the identification of unexploded ordnance: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 61, 279-291. c4u JAGPEA 0926-9851
13. Pasion, L. R., and D. W. Oldenburg, 2001, Locating and determining dimensionality of UXO's using time domain electromagnetic fields: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 6, 91-102. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
14. Smith, J. T., and H. F. Morrison, 2004, Estimating equivalent dipole polarizabilities for the inductive response of isolated conductive bodies: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 1208-1214. igr IGRSD2 0196-2892 10.1109/TGRS.2004.826789
15. Smith, J. T., and H. F. Morrison, 2005, Optimizing receiver configurations for resolution of equivalent dipole polarizabilities in situ: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 1490-1498. igr IGRSD2 0196-2892 10.1109/TGRS.2005.846869
16. Smith, J. T., H. F. Morrison, L. R. Doolittle, and H.-W. Tseng, 2007, Multi-transmitter null coupled systems for inductive detection and characterization of metallic objects: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 61, 227-234. c4u JAGPEA 0926-9851 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.05.011
17. Snyder, D. D., and D. George, 2005, A dual-mode TEM and magnetics system for detection and classification of UXO: SAGEEP Proceedings, 18, 1244-1253.
18. U. S. Department of Defense, 2003, Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on unexploded ordnance, http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ uxo.pdf, accessed 29 July 2008.
19. Won, I. J., D. A. Keiswetter, D. R. Hanson, E. Novikova, and T. M. Hall, 1997, GEM-3: A monostatic broadband electromagnetic induction sensor: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2, 53-64. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033
20. Wright, D., C. Moulton, T. Asch, P. Brown, M. Nabighian, Y. Li, and C. Oden, 2007, ALLTEM UXO detection sensitivity and inversions for target parameters from Yuma proving ground test data: SAGEEP Proceedings, 20, 1422-1435.