Open innovation in urban energy systems

Energy Efficiency

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 351-364

  Arnold, Marlen ^a   Barth, Volker ^b  

^a TUM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bottom up urban transformation; Energy efficiency; Open innovation; Service innovation; Urban planning processes; User integration

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP URBAN TRANSFORMATION; OPEN INNOVATION; PLANNING PROCESS; SERVICE INNOVATION; USER INTEGRATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; GREENHOUSE GASES; INDUSTRY; URBAN PLANNING;

INNOVATION;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY USE; GREENHOUSE GAS; INNOVATION; PLANNING PROCESS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 84864152042     PISSN: 1570646X     EISSN: 15706478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-011-9142-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14, 3-22.
2. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40-47.
3. Agger, A., & Löfgren, K. (2008). Democratic assessment of collaborative planning. Planning Theory, 7(2), 145-164.
4. Agusdinata, D. B., & DeLaurentis, D. (2008). Specification of system-of-systems for policymaking in the energy sector. The Integrated Assessment Journal, 8(2), 1-24.
5. Amin, M. (2002). Toward secure and resilient interdependent infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8(3), 67-75.
6. Arnold, M. (2010). Stakeholder dialogues for sustaining cultural change. International Studies of Management and Organisation. Social Sustainability, 40(3), 61-77.
7. Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37 (2), 47-65.
8. Barth, V., Krefeldt, J., & Marinesse, J.-C. (2007). EcoClass-An easy-to-access GUI for LCA data to assess product utilization schemes. In J. Marx Gómez et al. (Eds.), Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering (pp. 377-386). Berlin: Springer.
9. Biggart, N. W., & Lutzenhiser, L. (2007). Economic sociology and the social problem of energy inefficiency. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1070-1087.
10. Bin, S., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2005). Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 33(2), 197-208.
11. Caird, S., Roy, R., & Herring, H. (2008). Improving the energy performance of UK households: Results from surveys of consumer adoption and use of low-and zero-carbon technologies. Energy Efficiency, 1(2), 149-166.
12. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics. A european perspective. Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Franke, N., & Piller, F. T. (2004). Value creation by toolkits for user innovation and design: The case of the watch market. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 401-415.
15. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32, 157-178.
16. Freeman, E., et al. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jonsson, D. K. (2011). Energy at your service: highlighting energy usage systems in the context of energy efficiency analysis. Energy Effciency. doi:10.1007/s12053-010-9103-5.
18. Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36, 4093-4103.
19. Kuronen, M., et al. (2010). Public-private-people partnership as a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from residential development. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 14, 200-216.
20. Lahti, P., et al. (2006). Towards sustainable urban infrastructure: assessment, tools and practice. Helsinki: European Science Foundation.
21. Lenzen, M. (1998). Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: An input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 26(6), 495-506.
22. Lüthje, C., & Herstatt, C. (2004). The lead-user method: An outline of empirical findings and issues for future research. R&D Management, 34(5), 553-568.
23. Majamaa, W. (2008). The 4th P-people-in urban development based on public-private-people partnership. TKK Structural Engineering and Building Technology Dissertations, 2 TKK-RVK2. Helsinki University of Technology.
24. Mäntysalo, R. (2002). Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Planning Review, 73(4), 417-436.
25. Munksgaard, J., Pedersen, K. A., & Wien, M. (2000). Impact of household consumption on CO2 emissions. Energy Economics, 22(4), 423-440.
26. Norman, J., MacLean, H. L., & Kennedy, C. A. (2006). Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Urban Planning and Development (ASCE), 132 (1), 10-21.
27. OECD (2009) Promoting consumer education, trends, policies and good practices. http://www.oecd.org. Accessed 28 July 2010.
28. Ogawa, S., & Piller, F. T. (2006). Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47 (2), 65-71.
29. Oikonomou, V. (2009). Energy saving and energy efficiency concepts for policy making. Energy Policy, 37, 4787-4796.
30. Perrels, A. (2010). User response and equity considerations regarding emission cap-and-trade schemes for travel. Energy Efficiency, 3(2), 149-165.
31. Phdungsilp, A. (2010). Integrated energy and carbon modelling with a decision support system: Policy scenarios for lowcarbon city development in Bangkok. Energy Policy, 38, 4808-4817.
32. Piller, F. T., & Walcher, D. (2006). Toolkits for idea competitions. A novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Management, 36, 307-318.
33. Piller, F. T., et al. (2004). Customers as co-designers: A framework for open innovation. Paper 116. Congress of the International Federation of Scholarly Associations of Management (IFSAM), 5-7 July 2004, Göteborg, Schweden.
34. Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
35. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
36. Reinders, A. H. M. E., Vringer, K., & Blok, K. (2003). The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the European Union. Energy Policy, 31(2), 139-153.
37. Staley, S. (2009). Mobility first: A new vision for transportation in a globally competitive twenty-first century. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
38. Stephenson, J., et al. (2010). Energy cultures: A framework for understanding energy behaviours. Energy Policy, 38, 6120-6129.
39. Tanatvanit, S., Limmeechokchai, B., & Chungpaibulpatana, S. (2003). Sustainable energy development strategies: implications of energy demand management and renewable energy in Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 7, 367-395.
40. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuties and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439-465.
41. UBA [Umweltbundesamt] (2008). Nationale Trendtabellen für die deutsche Berichterstattung atmosphärischer Emissionen 1990-2007 (Endstand 12.11.2008), Dessau.
42. Ürge-Vorsatz, D., et al. (2009). Bottom-up assessment of potentials and costs of CO2 emission mitigation in the buildings sector: insights into the missing elements. Energy Efficiency, 2(4), 293-316.
43. Väyrynen, E. (2007). Planning and implementation-from separation to joint processes. Nordic Planning Research Symposium on Local Authority Planning in Change: Beyond Dichotomies, August 16-18, 2007. Oulu: University of Oulu, Department of Architecture.
44. Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users. A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
45. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
46. Wilk, R. (2002). Consumption, human needs, and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 12, 5-13.