Medical decision support system for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders using DWT and fuzzy support vector machines

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 806-815

  Subasi, Abdulhamit ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL BURCH UNIVERSITY   (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network (ANN); C4.5 decision tree; Discrete wavelet transform (DWT); Electromyography (EMG); Fuzzy SVM; Linear discriminant analysis (LDA); Motor unit action potentials (MUAPs); Radial basis function networks (RBFN); Support vector machine (SVM)

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION MODELS; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; COMBINED MODEL; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CROSS VALIDATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC SIGNAL; EMG SIGNAL; FUZZY SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; FUZZY SVM; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MACHINE LEARNING METHODS; MEDICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MOTOR UNIT ACTION POTENTIALS; NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS; RECIEVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES; RECOGNITION RATES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION TREES; DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORMS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; NEURAL NETWORKS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORM; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUZZY SYSTEM; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MYOPATHY; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864128286     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Merletti R., Parker P. Electromyography: Physiology Engineering, and Noninvasive Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.
2. DeLuca C.J. Towards Understanding the EMG Signal 1978, Williams & Wilkinson, Baltimore.
3. Krarup C. Pitfalls in electrodiagnosis. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 81:1115-1126.
4. McGill K.C. Optimal resolution of superimposed action potentials. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 49:640-650.
5. Richfield E.K., Cohen B.A., Albers J.W. Review of quantitative and automated needle electromyographic analyses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1981, 28(7):506-514.
6. Pattichis C.S., Pattichis M.S. Time-scale analysis of motor unit action potentials. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 46(11):1320-1329.
7. Pattichis C.S., Elia A.G. Autoregressive and cepstral analyses of motor unit action potentials. Med. Eng. Phys. 1999, 21:405-419.
8. Pattichis C.S., Schizas C.N., Mittleton L.T. Neural network models in EMG diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1995, 42:486-496.
9. Subasi A., Yilmaz M., Ozcalik H.R. Classification of EMG signals using wavelet neural network. J. Neurosci. Methods 2006, 156:360-367.
10. Katsis C.D., Goletsis Y., Likas A., Fotiadis D.I., Sarmas I. A novel method for automated EMG decomposition and MUAP classification. Artif. Intell. Med. 2006, 37:55-64.
11. Katsis C.D., Exarchos T.P., Papaloukas C., Goletsis Y., Fotiadis D.I., Sarmas I. A two-stage method for MUAP classification based on EMG decomposition. Comput. Biol. Med. 2007, 37:1232-1240.
12. Pino L.J., Stashuk D.W., Boe S.G., Doherty T.J. Motor unit potential characterization using pattern discovery. Med. Eng. Phys. 2008, 30:563-573.
13. Yan Z., Wang Z., Xie H. The application of mutual information-based feature selection and fuzzy LS-SVM-based classifier in motion classification. Comput. Meth. Program. Biomed. 2008, 90:275-284.
14. Kamavuako E.N., Farina D., Yoshida K., Jensen W. Relationship between grasping force and features of single-channel intramuscular EMG signals. J. Neurosci. Methods 2009, 185:143-150.
15. Dobrowolski A.P., Wierzbowski M., Tomczykiewicz K., Multiresolution M.U.A. s decomposition and SVM-based analysis in the classification of neuromuscular disorders. Comput. Meth. Program. Biomed. 2010, 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.12.006.
16. Subasi A. Classification of EMG signals using combined features and soft computing techniques. Appl. Soft Comput. 2012, 12:2188-2198.
17. Daubechies I. The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1990, 36(5):961-1005.
18. Daubechies I., Mallat S., Willsky A.S. Introduction to the special issue on wavelet transforms and multiresolution signal analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1992, 38:529-532.
19. Vetterli M., Herley C. Wavelets and filter banks: theory and design. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 1992, 40:2207-2232.
20. Mallat S. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing 1999, Academic Press, Wavelet Analysis & Its Applications. second ed.,.
21. Marchant B.P. Time-frequency analysis for biosystem engineering. Biosystems Eng. 2003, 85(3):261-281.
22. Semmlow J.L. Biosignal and Biomedical Image Processing, MATLAB-Based Applications 2004, 270. Marcel Dekker Inc, Madison Avenue, New York.
23. Sornmo L., Laguna P. Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications 2006, Elsevier Academic Press.
24. Adeli H., Zhou Z., Dadmehr N. Analysis of EEG records in an epileptic patient using wavelet transform. J. Neurosci. Methods 2003, 123:69-87.
25. Akay M. Wavelet applications in medicine. IEEE Spectr. 1997, 34(5):50-56.
26. Subasi A. Automatic recognition of alertness level from EEG by using neural network and wavelet coefficients. Expert Syst. Appl. 2005, 28:701-711.
27. Subasi A. EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 32:1084-1093.
28. Kandaswamy A., Kumar C.S., Ramanathan R.P., Jayaraman S., Malmurugan N. Neural classification of lung sounds using wavelet coefficients. Comput. Biol. Med. 2004, 34(6):523-537.
29. Webb A.R. Statistical Pattern Recognition 2002, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex.
30. Rapid Miner machine learning tool, . http://www.rapidminer.com/.
31. Micheli-Tzanakou E. Neural networks in biomedical signal processing. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook 2000, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton. J.D. Bronzino (Ed.).
32. Fausett L. Fundamentals of Neural Networks Architectures, Algorithms, and Applications 1994, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
33. Haykin S. Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation 1994, Macmillan, New York.
34. Poggio T., Girosi F. Networks for approximation and learning. Proc. IEEE 1990, 78(9):1481-1497.
35. Du K.L., Swamy M.N.S. Neural Networks in a Softcomputing Framework 2006, Springer-Verlag, London Limited.
36. Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Stork D. Pattern Lassification 2002, John Wiley & Sons. second ed.
37. Quinlan J. Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 1996, 4:77-90.
38. Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory 1998, Wiley, New York.
39. Burges C.J.C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowledge Discovery 1998, 2(2):121-167.
40. Suykens J.A.K., De Brabanter J., Lukas L., Vandewalle J. Weighted least squares support vector machines: robustness and sparse approximation. Neurocomputing 2002, 48:85-105.
41. Abe S. Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification 2005, Springer, London.
42. Fielding A.H. Cluster and Classification Techniques for the Biosciences 2007, Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, UK.
43. Lin C.F., Wang S.D. Fuzzy support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2002, 13(2):464-471.
44. Lin C.F., Wang S.D. Fuzzy support vector machines with automatic membership setting, (2005). Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications 2005, 233-254. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. L. Wang (Ed.).
45. Wang T.-Y., Chiang H.-M. Fuzzy support vector machine for multi-class text categorization. Inf. Process. Manage. 2007, 43:914-929.
46. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data Mining, Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2005, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Elsevier, San Francisco, CA. second ed.
47. Zhang R., McAllister G., Scotney B., McClean S., Houston G. Combining wavelet analysis and bayesian networks for the classification of auditory brainstem response. IEEE Trans Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2006, 10(3):458-467.
48. Ambroise C., McLachlan G.J. Selection bias in gene extraction on the basis of microarray gene-expression data. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99(10):6562-6566.
49. Karageorgiou E. The logic of exploratory and confirmatory data analysis. Cognitive Critique 2011, 35-48.
50. Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982, 143:29-36.
51. Obuchowski N.A. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003, 229:3-8.
52. Swets J.A. ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest. Radiol. 1979, 14(2):109-121.
53. Devos A., Lukas L., Suykens J.A.K., Vanhamme L., Tate A.R., Howe F.A., Majos C., Moreno-Torres A., van der Graaf M., Arus S., Van Huffel S. Classification of brain tumours using short echo time H MR spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 2004, 170:164-175.
54. J.M. Deleo, Receiver operating characteristic laboratory (ROCLAB): software for developing decision strategies that account for uncertainty, in: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Uncertainty Modelling and Analysis, College Park, MD: IEEE, Computer Society Press, 1993, pp. 318-325.
55. Zweig M.H., Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin. Chem. 1993, 39:561-577.
56. Christiani N., Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines 2000, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
57. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Buydens L.M.C., De Jong S., Lewi P.J., Smeyers-Verbeke J. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics, Part A 1997, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
58. Belousov A.I., Verzakov S.A., von Frese J. A flexible classification approach with optimal generalisation performance: support vector machines. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 64:15-25.