Personal genomics: Are we debating the right issues?;Personalisierte genomik: Führen wir die richtige debatte?

Praxis

Volumn 101, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 961-964

  Vayena, Effy ^a   Mauch, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Direct to consumer genomics; Genomic research; P4 medicine; Personalized medicine

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERSONAL GENOMICS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SHORT SURVEY;

FORECASTING; GENETIC DETERMINISM; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC TESTING; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; REAGENT KITS, DIAGNOSTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84864123285     PISSN: 16618157     EISSN: 16618165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001008     Document Type: Short Survey

References (26)

1. Rothstein MA: Genetic exceptionalismand legislative pragmatism. J Law Med Ethics 2007; 35 (2 Suppl): 59-65.
2. Evans JP, Berg JS: Next-Generation DNA Sequencing, Regulation, and the Limits of Paternalism. The Next Challenge. JAMA 2011; 21: 2376-2377.
3. Evans JP, Green RC: Direct to consumer genetic testing: Avoiding a culture war. Genet Med 2009; 8: 568-569.
4. Bunnik EM, Schermer MH, Janssens AC: Personal genome testing: test characteristics to clarify the discourse on ethical, legal and societal issues. BMCMed Ethics 2011; 12: 11.
5. Evans JP, Dale DC, Fomous C: Preparing for a consumer-driven genomic age. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1099-1103.
6. Kuehn BM: Risks and benefits of direct-to-consumer genetic testing remain unclear. JAMA 2008, 300: 1503-1505.
7. Patch C, Sequeiros J, Cornel MC: Genetic horoscopes: is it all in the genes? Points for regulatory control of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 17: 857-859.
8. Caulfield T: Direct-to-consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario? Am J Bioeth 2009; 9: 48-50.
9. Gurwitz D, Bregman-Eschet Y: Personal genomics services: whose genomes? Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17: 883-889.
10. European Society of Human Genetics. Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 12: 1271-1273.
11. Expertenkommission für genetische Untersuchungen beim Menschen (GUMEK). Informationskampagne: Gentests aus dem Internet, 2009.
12. Skirton H, Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O'Connor A: Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations. Clin Genet 2012 Feb 28, Epub ahead of print.
13. Mykitiuk R: Caveat emptor: direct-to-consumer supply and advertising of genetic testing. Clin Invest Med 2004; 27: 23-32.
14. 23andwe.com
15. Goldsmith L, Jackson L, O'Connor A, Skirton H: Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 2012 Feb 15, Epub ahead of print.
16. Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ: Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genome-wide Profiling to Assess Disease Risk. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 524-534.
17. Nuffield Council of Bioethics. Medical Profiling and Online Medicine: the Ethics of «Personalised Healthcare» in a consumer age. Nuffield, 2010.
18. Kohane IS, Altman RB: Health-information altruists - a potentially critical resource. N Engl JMed 2005; 19: 2074-2077. (Pubitemid 41609103)
19. Swan M: Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. JMed Internet Res 2012; 14: e46.
20. Swan M: Emerging patient-driven health caremodels: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalizedmedicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6: 492-525.
21. Editorial. Genomicmedicine and the NHS: it is possible. Lancet 2012; 379: 386.
22. Hood L, Friend SH: Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancermedicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011; 8: 184-187.
23. Terry SF, Terry PF: Power to the people: participant ownership of clinical trial data. Sci Transl Med 2011; 69: 69cm3.
24. Bundesgesetz über genetische Untersuchungen beim Menschen (GUMG). Abschnitt 5.
25. Association of British Insurers. http://www.abi.org.uk/Media/Releases/ 2011/04/Insurance-Genetics-Moratorium-extended-to-2017.aspx
26. Chadwick R: Personal Genomes: No bad news? Bioethics 2011; 25: 62-65.