Conservation partnerships and biodiversity governance: Fulfilling governance functions through interaction

Sustainable Development

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 264-275

  Visseren Hamakers, Ingrid Jacoba ^a   Leroy, Pieter ^b   Glasbergen, Pieter ^c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environmental policy; Global environmental governance; Non government organizations; Regime; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

HOMINIDAE;

EID: 84864118819     PISSN: 09680802     EISSN: 10991719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sd.482     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Andresen S, Hey E. 2005. The effectiveness and legitimacy of international environmental institutions. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 5(3): 211-226.
2. Bezençon V. 2009. Producers and the fair trade distribution systems: what are the benefits and problems Sustainable Development. Published online. DOI: 10.1002/sd.420.
3. Bitzer V, Francken M, Glasbergen P. 2008. Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Global Environmental Change Part A 18: 271-284.
4. Caldecott J, Miles L (eds). 2005. World Atlas of Great Apes and Their Conservation. Prepared at the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.
5. Cashore B, Auld G et al. 2004. Governing Through Markets. Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
6. CEPF. 2006-2007. Hotspot Assessment Reports. .
7. CEPF. 2007a. Setting Priorities for Future Investment. CEPF/DC11/10. CEPF: Arlington VA.
8. CEPF. 2007b. Strategic Framework. FY 2008-2012. CEPF: Arlington VA.
9. CEPF. 2007c. Global Overview. August 2007. CEPF: Arlington VA.
10. CITES. 2004. Conservation of and Trade in Great Apes. Resolution Conf. 13.4. CEPF: Arlington VA.
11. Giddens A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press: Cambridge.
12. Glasbergen P. 2007. Setting the Scene: The Partnership Paradigm in the Making. In Partnerships, Governance, and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice, Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol A (eds). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA; 16-17.
13. Goodin R. 1996. Institutions and their design. In The Theory of Institutional Design Goodin R (ed). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
14. GRASP. 2005. Rules for the Organization and Management of the GRASP Partnership. UNEP: Nairobi.
15. GRASP. 2006. GRASP Programme of Action (2006-2007). UNEP: Nairobi.
16. Gulbrandsen L. 2004. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environmental Politics 4(2): 75-99.
17. Hajer M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
18. Hopkin M. 2007. Gorillas on the List. Nature 449: 127.
19. Huijstee M van, Francken M, Leroy P. 2007. Partnerships for sustainable development: a review of current literature. Environmental Sciences 4(2): 75-89.
20. Ite UE. 2007. Partnering with the state for sustainable development: Shell's experience in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Sustainable Development 15(4): 216-228.
21. Jolly A. 2005. The Last Great Apes? Science 309(5740): 1457.
22. Keohane R, Haas P et al. 1995. The effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection Haas P, Keohane R, Levy M (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
23. Leebron D. 2002. Linkages. The American Journal of International Law 96(1): 5-27.
24. Levy M, Keohane R et al. 1995. Improving the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. In Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection Haas P, Keohane R, Levy M (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
25. Miles E, Underdal A et al. (eds). 2001. Environmental Regime Effectiveness: Confronting Theory with Evidence. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
26. Mittermeier R, Gil P, Hoffman M et al. 2005. Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
27. Morse S, McNamara N. 2009. The universal common good: faith-based partnerships and sustainable development. Sustainable Development 17(1): 30-48.
28. Myers N. 1988. Threatened biotas: 'hot spots' in tropical forests. The Environmentalist 8(3): 187-208.
29. Myers N, Mittermeier R, Mittermeier C et al. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853-858.
30. Oberthür S. 2002. Clustering of multilateral environmental agreements: potentials and limitations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2: 317-340.
31. Oberthür S, Gehring T (eds). 2006. Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
32. Pattberg P. 2007. Private Institutions and Global Governance: The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability. Edward Elgar: Northanpton, MA.
33. Quental N, Lourenço J, Numes Da Silva F. 2009. Sustainable development policy: goals, targets and political cycles. Sustainable Development. Published online. DOI: 10.1002/sd.416.
34. Reinicke W. 1999. The other world wide web: global public policy networks. Foreign Policy 117: 44-58.
35. Rittberger V (ed). 1993. Regime Theory and International Relations. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
36. Rosenau J, Czempiel E et al. (eds). 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
37. Shaw D, Black I. 2009. Market based political action: a path to sustainable development Sustainable Development. Published online. DOI: 10.1002/sd.415.
38. Underdal A. 2002. One question, two answers. In Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Confronting Theory with Evidence, Miles E et al. (eds). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
39. Vermeulen W, Seuring S. 2009. Sustainability through the market - the impacts of sustainable supply chain management: introduction. Sustainable Development 17(5): 269-273.
40. Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Arts B, Glasbergen P. 2007. Partnership as governance mechanism in development cooperation: intersectoral north-south partnerships for marine biodiversity. In Partnerships, Governance and Sustainable Development: Reflections on Theory and Practice, Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol A (eds). Edward Elgar: Northampton, MA; 138-170.
41. Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Glasbergen P. 2007. Partnerships in forest governance. Global Environmental Change 17: 408-419.
42. WB. 2007. Implementation Completion and Results Report (WBTF-24879) on a Credit in the Amount of US $ 25.0 Million Equivalent to the Conservation International for a Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund ICR0000438. World Bank: Washington, DC.
43. Wells M, Curran L, Qayum S. 2006. Report of the Independent Evaluation of the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. CEPF: Arlington, VA.
44. Young O. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
45. Zeijl-Rosema A van, Cörvers R, Kemp R, Martens P. 2008. Governance for sustainable development: a framework. Sustainable Development 16: 410-421.