The factorial structure of the "Partnership Quiestionnaire";Die faktorielle Struktur des Partnerschaftsfragebogens

Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-113

  Kliem, Sören ^a   Kröger, Christoph ^a   Stöbel Richter, Yve ^b   Hahlweg, Kurt ^a   Brähler, Elmar ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Factorial structure; Marital satisfaction; Partnership Questionnaire; Relationship satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864088658     PISSN: 16163443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/1616-3443/a000138     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
2. Bodenmann, G., Plancherel, B., Beach, S. R. H., Widmer, K., Gabriel, B., Meuwly, N., Charvoz, L., Hautzinger, M. & Schramm, E. (2008). Effects of coping-oriented couples therapy on depression: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 944-954.
3. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
4. Browne, M. (1982). Covariance Structures. In D. M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis(pp.72-141). Cambridge: University Press.
5. Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long. (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models(pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Dinkel, A. & Balck, F. (2006). Psychometrische Analyse der deutschen Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 214, 1-9.
7. Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. H. (2010). Marriage in the New Millennium: A Decade in Review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 630-649.
8. Fincham, F. D. & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489-502.
9. Hahlweg, K. (1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik (FPD). HandanweisungGöttingen: Hogrefe.
10. Hahlweg, K. & Richter, D. (2010). Prevention of marital instability and couple distress: Results of an 11-year longitudinal follow-up study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 48, 377-383.
11. Hinz, A., Brähler, E., Geyer, M. & Körner, A. (2003). Urteilseffekte beim NEO-FFI. Diagnostica, 49, 157-163.
12. Hinz, A., Stöbel-Richter, Y. & Brähler, E. (2001). Der Partnerschaftsfragebogen (PFB): Normierung und soziodemographische Einflussgrößen auf die Partnerschaftsqualität. Diagnostica, 47, 132-141.
13. Homburg, C. & Baumgartner, H. (1995). Beurteilung von Kausalmodellen. Marketing, 17, 162-176.
14. Homburg, C., Pflesser, C. & Klarmann, M. (2008). Strukturgleichungsmodelle mit latenten Variablen: Kausalanalyse. In A. Herrmann, C. Homburg & M. Klarmann (Hrsg.), Handbuch Marktforschung(S. 547-578). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
15. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analyses: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 61-55.
16. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472-503.
17. Klann, N., Hahlweg, K. & Hank, G. (1992). Deutsche Validierung des "Marital Satisfaction Inventory" (MSI) von Snyder (1981). System Familie, 5, 10-21.
18. Klann, N., Hahlweg, K., Limbird, C. & Snyder, O. (2006). Einschätzung von Partnerschaft und Familie EPF. Manual für die deutsche Form des Marital Satisfaction Inventory-Revised (MSI-R) von D. Snyder. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
19. Mattson, R. E., Paldino, D. & Johnson, M. D. (2007). The increased construct validity and clinical utility of assessing relationship quality using separate positive and negative dimensions. Psychological Assessment, 19, 146-151.
20. Raykov, T. & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Reinecke, J. (2005). Strukturgleichungsmodelle in den Sozialwissenschaften. Oldenbourg: Wissenschaftsverlag.
22. Rossel, Y. (2011). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.4-9. Zugriff am 13.09.2011. www.unt.edu/rss/class/Jon/MiscDocs/lavaan1.pdf.
23. Rossier, J., Rigozzi, C., Charvoz, L. & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Marital Satisfaction: Psychometric Properties of the PFB and Comparison with the DAS. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 6555-63.
24. Sabourin, S., Lussier, J., Laplante, B. & Wright, J. (1990). Unidemensional and multidemsional models of dyadic adjustment. Psychological Assessment, 2, 333-337.
25. Sabourin, S., Valois, P. & Lussier, Y. (2005). Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model. Psychological Assessment, 17, 15-27.
26. Snyder, D. K. (1981). Marital Satisfaction Inventory (MSI). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
27. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
28. Terman, L. M., Butterwieser, P., Ferguson, L. W., Johnson, W. B. & Wilson, D. P. (1938). Psychological factors in marital happiness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Weiber, R. & Mühlhaus, D. (2009). Strukturgleichungsmodellierung: Eine Anwendungsorientierte Einführung in die Kausalanalyse mit Hilfe von AMOS, SmartPLS und SPSS. Heidelberg: Springer.
30. Whisman, M. A. (2007). Marital distress and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in a population-based national survey. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 638-643.
31. Whisman, M. A., Sheldon, C. T. & Goering, P. (2000). Psychiatric disorders and dissatisfaction with social relationships: Does type of relationship matter? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 803-808.