Development a case-based classifier for predicting highly cited papers

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 586-599

  Wang, Mingyang ^a,b   Yu, Guang ^b   Xu, Jianzhong ^c   He, Huixin ^b   Yu, Daren ^b   An, Shuang ^d  

^a NORTHEAST FORESTRY UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c HARBIN ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY AT QINHUANGDAO   (China)

Author keywords

Case based classifier; Highly cited papers; Prediction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864060165     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aksnes D.W. Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 2003, 12(3):159-170.
2. Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(1):45-80.
3. Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L. Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches. Journal of Informetrics 2012, 6(2):336-345.
4. Burrell Q.L. Stochastic modelling of the first-citation distribution. Scientometrics 2001, 52:3-12.
5. Burrell Q.L. On the nth-citation distribution and obsolescence. Scientometrics 2002, 53:309-323.
6. Burrell Q.L. Will this paper ever be cited?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2002, 53:232-235.
7. Burrell Q.L. Predicting future citation behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54(5):372-378.
8. Case D.O., Higgins G.M. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000, 51(7):635-645.
9. Cloete I., Zyl J.V. Fuzzy rule induction in a set covering framework. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2006, 14:93-110.
10. Danell R. Can the quality of scientific work be predicted using information on the author's track record?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(1):50-60.
11. Dubois D., Prade H. Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. General Systems 1990, 17:191-209.
12. Fu L., Aliferis C. Using content-based and bibliometric features for machine learning models to predict citation counts in the biomedical literature. Scientometrics 2010, 85:257-270.
13. Gates G.W. The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1972, 18:431-433.
14. Glänzel W. On the reliability of predictions based on stochastic citation processes. Scientometrics 1997, 40(3):481-492.
15. Glänzel W., Rinia E.J., Brocken M.G.M. A bibliometric study of highly cited European physics papers in the 80s. Research Evaluation 1995, 5(2):113-122.
16. Glänzel W., Schubert A. Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes. Information Processing & Management 1995, 31(1):69-80.
17. Glänzel W., Shilemmer B., Thijs B. Better later than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon. Scientometrics 2003, 58(3):571-586.
18. Hart P.E. The condensed nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 1968, 14:515-516.
19. Hewings A., Lillis T., Vladimirou D. Who's citing whose writings? A corpus based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2010, 9(2):102-115.
20. Hirsch J.E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
21. Hu Q.H., An S., Yu D.R. Soft fuzzy rough sets for robust feature evaluation and selection. Information Sciences 2010, 180:4384-4400.
22. Hu Q.H., Xie Z.X., Yu D.R. Hybrid attribute reduction based on a novel fuzzy-rough model and information granulation. Pattern Recognition 2007, 40:3509-3521.
23. Hu Q.H., Yu D.R., Xie Z.X. Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques. Pattern Recognition 2006, 27:414-423.
24. Jensen R., Shen Q. New approaches to fuzzy-rough feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2009, 17:824-838.
25. Jin X.B., Liu C.L., Hou X.W. Regularized margin-based conditional log-likelihood loss for prototype learning. Pattern Recognition 2010, 43:2428-2438.
26. Jorgenson M. A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort. Journal of Systems and Software 2004, 70:37-60.
27. Kim K. The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references. Scientometrics 2004, 59(1):79-93.
28. Kupinski M.A., Giger M.L. Feature selection with limited datasets. Medical Physics 1999, 26:2176-2182.
29. Kwak N., Choi C.H. Input feature selection by mutual information based on Parzen window. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1994, 24:1667-1671.
30. Laband D.N., Piette M.J. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy 1994, 102:194-203.
31. Levitt J.M., Thelwall M. Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2008, 59(12):1973-1984.
32. Li Y., Shiu S.C.K., Pal S.K. A rough set-based case-based reasoner for text categorization. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2006, 41:229-255.
33. Li Y., Shiu S.C.K., Pal S.K. Combining feature reduction and case selection in building CBR classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2006, 18:415-429.
34. Mitra P., Murthy C.A., Pal S.K. Density based multiscale data condensation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2002, 24:734-747.
35. Moed H.F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4(3):265-277.
36. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 1982, 11:341-356.
37. Penas C.S., Willett P. Gender differences in publication and citation counts in librarianship and information science research. Journal of Information Science 2006, 32(5):480-485.
38. Rong T., Martin A.S. Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation 2008, 64(2):246-272.
39. Symth B., Keane M. An application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction model. Expert Systems with Application 1998, 28:127-135.
40. Sagi I., Yechiam E. Amusing titles in scientific journals and article citation. Journal of Information Science 2008, 34(5):680-687.
41. Tomek I. An experiment with the edited nearest-neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1976, 6:448-452.
42. Van Dalen, Henkens H.P.K. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics 2001, 50:455-482.
43. Van Dalen, Henkens H.P.K. Signals in science - On the importance of signaling in gaining attention in science. Scientometrics 2005, 64(2):209-233.
44. Wang M.Y., Yu G., Yu D.R. Mining typical features for highly cited papers. Scientometrics 2011, 87(3):695-706.
45. Xia J.F., Myers R.L., Wihoite S.K. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 2011, 37(1):19-28.