The influence of body mass index and gender on coronary arterial attenuation with fixed iodine load per body weight at dual-source CT coronary angiography

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 637-642

  Zhu, Xiaomei ^a   Zhu, Yinsu ^a   Xu, Hai ^a   Tang, Lijun ^a   Xu, Yi ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Body weight; Contrast material; Coronary CT angiography

Indexed keywords

BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CONTRAST MATERIAL; CORONARY ARTERIES; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; DOSE CALCULATION; DUAL-SOURCE CT CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING; MEAN AGES; MEAN ARTERIAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANTHROPOMETRY; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; HEALTH; IODINE; MATERIALS;

HEART;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOHEXOL; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY WEIGHT; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SEX FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84864041056     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110657     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Xu Y, Tang L, Zhu X, et al. Comparison of dual-source CT coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26(Suppl. 1):75-81
2. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:147-54
3. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-7
4. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005;234:86-97
5. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-82
6. Fei X, Du X, Yang Q, et al. 64-MDCT coronary angiography: phantom study of effects of vascular attenuation on detection of coronary stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:43-9
7. Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF, et al. Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:777-84
8. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998;207:657-62
9. Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T, et al. Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1111-6
10. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, et al. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods. Korean J Radiol 2001;2:28-36
11. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S, et al. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest Radiol 1983;18:364-7
12. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, et al. Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995;195:353-7
13. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010;256:32-61
14. Suzuki H, Oshima H, Shiraki N, et al. Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study. Eur Radiol 2004;14:2099-104
15. Bader TR, Prokesch RW, Grabenwoger F. Timing of the hepatic arterial phase during contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the liver: assessment of normal values in 25 volunteers. Invest Radiol 2000;35:486-92
16. Kim MJ, Choi JY, Lim JS, et al. Optimal scan window for detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas during MDCT examination. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:198-206
17. Tang L, Zhu X, Xu Y, et al. Factors influencing delay time and coronary arterial density during coronary angiography with DSCT. Acta Radiol 2011;52:59-63
18. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008;29:191-7
19. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-60
20. Nakaura T, Awai K, Yauaga Y, et al. Contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography using a 64-detector scanner: comparison between patient weight-adjusted-and fixed iodine-dose protocols. Invest Radiol 2008;43:512-9
21. Seifarth H, Puesken M, Kalafut JF, et al. Introduction of an individually optimized protocol for the injection of contrast medium for coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2373-82
22. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A, et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003;38:690-4
23. Yamamuro M, Tadamura E, Kanao S, et al. Coronary angiography by 64-detector row computed tomography using low dose of contrast material with saline chaser: influence of total injection volume on vessel attenuation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:272-80
24. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. CT coronary angiography using 16 and 64 simultaneous detector rows: intraindividual comparison. Rofo 2007;179:581-6
25. Zhu X, Chen W, Li M, et al. Contrast material injection protocol with the flow rate adjusted to the heart rate for dual source CT coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 Oct. 4. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9950-y
26. Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 2004;230:142-50
27. Husmann L, Leschka S, Boehm T, et al. Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography. Rofo 2006;178:1007-13
28. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, et al. Determinants of vessel contrast in BMI-adapted low dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;25:625-30
29. Tatsugami F, Husmann L, Herzog BA, et al. Evaluation of a body mass index-adapted protocol for low-dose 64-MDCT coronary angiography with prospective ECG triggering. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:635-8