Influence of body mass index on coronary artery opacification in 64-slice CT angiography;Einfluss des bodymass-index auf den kontrast in den koronararterien mit der 64-schicht-CT

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1007-1013

  Husmann, L ^a   Leschka, S ^a   Boehm, T ^a   Desbiolles, L ^a   Schepis, T ^a   Koepfli, P ^a   Gaemperli, O ^a   Marincek, B ^a   Kaufmann, P ^b   Alkadhi, Hatem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Body mass index; Cardiac; CT angiography

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CALCULATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BODY MASS INDEX; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REFERENCE VALUES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS;

EID: 33751052497     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926871     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482-1487
2. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557
3. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147-154
4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318-2323
5. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R et al. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1803-1810
6. Stanford W, Burns TL, Thompson BH et al. Influence of body size and section level on calcium phantom measurements at coronary artery calcium CT scanning. Radiology 2004; 230: 198-205
7. Sevrukov A, Pratap A, Doss C et al. Electron beam tomography imaging of coronary calcium: the effect of body mass index on radiologic noise. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26: 592-597
8. Raggi P, Callister TQ, Cooil B. Calcium scoring of the coronary artery by electron beam CT: how to apply an individual attenuation threshold. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 497-502
9. Becker CR, Hong C, Knez A et al. Optimal contrast application for cardiac 4-detector-row computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 690-694
10. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 1998; 207: 657-662
11. Husmann L, Alkadhi H, Boehm T et al. Influence of cardiac hemodynamic parameters on coronary artery opacification with 64-slice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1-6
12. Ann Intern Med 1985; 103: 977-1077
13. Poll LW, Cohnen M, Brachten S et al. Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation ("ECG pulsing"): phantom measurements. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1500-1505
14. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B. Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25: 907-923
15. Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Schnorr J et al. Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 357-364
16. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 119-128
17. Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2004; 230: 403-410
18. Boehm T, Alkadhi H, Roffi M et al. Zeitbedarf, Untersucherabhä ngigkeit und Messgenauigkeit für die Bestimmung der linksventrikulären Ejektionsfraktion mit der 4-Zeilen-Multidetektor-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 529-537
19. Juergens KU, Fischbach R. Left ventricular function studied with MDCT. Eur Radiol 2005; 16: 342-357
20. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach GA. Grundlagen der linksventrikulä ren Funktionsanalyse mittels MRT und MSCT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1365-1379
21. Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M et al. Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 2005; 237: 213-223
22. Vehmas T, Kivisaari L, Huuskonen MS et al. Scoring CT/HRCT findings among asbestos-exposed workers: effects of patient's age, body mass index and common laboratory test results. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 213-219
23. Huda W, Scalzetti EM, Levin G. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT. Radiology 2000; 217: 430-435
24. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C et al. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 323-328
25. Ende JF, Huda W, Ros PR et al. Image mottle in abdominal CT. Invest Radiol 1999; 34: 282-286
26. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT et al. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose. Radiology 2004; 231: 169-174
27. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, van der Lugt A et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at helical 16-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of iodine concentration on vascular attenuation. Radiology 2005; 236: 661-665
28. Cademartiri F, van der Lugt A, Luccichenti G et al. Parameters affecting bolus geometry in CTA: a review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26: 598-607
29. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004; 233: 817-823
30. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2535-2538
31. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 2001; 357: 599-603
32. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2265-2270
33. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1043-1048
34. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1426-1431