Input-based tasks and the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar: A process-product study

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 253-279

  Shintani, Natsuko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

classroom interaction; focus on form; incidental grammar acquisition; input based tasks; process product study; task based language teaching; vocabulary acquisition; young L2 learners

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864029639     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168811431378     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Asher J.J.Learning another language through actions. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions; 1977:.
2. Berko J.The child's learning of English morphology.Word. 1958;14:150-77.
3. Brock C.A.The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse.TESOL Quarterly. 1986;20:47-59.
4. Broner M.A.,Tarone E.E.Is it fun?: Language play in a fifth-grade spanish immersion classroom.The Modern Language Journal. 2001;85:363-79.
5. De Jong N.Can second language grammar be learned through listening?: An experimental study.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2005;27:205-34.
6. De la Fuente M.J.Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2002;24:81-112.
7. DiCamilla F.J.,Antón M.Private speech: A study of language for thought in the collaborative interaction of language learners.International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2004;14:36-69.
8. Dulay H.C.,Burt M.K.Natural sequences in child second language acquisition.Language Learning. 1974;24:37-53.
9. Ellis R.Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins; 1999:.
10. Ellis R.Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
11. Ellis R.Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings.International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2009;19:221-46.
12. Ellis R.,He X.The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meanings.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1999;21:285-301.
13. Ellis R.,Heimbach R.Bugs and birds: Children's acquisition of second language vocabulary through interaction.System. 1997;25:247-59.
14. Ellis R.,Tanaka Y.,Yamazaki A.Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings.Language Learning. 1994;44:449-91.
15. Ellis R.,Heimbach R.,Tanaka Y.,Yamazaki A.Learning a second language through interaction. Ellis R., ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company; 1999:63-114.
16. Ernst G.Talking circle: Conversation and negotiation in the ESL classroom.TESOL Quarterly. 1994;28:293-322.
17. Gary J.O.,Gary N.Comprehension-based language instruction: Theory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1981;379:332-42.
18. Hakuta K.Second language acquisition. Hatch E., ed. Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1978:132-47.
19. Johnson K.Understanding communication in second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995:.
20. Krashen S.Oxford: Pergamon; 1981:.
21. Krashen S.Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon; 1982:.
22. Krashen S.The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London; New York: Longman; 1985:.
23. Krashen S.We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis.The Modern Language Journal. 1989;73:440-64.
24. Krashen S.Comprehensible output?.System. 1998;26:175-82.
25. Lantolf J.P.Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Kozulin A.Gindis B.Ageyev V.S.Miller S.M., ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003:349-70.
26. Long M.H.Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input.Applied Linguistics. 1983;4:126-41.
27. Loschky L.Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship?.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1994;16:303-23.
28. Loschky L.,Bley-Vroman R.Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Crookes G.Gass S., ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1993:123-67.
29. Markee N.Conversation analysis. Mahwah: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum:; 2000:.
30. McHoul A.The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.Language in Society. 1978;7:183-213.
31. Nagy W.Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Schmitt N.McCarthy M., ed. Cambridge: University Press; 1997:64-83.
32. Nation P.Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
33. Ohta A.S.Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001:.
34. Paradis M.A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins; 2004:.
35. Paribakht S.,Wesche M.B.Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Coady J.Huckin T., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997:174-200.
36. Paribakht S.The influence of first language lexicalization on second language lexical inferencing: A study of farsi-speaking learners of English as a foreign language.Language Learning. 2005;55:701-48.
37. Pienemann M.Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Hyltenstam K.Pienemann M., ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 1985:23-76.
38. Pinter A.Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Edwards C.Willis J., ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:113-26.
39. Prabhu N.S.Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987:.
40. Robinson P.Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, & Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton & Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2005;27:235-68.
41. Seedhouse P.The organization of turn taking and sequence in language classrooms.Language Learning. 2004;54:101-40.
42. Shintani N.A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners.Language Teaching Research. 2011a;15:137-58.
43. Shintani N.Task-based language teaching vs. traditional production-based instruction: Do they result in different classroom processes?.University of Sydney Papers in TESOL. 2011b;6:1-24.
44. Shintani N.,Ellis R.The incidental acquisition of English plural -s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 2010;32:607-37.
45. Sinclair J.M.,Coulthard M.Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press; 1975:.
46. Swain M.Input in second language acquisition. Gass S.Madden C., ed. Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1985:235-56.
47. Swan M.Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction.Applied Linguistics. 2005;26:376-401.
48. Tinkham T.The effect of semantic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary.System. 1993;21:371-80.
49. Tono Y.A computer learner corpus based analysis of the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective: The 3rd International Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora; 2000; 2000. 123.
50. VanPatten B.Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1996:.
51. Van den Branden K.Effects of negotiation on language learners' output.Language Learning. 1997;47:589-636.
52. VanPatten B.,Cadierno T.Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction.The Modern Language Journal. 1993;77:45-57.
53. VanPatten B.,Oikkenon S.Explanation vs. structured input in processing instruction.Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1996;18:495-510.