Electrocochleography during cochlear implantation for hearing preservation

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 146, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 774-781

  Mandalà, Marco ^a   Colletti, Liliana ^a   Tonoli, Giovanni ^a   Colletti, Vittorio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

cochlear implant; electrocochleography; hearing preservation; intraoperative; monitoring

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SURGICAL PATIENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT MONITORING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864023822     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811435895     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, Roberson JB. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 ; 125: 870-876 (Pubitemid 41224108)
2. Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, et al. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurootol. 2006 ; 11: 42-48 (Pubitemid 44629842)
3. Adunka OF, Pillsbury HC, Kiefer J. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation: fact or fantasy?. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 ; 126: 475-482
4. Kontorinis G, Lenarz T, Stöver T, Paasche G. Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces. Otol Neurotol. 2011 ; 32: 565-750
5. Skarzyski H, Lorens A, D'Haese P, et al. Preservation of residual hearing in children and post-lingually deafened adults after cochlear implantation: an initial study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2002 ; 64: 247-253
6. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope. 2003 ; 113: 1726-1730 (Pubitemid 37210974)
7. James C, Albegger K, Battmer R, et al. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005 ; 125: 481-491 (Pubitemid 40676887)
8. Yao WN, Turner CW, Gantz BJ. Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 ; 49: 1085-1090
9. Gstoettner WK, van de, Heyning P, O'Connor AF, et al. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 ; 128: 968-975
10. Brown RF, Hullar TE, Cadieux JH, Chole RA. Residual hearing preservation after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2010 ; 31: 1221-1226
11. Helbig S, Van de, Heyning P, Kiefer J, et al. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 ; 131: 585-595
12. Postelmans JT, van Spronsen E, Grolman W, et al. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing?. Laryngoscope. 2011 ; 121: 1794-1799
13. Campbell AP, Suberman TA, Buchman CA, Fitzpatrick DC, Adunka OF. Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring. Otol Neurotol. 2010 ; 31: 1391-1398
14. Oghalai JS, Tonini R, Rasmus J, et al. Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2009 ; 10: 1-18
15. Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Mocella S, Policante Z. ECochG, CNAP and ABR monitoring during vestibular Schwannoma surgery. Audiology. 1998 ; 37: 27-37 (Pubitemid 28045092)
16. Picton TW, Durieux-Smith A, Champagne SC, et al. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 ; 9: 315-331
17. Rance G, Rickards F. Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 ; 13: 236-245 (Pubitemid 34918910)
18. Cone-Wesson B, Dowell RC, Tomlin D, Rance G, Ming WJ. The auditory steady-state response: comparisons with the auditory brainstem response. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002 ; 13: 173-187 (Pubitemid 34692912)
19. Dallos P, Cheatham MA. Travel time in the cochlea and its determination from cochlear-microphonic data. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 ; 49: 1140+
20. Dallos P, Schoeny ZG, Cheatham MA. On the limitations of cochlear-microphonic measurements. J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 ; 49: 1144+