An integrated attitude model of self-service technologies: Evidence from online stock trading systems brokers

Service Industries Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1823-1835

  Liu, Shu Fang ^a   Huang, Li Shia ^b   Chiou, Yu Hsiu ^c  

^a NATIONAL KAOHSIUNG UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

^b FU JEN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c TAKMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

category based affect; self service technology; technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTERNET; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; STOCK MARKET; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84864000819     PISSN: 02642069     EISSN: 17439507     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2011.574695     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R. M. 2000. Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy-An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4): 418-430.
2. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bawden, D. 2001. Information and digital literacy: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2): 218-259.
4. Bobbitt, L. M. and Dabholkar, P. A. 2001. Integrating attitudinal theories to understand and predict use of technology-based self-service the internet as an illustration. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12: 423-450.
5. Brown, T. J., Churchill, G. A. and Peter, J. P. 1993. Research note: Improving measurement of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 69: 127-139.
6. Compeau, D. R. and Higgins, C. A. 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19: 189-211.
7. Dabholkar, P. A. 1994. Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 21: 100-118.
8. Dabholkar, P. A. 1996. Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 29-51.
9. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 318-339.
10. Davis, F. D. and Venkatesh, V. 1996. A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the TAM: Three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45: 19-45.
11. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Fiske, S. T. Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition. Affect and cognition, Edited by: Clark, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. pp.55-78. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-50.
14. Gatingon, H. and Robertson, T. S. 1991. "Innovative decision processes". In Handbook of consumer behaviour, Edited by: Thomas, S. R. and Kassarjian, H. H. 316-348. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Globerson, S. and Maggard, M. J. 1991. A conceptual model of self-service. International Journal of Operation and Production Management, 11: 33-43.
16. Hair, J. F., Andersen, R. L. and Tatham, W. C.B. 1998. Multivariate data analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17. Igbaria, M. and Iivari, J. 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Journal of Management Science, 23(6): 587-605.
18. Jones, L. B. 1992. Linking undergraduate education and libraries: Minnesota's Approach. Direct for Higher Education, 78: 27-35.
19. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. and Widaman, K. F. 2002. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 151-173.
20. McClure, C. R. 1994. Network literacy: A role for libraries?. Information Technology and Libraries, 13(2): 115-125.
21. Meuter, M.L., & Bitner, M.L. (1998). Self-service technologies: Extending service frameworks and identifying issues for research. In D. Grewal & C. Pechman (Eds.), AMA Winter Educator's Conference Proceedings: Marketing Theory and Applications and Applications (pp. 9, 12-19). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
22. Meuter, M. L., Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L. and Brown, S. W. 2005. Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. Journal of Marketing, 69: 61-83.
23. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L. and Bitner, M. 2000. Self-service technology: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 64: 50-64.
24. Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J. and Roundtree, R. 2003. The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, 56(11): 899-906.
25. Mick, D. G. and Fournier, S. 1998. Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25: 123-143.
26. Oliver, R. J. 1997. Satisfaction: A behavioural perspective on the customer, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320.
28. Pikkarainer, T., Pikkarainer, K., Karjaluoto, H. and Pahnila, S. 2004. Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3): 224-235.
29. Scott, C. R. and Rockwell, S. C. 1997. The defect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46: 44-62.
30. Shamdasani, P., Mukherjee, A. and Malhotra, N. 2008. Antecedents and consequences of service quality in consumer evaluation of self-service internet technologies. The Service Industries Journal, 28(1): 117-138.
31. Sujan, M. 1985. Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12: 31-46.
32. Sun, H. and Zhang, P. 2006. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64: 53-78.
33. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. 1995. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19: 561-570.
34. Tolstoy, D. 2010. Knowledge combination in networks: Evidence from the international venturing of four small biotech firms. International Entrepreneur and Management Journal, 6(2): 183-202.
35. Torkzadeh, G. and Koufteros, X. 1994. Factorial validity of a computer self-efficacy scale and the impact of computer training. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3): 813-821.
36. Ullah, F., Abbas, Q. and Akbar, S. 2010. The relevance of pecking order hypothesis for the financing of computer software and biotechnology small firms: Some UK evidence. International Entrepreneur and Management Journal, 6(3): 301-315.
37. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 1996. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27: 451-481.
38. Yu, C. S. 2008. Assessing and differentiation the quality of internet-based services: A case of online banking in Taiwan. The Service Industries Journal, 28(5): 581-602.
39. Zurkowski, P. G. 1974. The information service environment: Relationships and priorities, Washington, DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science.