Trust Incident Account Model: Preliminary Indicators for Trust Rhetoric and Trust or Distrust in Blogs

Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 300-303

  Rubin, Victoria L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOGS; DATA MINING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; FINER GRAINS; OPINION MINING; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SHARP CONTRAST; SOCIAL RELATIONS; TECHNOLOGY TRUSTS;

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84863991729     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13990     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Artz, D., and Gil, Y. 2007. A Survey of Trust in Computer Science & the Semantic Web. Web Semantics, 5(2): 58-71.
2. th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 617-624, Bremen, Germany: ACM.
3. Hardin, R. 1993. The Street-Level Epistemology of Trust. Politics & Society, 21(3): 505-529.
4. Kale, A., Karandikar, A., Kolari, P., Java, A., Joshi, A., and Finin, T. 2007. Modeling Trust and Influence in the Blogosphere Using Link Polarity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
5. th Intenational Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1367-1373, Switzerland: ACL.
6. Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Lewicki, R. J., and Bunker, B. B. 1996. Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In R. M. Kramer and T. R. Tyler. eds. Trust in Organizations: 114-139. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8. Marsh, S., and Dibben, M. R. 2003. The Role of Trust in Information Science and Technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1): 465-498.
9. Marshall, A. 1919. Industry & Trade. London: Macmillan.
10. Mihalcea, R., and Liu, H. 2006. A Corpus-Based Approach to Finding Happiness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: AAAI Press.
11. Minsky, M. 1974. A Framework for Representing Knowledge. In P. Winston. ed. The Psychology of Computer Vision: 211-277. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12. Möllering, G. 2006. Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13. Pang, B., and Lee, L. 2008. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1-2): 1-135.
14. Punch, K. F. 1998. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.
15. Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., and Friedman, E. 2000. Reputation Systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12): 45-48.
16. Riloff, E., and Wiebe, J. 2003. Learning Extraction Patterns for Subjective Expressions. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in NLP, 105-112: ACL.
17. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. 1998. Not So Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust. The Acad. of Manag. Rev., 23(3): 393-404.
18. Rubin, V. L. 2007. Stating with Certainty or Stating with Doubt: Intercoder Reliability Results for Manual Annotation of Epistemically Modalized Statements. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies Conference, 141-144, Buffalo, NY.
19. Rubin, V. L., and Liddy, E. 2006. Assessing Credibility of Weblogs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs: AAAI.
20. th International Language Resources and Evaluation, Marrakech, Morocco.
21. Zucker, L. G. 1986. Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840-1920. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings. eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 53-111. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.