Identification of Paramecium bursaria Syngens through Molecular Markers - Comparative Analysis of Three Loci in the Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA

Protist

Volumn 163, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 671-685

  Greczek Stachura, Magdalena ^a   Potekhin, Alexey ^b   Przyboś, Ewa ^c   Rautian, Maria ^b   Skoblo, Inna ^b   Tarcz, Sebastian ^c  

^a PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^b ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION OF ANIMALS   (Poland)

Author keywords

COI mtDNA; Histone H4; Molecular phylogeny; Paramecium bursaria syngens; RDNA.

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PROTOZOAL DNA; PROTOZOAL RNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 5.8S;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PARAMECIUM; PHYLOGENY; RNA GENE;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; DNA, PROTOZOAN; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; GENES, RRNA; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PARAMECIUM; PHYLOGENY; RNA, PROTOZOAN; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5.8S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

PARAMECIUM; PARAMECIUM AURELIA; PARAMECIUM BURSARIA;

EID: 84863991524     PISSN: 14344610     EISSN: 16180941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2011.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allen S.L., Adams J., Rushford C.L. Interspecies relationship in the Paramecium aurelia complex acid phosphatase variation. J Protozool 1983, 30:143-147.
2. Barth D., Krenek S., Fokin S.I., Berendonk T.U. Intraspecific genetic variation in Paramecium revealed by mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase I sequences. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2006, 53:20-25.
3. Barth D., Przyboś E., Fokin S.I., Schlegel M., Berendonk T.U. Cytochrome b sequence data suggest rapid speciation within the Paramecium aurelia species complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2008, 49:669-673.
4. Bernhard D., Schlegel M. Evolution of histone H3 and H4 genes in different ciliate lineages. J Mol Evol 1998, 46:344-354.
5. Bomford R (1965) Changes in Mating Type in Paramecium. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Protozoology 251 London Excerpta Medica.
6. Bomford R. The syngens of Paramecium bursaria. New mating types and intersyngenic mating reactions. J Protozool 1966, 13:497.
7. Catania F., Wurmser F., Potekhin A., Przyboś E., Lynch M. Genetic diversity in the Paramecium aurelia species complex. Mol Biol Evol 2009, 26:421-431.
8. Chantangsi C., Lynn D.H. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Tetrahymena interfered from the cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 and the small subunit ribosomal RNA genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2008, 49:979-987.
9. Chen T. Varieties and mating types in Paramecium bursaria I. New variety and types from England, Ireland and Czechoslovakia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1946, 32:173-181.
10. Chen T. Varieties and mating types in Paramecium bursaria II. Variety and mating types found in China. J Exp Zool 1956, 132:266-268.
11. Coleman A.W. Paramecium aurelia revisited. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2005, 52:68-77.
12. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39:783-791.
13. Fenchel T., Finlay B.J. Is microbial diversity fundamentally different from biodiversity of larger animals and plants?. Eur J Protistol 2003, 39:486-490.
14. Fenchel T., Finlay B.J. The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. BioScience 2004, 54:777-784.
15. Finlay B.J., Esteban G.F., Brown S., Fenchel T., Hoef-Emden K. Multiple cosmopolitan ecotypes within a microbial eukaryote morphospecies. Protist 2006, 157:377-390.
16. Foissner W. Protist diversity: estimates of the near-imponderable. Protist 1999, 150:363-368.
17. Foissner W. Biogeography and dispersal of micro-organisms: A review emphasizing protists. Acta Protozool 2006, 45:111-136.
18. Foissner W. Protist diversity and distribution some basic considerations. Biodivers Conserv 2008, 17:235-242.
19. Fokin S.I., Przyboś E., Chivilev S.M., Beier C.L., Hori M., Skotarczak B., Wodecka B., Fijushima M. Morphological and molecular investigations of Paramecium schewiakoffi nov. spec. (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophoera) and current status of Paramecium distribution and taxonomy of Paramecium spp. Eur J Protistol 2004, 40:225-243.
20. Greczek-Stachura M., Tarcz S., Przyboś E. Intra-specific differentiation of Paramecium bursaria strains by molecular methods - preliminary studies. Folia Biol (Kraków) 2010, 58:35-45.
21. Hall T.A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, 41:95-98.
22. Hoshina R., Hayashi S., Imamura N. Intraspecific genetic divergence of Paramecium bursaria and re-construction of the paramecian phylogenetic tree. Acta Protozool 2006, 45:377-386.
23. Jennings H.S. Sex reaction types and their interrelations in Paramecium bursaria I. Proc Natl. Acad Sci USA 1938, 24:112-117.
24. Jennings H.S. Genetics of Paramecium bursaria. II. Self-differentiation and self-fertilization of clones. Proc Am Philos Soc 1941, 85:25.
25. Jennings H.S., Opitz P. Genetics of Paramecium bursaria IV. A fourth variety from Russia. Lethal crosses with an American variety. Genetics 1944, 29:576-583.
26. Kawano T., Kadono T., Kosaka T., Hosoya H. Green paramecia as an evolutionary winner of oxidative symbiosis: A hypothesis and supportive data. Z. Naturforsch 2004, 59c:538-542.
27. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120.
28. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1451-1452.
29. Nei M., Kumar S. Molecular Eevolution and Phylogenetics 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Lynn D.H. The Ciliated Protozoa. Characterization, Classification, and Guide to the Literature 2008, Springer Publ, New York. 3rd ed.
31. Lynn D.H., Strüder-Kypke M.C. Species of Tetrahymena identical by small subunit rRNA gene sequences are discriminated by mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene sequences. J Eukaryot Microbiol 2006, 53:385-387.
32. Maciejewska A. Relationships of new sibling species of Paramecium jenningsi based on sequences of the histone H4 gene fragment. Eur J Protistol 2007, 43:125-130.
33. Page R.D.M. Tree View: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Bioinformatics 1996, 12:357-358.
34. Posada D. Model Test Server: a web-based tool for the statistical selection of models of nucleotide substitution online. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:W700-W703.
35. Potekhin A., Przyboś E., Nekrasova I., Yashchenko V., Rautian M. Species of the Paramecium aurelia complex in Russia: new stands and overall distribution. Folia Biol (Kraków) 2010, 58:73-78.
36. Przyboś E. Interspecies differentiation of Paramecium sexaurelia (Ciliophora). Arch Protistenkd 1990, 138:123-125.
37. Przyboś E. Recent data on the occurrence of species of the Paramecium aurelia complex in Europe. Folia Biol (Kraków) 2005, 53:61-63.
38. Przyboś E., Fokin S. Data on the occurrence of species of the Paramecium aurelia complex world-wide. Protistology 2000, 1:179-184.
39. Przyboś E., Surmacz M. New, world-wide data on the distribution of species of the Paramecium aurelia complex (Ciliophora, Protozoa). Folia Biol (Kraków) 2010, 58:185-188.
40. Przyboś E., Hori M., Fokin S.J. Strains of Paramecium quadecaurelia from Namibia, Africa: genetic and molecular studies. Acta Protozool 2003, 42:357-360.
41. Przyboś E., Rautian M., Potekhin A. First European record of Paramecium septaurelia and the discovery of new European habitats of P. pentaurelia and P. sexaurelia in Russia (Astrakhan and Volgograd regions). Folia Biol (Kraków) 2004, 52:1-4.
42. Przyboś E., Rautian M., Potekhin A. Species of the Paramecium aurelia complex in Russia, Lower Volga Basin. Protistology 2005, 4:92-96.
43. Przyboś E., Rautian M., Greczek-Stachura M., Potekhin A. Polymorphism within Paramecium sexaurelia (Ciliophora, Oligohymenophorea) and description of a new stand of the species in China. Folia Biol (Kraków) 2007, 55:121-125.
44. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
45. Sadler L.A., Brunk C.F. Phylogenetic relationships and unusual diversity in histone H4 proteins within the Tetrahymena pyriformis complex. Mol Biol Evol 1992, 9:70-84.
46. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
47. Siegel R. New results on the genetic of mating types in Paramecium bursaria. Genet Res 1963, 4:132.
48. Siegel R.W., Larison L.L. The genetic control of mating types in Paramecium bursaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1960, 46:344.
49. Sonneborn T.M. Sex, sex inheritance and sex determination in Paramecium aurelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1937, 23:378-395.
50. Sonneborn T.M. Paramecium aurelia: mating types and groups, lethal interactions; determination and inheritance. Am Nat 1939, 73:390-413.
51. Sonneborn TM (1957) Breeding Systems, Reproductive Methods and Species Problems in Protozoa. In Mayer E (ed) The Species Problem. AAAS, Washington, pp 155-324.
52. Sonneborn T.M. Methods in Paramecium Research. Methods in Cell Physiology 1970, 241-339. Academic Press, New York London. D.M. Prescott (Ed.).
53. Sonneborn T.M. The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Trans Am Microsc Soc 1975, 94:155-178.
54. Strüder-Kypke M.C., Lynn D.H. Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene in ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) and evaluation of its suitability as a biodiversity marker. Syst Biodivers 2010, 8:131-148.
55. Strüder-Kypke M.C., Wright A.D., Fokin S.I., Lynn D.H. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Paramecium inferred from small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2000, 14:122-130.
56. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
57. Tamura KJ, Dudley M, Nei (2007) Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596-1599.
58. Tamura K M, Nei, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11030-11035.
59. Tanaka M., Miwa I. Significance of photosynthetic products of symbiotic Chlorella to establish the endosymbiosis and to express the mating reactivity rhythm in Paramecium bursaria. Zool Sci 1996, 13:685-692.
60. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680.
61. Tonooka Y., Watanabe T. Genetics of the relationship between the ciliate Paramecium bursaria and its symbiotic algae. Invert Biol 2007, 126:287-294.
62. Wichtermann R. The Biology of Paramecium 1986, Plenum Press, New York. 2nd edn.
63. Yanagi A. Autogamy is induced in Paramecium bursaria by methyl cellulose. Eur J Protistol 2004, 40:313-315.