The impact of multiple biopsies on outcomes of nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

International Journal of Impotence Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 161-164

  Sooriakumaran, P ^a   Calaway, A ^a   Sagalovich, D ^a   Roy, S ^a   Srivastava, A ^a   Joneja, J ^a   Shevchuk, M ^a   Tewari, A K ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

multiple biopsy; outcome; potency; prostatectomy; robotic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURGERY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR BIOPSY;

AGED; BIOPSY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURIES; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84863988700     PISSN: 09559930     EISSN: 14765489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2012.9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2010; 60: 277-300.
2. Fujita K, Landis P, McNeil BK, Pavlovich CP. Serial prostate biopsies are associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance. J Urol 2009; 182: 2664-2669.
3. Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2001; 165: 445-454. (Pubitemid 32060434)
4. Raaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schrder FH. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002; 60: 826-830. (Pubitemid 35300348)
5. Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Cooper A, Siegel Y, Lindner A. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of voiding impairment. J Urol 2001; 166: 2242-2246. (Pubitemid 33065266)
6. Ochiai A, Babaian RJ. Update on prostate biopsy technique. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14: 157-162. (Pubitemid 38582314)
7. Eichler K, Hempel S, Wilby J, Myers L, Bachmann LM, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J Urol 2006; 175: 1605-1612.
8. Ikonen S, Karkkainen P, Kivisaari L, Salo JO, Taari K, Vehmas T et al. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostatic cancer: comparison between fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin echo and three-dimensional dual-echo, steady-state sequences. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 236-241. (Pubitemid 32755442)
9. Lavery HJ, Levinson AW, Brajtbord JS, Samadi DB. Candidacy for active surveillance may be associated with improved functional outcomes after prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2011, e-pub ahead of print.
10. Tuncel A, Kirilmaz U, Nalcacioglu V, Aslan Y, Polat F, Atan A. The impact of transrectal prostate needle biopsy on sexuality in men and their female partners. Urology 2008; 71: 1128-1131.
11. Akbal C, Turker P, Tavukcu HH, Simsek F, Turkeri L. Erectile function in prostate cancer-free patients who underwent prostate saturation biopsy. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 540-544.