Sensory evoked potentials to predict short-term progression of disability in multiple sclerosis

Neurological Sciences

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 887-892

  Margaritella, N ^a   Mendozzi, L ^b   Garegnani, M ^a   Colicino, E ^c   Gilardi, E ^a   DeLeonardis, L ^a   Tronci, F ^b   Pugnetti, L ^a  

^a IRCCS FONDAZIONE DON CARLO GNOCCHI   (Italy)

^b Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation Unit   (Italy)

^c BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Evoked potentials; Multiple sclerosis; Multivariate analysis; Predictors of disability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; DISEASE COURSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EXPANDED DISABILITY STATUS SCALE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIMODAL SENSORY EVOKED POTENTIAL; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARAMETRIC TEST; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSATION;

EID: 84863984915     PISSN: 15901874     EISSN: 15903478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-011-0862-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Jung P, Beyerle A, Ziemann U (2008) Multimodal evoked potentials measure and predict disability progression in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 14:553-556 (Pubitemid 351943871)
2. Kallmann BA, Fackelmann S, Toyka KV, Rieckmann P, Reiners K (2006) Early abnormalities of evoked potentials and future disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 12:58-65 (Pubitemid 43169238)
3. Bergamaschi R (2007) Prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis. Int Rev Neurobiol 79:423-447
4. Leocani L,RovarisM, Boneschi FMet al (2006) Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77 (9):1030-1035 (Pubitemid 44338523)
5. Hume AL, Waxman SG (1988) Evoked potentials in suspected multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value and prediction of clinical course. J Neurol Sci 83:191-210 (Pubitemid 18043012)
6. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the ''McDonald Criteria''. Ann Neurol 58:840-846 (Pubitemid 41746873)
7. Mcdonald WI, Compston A, Edan G et al (2001) Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 50 (1):121-127
8. Poser C, Paty D, Scheinberg L et al (1983) New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 13 (3):227-231 (Pubitemid 13158528)
9. Chiappa KH (1990) Evoked potentials in clinical medicine, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York
10. Chen X, Ender P, Mitchell M, Wells C (2003) Regression with Stata, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/webbooks/reg/default.htm
11. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A (2005) Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Stata Press, College Station
12. Freedman DA (2006) On the so-called 'Huber Sandwich Estimator' and 'robust' standard errors. Amer Stat 60:299-302 (Pubitemid 44727237)
13. Burnham KP, Anderson D (2004) Multimodel inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33 (2):261-304 (Pubitemid 39519124)
14. Fuhr P, Borggrefe-Chappuis A, Schindler C, Kappos L (2001) Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 124:2162-2168 (Pubitemid 33055361)
15. Madsen JB, Yang ZB (1998) Asymmetric price adjustment in a menu-cost model. J Econ 68 (3):295-309 (Pubitemid 128541273)
16. Deloire M, Ruet A, Hamel M, Bonnet M, Brochet B (2010) Early cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis predicts disability outcome several years later. Mult Scler 16 (5):581-587
17. Yaldizli O, Atefy R, Gass A et al (2010) Corpus callosum index and long term disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 257:1256-1264
18. Leocani L, Medaglini S, Comi G (2001) Evoked potentials in monitoring multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 21 (2):889-891
19. Djuric J, Djuric DV, Zivkovic M et al (2010) Are somatosensory evoked potentials of the tibial nerve the most sensitive test in diagnosis multiple sclerosis? Neurol India 58 (4):537-541
20. Freedman MS, Patry DG, Grand Maison F et al (2004) Treatment optimization in multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 31:157-168 (Pubitemid 38724807)
21. Vercellino M, Romagnolo A, Mattioda A et al (2009) Multiple sclerosis relapses: a multivariable analysis of residual disability determinants. Acta Neurol Scand 119:126-130
22. Kaufman MD, Lee R, Norton H (2010) Course of relapsingremitting multiple sclerosis before, during and after natalizumab. Mult Scler. doi:10.1177/ 1352458510389103
23. Meuth SG, Bittner S, Seiler C, Gobel K, Wiendl H (2010) Natalizumab restores evoked potential abnormalities in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. doi:10.1177/1352458510386998