Detecting the potential sympatric range and niche divergence between Asian endemic ungulates of Procapra

Naturwissenschaften

Volumn 99, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 553-565

  Hu, Junhua ^a,b   Jiang, Zhigang ^b  

^a CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Gazelle; Maxent; Niche evolution; Species distribution modeling; Study region extent; Sympatric distribution

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGION; COEXISTENCE; ENDEMIC SPECIES; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; NICHE PARTITIONING; PHYLOGENETICS; RUMINANT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ASIA; BOVIDS; CLIMATE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FORECASTING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; ASIA; CLIMATE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; FORECASTING; RUMINANTS;

CAUDATA; GAZELLA; PROCAPRA; PROCAPRA GUTTUROSA; PROCAPRA PRZEWALSKII; UNGULATA;

EID: 84863984620     PISSN: 00281042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0933-1     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Acevedo P, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM, Real R (2012) Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling. Journal of Biogeography. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02713.x
2. Acevedo P, Ward AI, Real R, Smith GC (2010) Assessing biogeo graphical relationships of ecologically related species using favourability functions: a case study on British deer. Divers Dis trib 16:515-528
3. Anderson RP, Peterson AT, Gomez-Laverde M (2002) Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 98:3-16 (Pubitemid 34877834)
4. Anderson RP, Raza A (2010) The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. J Biogeogr 37:1378- 1393
5. Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:743-753 (Pubitemid 47602777)
6. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42-47 (Pubitemid 44959170)
7. Bahn V, McGill BJ (2007) Can niche-based distribution models outperform spatial interpolation? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:733-742 (Pubitemid 47593556)
8. Barton N (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551-558
9. Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A, Lira-Noriega A, Maher SP, Peterson AT, Soberón J, Villalobos F (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Modell 222:1810-1819
10. Braunisch V, Suchant R (2010) Predicting species distributions based on incomplete survey data: the trade-off between precision and scale. Ecography 33:826-840
11. Buckley LB, Davies TJ, Ackerly DD et al (2010) Phylogeny, niche conservatism and the latitudinal diversity gradient in mammals. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 277:2131-2138
12. Chefaoui RM, Lobo JM (2008) Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance. Ecol Modell 210:478-486 (Pubitemid 350299678)
13. Clark EL, Munkhbat J, Dulamtseren S, Baillie JEM, Batsaikhan N, King SRB, Samiya R, Stubbe M (2006) Summary conservation action plans for Mongolian mammals. Zoological Society of London, London
14. Costa GC, Schlupp I (2010) Biogeography of the Amazon molly: ecological niche and range limits of an asexual hybrid species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:442-451
15. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U (2003) Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421:259-264 (Pubitemid 36139128)
16. Duncan RP, Cassey P, Blackburn TM (2009) Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 276:1449-1457
17. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129-151
18. GLC (2003) Global Land Cover 2000 database. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. . Cited 10 Oct 2009
19. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993-1009 (Pubitemid 41247275)
20. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965-1978 (Pubitemid 43013915)
21. Hu J, Hu H, Jiang Z (2010a) The impacts of climate change on the wintering distribution of an endangered migratory bird. Oecologia 164:555-565
22. Hu J, Jiang Z (2010) Predicting the potential distribution of the endangered Przewalski's gazelle. J Zool 282:54-63
23. Hu J, Jiang Z (2011) Climate change hastens the conservation urgency of an endangered ungulate. PLoS One 6:e22873
24. Hu J, Ping X, Cai J, Li Z, Li C, Jiang Z (2010b) Do local communities support the conservation of endangered Przewalski's gazelle? Eur J Wildl Res 56:551-560
25. IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group (2008) Procapra przewalskii. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2010
26. Jiang Z (2004) Przewalski's Gazelle. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing
27. Lawler JJ, Shafer SL, White D, Kareiva P, Maurer EP, Blaustein AR, Bartlein PJ (2009) Projected climate-induced faunal change in the Western Hemisphere. Ecology 90:588-597
28. Lei R, Jiang Z, Hu Z, Yang W (2004) Taxonomic status of Procapra and the classification of Chinese antelopes and gazelles. Acta Zootaxon Sin 29:622-627
29. Li Z, Jiang Z, Beauchamp G (2010) Nonrandom mixing between groups of Przewalski's gazelle and Tibetan gazelle. J Mammal 91:674-680
30. Li Z, Jiang Z, Li C (2008) Dietary overlap of Przewalski's gazelle, Tibetan gazelle, and Tibetan sheep on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J Wildl Manage 72:944-948 (Pubitemid 351656367)
31. Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Real R (2008) AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:145-151 (Pubitemid 351228538)
32. Lomolino M, Riddle B, Brown J (2006) Biogeography. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
33. Mallon DP (2008) Procapra gutturosa. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN 2010 Version 2010.4. Available at: http:// www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 21 Dec 2010
34. Mallon DP, Bhatnagar YV (2008) Procapra picticaudata. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN 2010. Version 2010.4. Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 21 Dec 2010
35. Mallon DP, Jiang Z (2009) Grazers on the plains: challenges and prospects for large herbivores in Central Asia. J Appl Ecol 46:516-519
36. Martínez-Freiría F, Sillero N, Lizana M, Brito JC (2008) GIS-based niche models identify environmental correlates sustaining a contact zone between three species of European vipers. Divers Distrib 14:452-461 (Pubitemid 351533645)
37. Olson KA, Fuller TK, Mueller T, Murray MG, Nicolson C, Odonkhuu D, Bolortsetseg S, Schaller GB (2010) Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: nomads in the Eastern Steppe. J Arid Environ 74:1435-1442
38. Orr MR, Smith TB (1998) Ecology and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 13:502-506 (Pubitemid 28547330)
39. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361-371
40. Peterson AT, Soberón J, Sánchez-Cordero V (1999) Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285:1265-1267 (Pubitemid 29398613)
41. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell 190:231-259 (Pubitemid 41680650)
42. Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31:161-175 (Pubitemid 351457533)
43. Putman R (1996) Competition and resource partitioning in temperate ungulate assemblies. Chapman & Hall, London
44. Real R, Barbosa AM, Rodríguez A, García FJ, Vargas JM, Palomo LJ, Delibes M (2009) Conservation biogeography of ecologically interacting species: the case of the Iberian lynx and the European rabbit. Divers Distrib 15:390-400
45. Rundle HD, Nosil P (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8:336-352 (Pubitemid 40393919)
46. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G (2002) The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52:891-904 (Pubitemid 35181479)
47. Schaller G (1998) Wildlife of the Tibetan steppe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
48. Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737-741
49. Svenning JC, Normand S, Kageyama M (2008) Glacial refugia of temperate trees in Europe: insights from species distribution modelling. J Ecol 96:1117-1127
50. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA (2001) Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 16:330-343 (Pubitemid 32525773)
51. Turner M, Gardner R, O'Neill R (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag, New York
52. USGS (2009) HYDRO1k elevation derivative database. . Cited December 2008
53. Van Horn B (2002) Approaches to habitat modeling: the tensions between pattern and process and between specificity and generality. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Haufler JB et al (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Island Press, Washington, pp 63-72
54. VanDerWal J, Shoo LP, Graham C, William SE (2009) Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? Ecol Modell 220:589-594
55. Wake DB, Hadly EA, Ackerly DD (2009) Biogeography, changing climates, and niche evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19631-19636
56. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62:2868-2883
57. Wiens J (2002) Predicting species occurrences: progress, problems, and prospects. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Haufler JB et al (eds) Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, pp 739-749