Clinically relevant pancreas-related infectious complication after pancreaticoenteral anastomosis could be predicted by the parameters obtained on postoperative day 3

Pancreas

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 916-921

  Noji, Takehiro ^a,b   Nakamura, Toru ^a   Ambo, Yoshiyasu ^a   Suzuki, On ^a   Nakamura, Fumitaka ^a   Kishida, Akihiro ^a   Hirano, Satoshi ^b   Kondo, Satoshi ^b   Kashimura, Nobuichi ^a  

^a TEINE KEIJINKAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

pancreatic fistula; pancreaticoduodenectomy; pancreaticoenteral anastomosis; surgical site infection

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BODY TEMPERATURE; DELAYED GASTRIC EMPTYING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS DUCT; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREAS RELATED INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOENTERAL ANASTOMOSIS; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; STOMACH EMPTYING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMYLASES; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BODY TEMPERATURE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863981778     PISSN: 08853177     EISSN: 15364828     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e31823e7705     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bassi C, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions. Dig Surg. 2004;21(1):54Y59.
2. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8Y13.
3. Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, et al. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):207Y214.
4. BuchlerMW,Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg. 2003;138(12):1310Y1314; discussion 1315.
5. Butturini G, Daskalaki D, Molinari E, et al. Pancreatic fistula: definition and current problems. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(3):247Y251.
6. Daskalaki D, Butturini G, Molinari E, et al. A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 755 consecutive patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(1):91Y98.
7. Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H, et al. Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(4):601Y608.
8. Kawai M, Tani M, Hirono S, et al. How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?Van analysis in 244 consecutive patients. World J Surg. 2009;33(12): 2670Y2678.
9. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):1Y7.
10. Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G, et al. Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):849Y854; discussion 854Y856.
11. McPhee JT, Hill JS, Whalen GF, et al. Perioperative mortality for pancreatectomy: a national perspective. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2): 246Y253.
12. Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R, et al. Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula: results of a prospective study in 137 patients. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2): 281Y287.
13. Reid-Lombardo KM, Farnell MB, Crippa S, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,507 patients: a report from the Pancreatic Anastomotic Leak Study Group. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11(11):1451Y1458; discussion 1459.
14. Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso LW. The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(4):490Y498.
15. Shyr YM, Su CH, Wu CW, et al. Does drainage fluid amylase reflect pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg. 2003;27(5):606Y610.
16. Tani M, Kawai M, Yamaue H. Intraabdominal hemorrhage after a pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2008;15(3):257Y261.
17. Yamaguchi M, Nakano H, Midorikawa T, et al. Prediction of pancreatic fistula by amylase levels of drainage fluid on the first day after pancreatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50(52):1155Y1158.
18. Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg. 2001;234(4):487Y493; discussion 493Y494.
19. Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. The latent presentation of pancreatic fistulas. Br J Surg. 2009;96(6):641Y649.