A grading system can predict clinical and economic outcomes of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Results in 755 consecutive patients

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 396, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 91-98

  Daskalaki, Despoina ^a   Butturini, Giovanni ^a   Molinari, Enrico ^a   Crippa, Stefano ^a   Pederzoli, Paolo ^a   Bassi, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Economic impact; Grading system; ISGPF; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DISEASE; ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT FISTULA; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUODENUM CARCINOMA; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTESTINE FISTULA; LAPAROTOMY; LIVER FAILURE; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; STOMACH DISEASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VATER PAPILLA CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, MUCINOUS; AGED; AMPULLA OF VATER; CARCINOMA, PANCREATIC DUCTAL; COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; DUODENAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 78650943636     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0719-x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. C Bassi G Butturini E Molinari G Mascetta R Salvia M Falconi, et al. 2004 Pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection. The importance of definitions Dig Surg 21 1 54 59 10.1159/000075943 14707394 (Pubitemid 38490179)
2. C Bassi C Dervenis G Butturini A Fingerhut C Yeo J Izbicki, et al. 2005 International study group on pancreatic fistula definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition Surgery 138 1 8 13 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001 16003309 review (Pubitemid 40933766)
3. G Butturini S Marcucci E Molinari G Mascetta L Landoni S Crippa, et al. 2006 Complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the problem of current definitions J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13 3 207 211 10.1007/s00534-005-1035-7 16708296
4. L Ting-Bo B Xue-Li Z Shu-Sen 2007 Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: diagnosed according to the International study group pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) definition Pancreatology 7 325 331 10.1159/000105498 (Pubitemid 47482093)
5. DA Iannitti NG Coburn J Somberg BA Ryder J Monchik WG Cioffi 2003 Use of the round ligament of the liver to decrease pancreatic fistulas: a novel technique J Am Coll Surg 203 6 857 864 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.08.021
6. WB Pratt MP Callery CM Vollmer Jr 2008 Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme World J Surg 32 3 419 428 10.1007/s00268-007-9388-5 18175170
7. C Bassi M Falconi R Salvia G Mascetta E Molinari P Pederzoli 2001 Management of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high volume centre: results on 150 consecutive patients Dig Surg 18 6 453 457 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fnt1Cgug%3D%3D 10.1159/000050193 11799295 discussion 458 (Pubitemid 34088221)
8. E Molinari C Bassi R Salvia G Butturini S Crippa G Talamini, et al. 2007 Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results of a prospective study in 137patients Ann Surg Aug 246 2 281 287 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180caa42f (Pubitemid 47196526)
9. O Bruno G Brancatelli A Sauvenet MP Vullierme V Barrau V Vilgrain 2009 Utility of CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 3 W175 W180 10.2214/AJR.08.1800 19696255
10. SM Strasberg DC Linehan PA Clavien JS Barkun 2007 Proposal for definition and severity grading of pancreatic anastomosis failure and pancreatic occlusion failure Surgery 141 4 420 426 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.001 17383518 (Pubitemid 46441315)
11. M Hashimoto M Koga K Ishiyama J Watarai S Shibata T Sato, et al. 2007 CT features of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 4 W323 W327 10.2214/AJR.05.1174 17376998
12. GV Aranha JM Aaron M Shoup J Pickleman 2006 Current management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy Surgery 140 4 561 368 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.009 17011903 discussion 568-569 (Pubitemid 44442346)
13. RF Payne JA Pain 2006 Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy Br J Surg 93 1 73 77 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnptVajsw%3D%3D 10.1002/bjs.5191 16273533 (Pubitemid 43117308)
14. W Pratt SK Maithel T Vanounou MP Callery CM Vollmer Jr 2006 Postoperative pancreatic fistulas are not equivalent after proximal, distal, and central pancreatectomy J Gastrointest Surg 10 9 1264 1278 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.07.011 17114013 discussion 1278-1279 (Pubitemid 44750743)
15. N Munoz-Bongrand A Sauvanet A Denys A Sibert V Vilgrain J Belghiti 2004 Conservative management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy J Am Coll Surg 199 2 198 203 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004. 03.015 15275873 (Pubitemid 38962730)
16. C Bassi M Falconi E Molinari R Salvia G Butturini N Sartori, et al. 2005 Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study Ann Surg 24 6 767 771 10.1097/01.sla.0000189124.47589.6d discussion 771-773 (Pubitemid 41715244)
17. C Yeo J Cameron M Maher, et al. 1995 A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann Surg 222 580 588 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FisFWhtQ%3D%3D 7574936
18. JW Lin JL Cameron CJ Yeo TS Riall KD Lillemoe 2004 Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula J Gastrointest Surg 8 8 951 959 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044 15585382 (Pubitemid 39600637)
19. F Muscari B Suc S Kirzin JM Hay G Fourtanier A Fingerhut, et al. 2006 French Associations for Surgical Research. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients Surgery 139 5 591 598 10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.012 16701090
20. E Lermite P Pessaux O Brehant C Teyssedou I Pelletier S Etienne, et al. 2007 Risk factors of pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy J Am Coll Surg 204 4 588 596 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.018 17382217 (Pubitemid 46428570)
21. ML DeOliveira JM Winter M Schafer SC Cunningham JL Cameron CJ Yeo, et al. 2006 Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann Surg 244 6 931 937 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a 17122618 discussion 937-939
22. Tsai S, Choti MA, Assumpcao L, Cameron JL, Gleisner AL, Herman JM, Eckhauser F, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Pawlik TM (2010) Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes and survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a large single-institute study. J Gastrointest Surg (epub ahead of print)
23. Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A, Noullet S, Clavel L, Rebours V, Lévy P, Sauvanet A, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery (epub ahead of print)
24. MP Callery WB Pratt CM Vollmer Jr 2009 Prevention and management of pancreatic fistula J Gastrointest Surg 13 1 163 173 10.1007/s11605-008-0534-7 18496727