Comprehensive assessment of aortic compliance and brachial endothelial function using 3.0-T high-resolution MRI: A feasibility study

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 437-442

  Shan, Yan ^a,b   Lin, Jiang ^a,b   Xu, Pengju ^a,b   Zhou, Jianjun ^a,b   Zeng, Mengsu ^a,b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shanghai Medical Imaging Research Institute   (China)

Author keywords

aorta; arterial compliance; endothelial function; magnetic resonance imaging; pulse wave velocity

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY; BLOOD VESSELS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETISM; PLANNING; QUALITY CONTROL; RESONANCE; WAVE PROPAGATION;

AORTA; AORTIC DISTENSIBILITY; AORTIC FLOW; ARTERIAL COMPLIANCE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION; FLOW MEDIATED DILATION; HIGH RESOLUTION; PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY; REPEATED MEASUREMENTS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; AORTA; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTERY DILATATION; ARTERY ENDOTHELIUM; ARTICLE; ASCENDING AORTA; BLOOD VESSEL FUNCTION; BRACHIAL ARTERY; DESCENDING AORTA; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH RESOLUTION NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 84863956349     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825b823e     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Laffon E, Marthan R, Montaudon M, et al. Feasibility of aortic pulse pressure and pressure wave velocity MRI measurement in young adults. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:53-58. (Pubitemid 40041420)
2. Westenberg JJ, de Roos A, Grotenhuis HB, et al. Improved aortic pulse wave velocity assessment from multislice two-directional in-plane velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32:1086-1094.
3. Grotenhuis HB, Westenberg JJ, Steendijk P, et al. Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:521-526.
4. Rose JL, Lalande A, Bouchot O, et al. Influence of age and sex on aortic distensibility assessed by MRI in healthy subjects. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:255-263.
5. Wiesmann F, Petersen SE, Leeson PM, et al. Global impairment of brachial, carotid, and aortic vascular function in young smokers: direct quantification by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2056-2064. (Pubitemid 39473292)
6. Lee JM, Shirodaria C, Jackson CE, et al. Multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging quantifies atherosclerosis and vascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2007; 4:44-48. (Pubitemid 46649073)
7. Markl M, Harloff A, Bley TA, et al. Time-resolved 3D MR velocity mapping at 3T: improved navigator-gated assessment of vascular anatomy and blood flow. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:824-831. (Pubitemid 46516736)
8. Ross R. AtherosclerosisVan inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115-126.
9. Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Zalos G, et al. Prognostic value of coronary vascular endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2002;106:653-658. (Pubitemid 34851922)
10. Gokce N, Keaney JF Jr, Hunter LM, et al. Risk stratification for postoperative cardiovascular events via noninvasive assessment of endothelial function: a prospective study. Circulation. 2002;105: 1567-1572. (Pubitemid 34297634)
11. Glasser SP. On arterial physiology, pathophysiology of vascular compliance, and cardiovascular disease. Heart Dis. 2000;2:375-379.
12. Acevedo-Bolton G, Leung J, Hardy C, et al. Validation of distensibility measurements from MRI-based pulse wave velocity. Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB 2010, Stockholm, Available at: https://www.imt.liu.se/mi-old/ Intern/Onlineproceedings/ISMRM-2010/files/1370-7167.pdf. Accessed May 1-7, 2010.
13. Jacoby DS, Mohler III ER, Rader DJ. Noninvasive atherosclerosis imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6:20-26. Review. (Pubitemid 38898906)
14. van der Meer RW, Diamant M, Westenberg JJ, et al. Magnetic resonance assessment of pulse wave velocity, aortic distensibility, and cardiac function in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9:645-651. (Pubitemid 46956896)
15. Danias PG, Tritos NA, Stuber M, et al. Comparison of aortic elasticity determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in obese versus lean adults. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:195-199. (Pubitemid 36084306)
16. Ibrahim el-SH, Johnson KR, Miller AB, et al. Measuring aortic pulse wave velocity using high-field cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:26.
17. Taviani V, Patterson AJ, Graves MJ, et al. Accuracy and repeatability of Fourier velocity encoded M-mode and two-dimensional cine phase contrast for pulse wave velocity measurement in the descending aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:1185-1194.
18. Markl M, Wallis W, Brendecke S, et al. Estimation of global aortic pulse wave velocity by flow-sensitive 4D MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:1575-1582.
19. Kraft KA, Fatouros PP, Corwin FD, et al. In vitro validation of rapid MR measurement of wave velocity. J Magn Reson. 1997;126:103-109. (Pubitemid 127452113)