Improved aortic pulse wave velocity assessment from multislice two-directional in-plane velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1086-1094

  Westenberg, Jos J M ^a   De Roos, Albert ^a   Grotenhuis, Heynric B ^a   Steendijk, Paul ^a   Hendriksen, Dennis ^a   Van Den Boogaard, Pieter J ^a   Van Der Geest, Rob J ^a   Bax, Jeroen J ^a   Jukema, J Wouter ^a   Reiber, Johan H C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

aorta; blood flow; compliance; MRI; pressure waves; waves

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA PRESSURE; AORTIC PULSE WAVE VELOCITY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; GOLD STANDARD; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART CYCLE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTISLICE MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; RADIOFREQUENCY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REPEAT PROCEDURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEADY STATE FREE PRECESSION;

ADULT; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PULSATILE FLOW; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 78349239704     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22359     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ohmori K, Emura S, Takashima T., Risk factors of atherosclerosis and aortic pulse wave velocity. Angiology 2000; 51: 53-60.
2. Safar ME, Henry O, Meaume S., Aortic pulse wave velocity: an independent marker of cardiovascular risk. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2002; 11: 295-298.
3. Sutton-Tyrrell K, Najjar SS, Boudreau RM, et al. Elevated aortic pulse wave velocity, a marker of arterial stiffness, predicts cardiovascular events in well-functioning older adults. Circulation 2005; 111: 3384-390.
4. Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, etal. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation 2006; 113: 664-670.
5. Mitchell GF, Guo CY, Benjamin EJ, et al. Cross-sectional correlates of increased aortic stiffness in the community: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 115: 2628-2636.
6. Oxlund H, Rasmussen LM, Andreassen TT, Heickendorff L., Increased aortic stiffness in patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 748-752.
7. Cruickshank K, Riste L, Anderson SG, Wright JS, Dunn G, Gosling RG., Aortic pulse-wave velocity and its relationship to mortality in diabetes and glucose intolerance: an integrated index of vascular function?. Circulation 2002; 106: 2085-2090.
8. van Elderen SGC, Brandts A, Westenberg JJM, et al. Aortic stiffness is associated with cardiac function and cerebral small vessel disease in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1132-1138.
9. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 2001; 37: 1236-1241.
10. Safar ME, Levy BI, Struijker-Boudier H., Current perspectives on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure in hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation 2003; 107: 2864-2869.
11. Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension. Stroke 2003; 34: 1203-1206.
12. McEniery CM, Wilkinson IB, Avolio AP., Age, hypertension and arterial function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2007; 34: 665-671.
13. Brandts A, van Elderen SGC, Westenberg JJM, et al. Association of aortic arch pulse wave velocity with left ventricular mass and lacunar brain infarcts in hypertensive patients: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 2009; 253: 681-688.
14. Nollen GJ, Groenink M, Tijssen JP, van der Wall EE, Mulder BJM., Aortic stiffness and diameter predict progressive aortic dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1146-1152.
15. Groenink M, Lohuis TA, Tijssen JG, etal. Survival and complication free survival in Marfan's syndrome: implications of current guidelines. Heart 1999; 82: 499-504.
16. Lehmann ED., Clinical value of aortic pulse-wave velocity measurement. Lancet 1999; 354: 528-529.
17. Lehmann ED., Aortic pulse-wave velocity versus pulse pressure and pulse-wave analysis. Lancet 2000; 355: 412.
18. Tillin T, Chambers J, Malik I, et al. Measurement of pulse wave velocity: site matters. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 383-389.
19. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2588-2605.
20. Boese JM, Bock M, Schoenberg SO, Schad LR., Estimation of aortic compliance using magnetic resonance pulse wave velocity measurement. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45: 1703-1713.
21. Vulliémoz S, Stergiopulos N, Meuli R., Estimation of local aortic elastic properties with MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 649-654.
22. Grotenhuis HB, Westenberg JJM, Steendijk P, et al. Validation and reproducibility of aortic pulse wave velocity as assessed with velocity-encoded MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 521-526.
23. van der Geest RJ, Niezen RA, van der Wall EE, de Roos A, Reiber JHC., Automated measurement of volume flow in the ascending aorta using MR velocity maps: evaluation of inter- and intraobserver variability in healthy volunteers. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 904-911.
24. van der Geest RJ, de Roos A, van der Wall EE, Reiber JHC., Quantitative analysis of cardiovascular MR images. Int J Card Imaging 1997; 13: 247-258.
25. Hamilton CA., Correction of partial volume inaccuracies in quantitative phase contrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12: 1127-1130.
26. Tang C, Blatter DD, Parker DL., Accuracy of phase-contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial-volume effects. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 377-385.
27. Bland JM, Altman DG., Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
28. Rogers WJ, Hu YL, Coast D, et al. Age-associated changes in regional aortic pulse wave velocity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1123-1129.
29. Yu HY, Peng HH, Wang JL, Wen CY, Tseng WY., Quantification of the pulse wave velocity of the descending aorta using axial velocity profiles from phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 876-883.
30. Fielden SW, Fornwalt BK, Jerosch-Herold M, Eisner RL, Stillman AE, Oshinski JN., A new method for the determination of aortic pulse wave velocity using cross-correlation on 2D PCMR velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1382-1387.
31. Gatehouse PD, Rolf MP, Graves MJ, et al. Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010; 12: 5.
32. Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR, Wolff SD., Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 681-685.