Responsible design. A conceptual look at interdependent design-use dynamics

Philosophy and Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 179-198

  Kiran, Asle H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Innovation; Methodology; Responsible design; Technological constitution; Technology; Telecare

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863954769     PISSN: 22105433     EISSN: 22105441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13347-011-0052-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In Bijker & Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-244). Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Albrecthslund, A. (2007). Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(1), 63-72.
3. Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (1992). General introduction. In Bijker & Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 1-14). Cambridge: MIT Press.
4. Boenink, M., Swierstra, T. E., & Stemerding, D. (2010). Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a techno-ethical scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4(2), 1-38.
5. Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Collingridge, D. (1980). The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin's Press.
7. Dubbeld, L. (2004). The regulation of the observing gaze: privacy implications of camera surveillance. Enschede: Ipskamp.
8. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.
9. Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P. H., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design. Theory and methods. University of Washington, CSE Technical Report 02-12-01.
10. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In Heidegger (Ed.), The question concerning technology and other essays (pp. 3-35). New York: Harper & Row.
12. Huis in't Veld, R. M. H. A., Widya, I. A., Bults, R. G. A., Sandsjø, L., Hermens, H. J., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R. (2010). A scenario guideline for designing new teletreatments: a multidisciplinary approach. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(6), 302-307.
13. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Ihde, D. (2008). The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In Vermaas, Kroes, Light, & Moore (Eds.), Philosophy and design. From engineering to architecture (pp. 51-59). Dordrecht: Springer.
16. Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17. Kiran, A. H., & Verbeek, P. P. (2010). Trusting our selves to technology. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 23(3), 409-427.
18. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Bijker & Law (Eds.), Shaping technology-building society. Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225-258). Cambridge, US: MIT Press.
20. Mol, A. (1997). Wat is kiezen? Een empirisch-filosofische verkenning. Inaugural lecture. Universiteit Twente.
21. Mol, A. (2006). Proving or improving: on health care research as a form of self-reflection. Qualitative Health Research, 16(3), 405-414.
22. Oudshoorn, N. (2008). Diagnosis at a distance: the invisible work of patients and healthcare professionals in cardiac telemonitoring technology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(2), 272-288.
23. Oudshoorn, N. (2009). Physical and digital proximity: emerging ways of health care in face-to-face and telemonitoring of heart-failure patients. Sociology of Health & Illness, 31(3), 390-405.
24. Palm, E., & Hansson, S. O. (2006). The case for ethical technology assesment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(5), 543-558.
25. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artefacts. In Bijker, Hughes, & Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems (pp. 19-50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
26. Rip, A. (2009). Futures of ELSA. EMBA Reports, 10(7), 666-670.
27. Schot, J., & Rip, A. (1996). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268.
28. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Stewart, J., & Williams, R. (2005). The wrong trousers? Beyond the design fallacy: social learning and the user. In Rohracher (Ed.), User involvement in innovation processes. Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective (pp. 39-71). München: Profil-Verlag.
30. Swierstra, T. E., Bovenkamp, Hvd, & Trappenburg, M. (2010). Forging a fit between technology and morality: the Dutch debate on organ transplants. Technology in Society, 32(1), 55-64.
31. Taylor, A. S., & Vincent, J. (2005). An SMS history. In Hamill & Lasen (Eds.), Mobile world: past, present and future (pp. 75-91). Dordrecht: Springer.
32. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33. Tromp, N., Hekkert, P., & Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Design for socially responsible behaviour: a classification of influence based on intended user experience. Design Issues, 27(3), 3-19.
34. Verbeek, P. P. (2006a). The morality of things. A postphenomenological inquiry. In Selinger (Ed.), Postphenomenology. A critical companion to Ihde (pp. 117-128). Albany: State University of New York Press.
35. Verbeek, P. P. (2006b). Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 361-380.
36. Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., & Hermens, H. J. (2010). Remote care nearby. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(6), 294-301.
38. Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., Hermens, H. J., Kadefors, R., Dannels, L., Nieuwenhuis, L. J. M., & Hasenbring, M. (2010). Telemedicine services: from idea to implementation. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 16(6), 291-293.
39. Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology. Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
40. Winner, L. (2003). Langdon Winner's testimony to the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives on the societal implications of nanotechnology. http://www.rpi.edu/~winner/testimony.htm. Accessed 16 June 2011.
41. Wynsberghe, Av, & Gastmans, C. (2009). Telepsychiatry and the meaning of in-person contact: a preliminary ethical appraisal. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 12(4), 469-476.
42. Zwart, H., & Nelis, A. (2009). What is ELSA genomics. EMBO Reports, 10(6), 540-544.