Lattice animal model of chromosome organization

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Iyer, Balaji V S ^a   Arya, Gaurav ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLUORESCENT IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LATTICE ANIMALS; LEVELING OFFS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NATURAL CONSEQUENCES; ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; POLYMER MODELS; SHOW THROUGH; SPATIAL DISTANCE;

EXPERIMENTS; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

GENES;

EID: 84863939221     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.011911     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. G. Felsenfeld and M. Groudine, Nature NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature01411 421, 448 (2003). (Pubitemid 36157954)
2. J. Dekker, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1152850 319, 1793 (2008). (Pubitemid 351451557)
3. S. Jhunjhunwala, M. C.van Zelm, M. M. Peak, S. Cutchin, R. Riblet, J. J. M. van Dongen, F. G. Grosveld, T. A. Knoch, and C. Murre, Cell CELLB5 0092-8674 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.024 133, 265 (2008). (Pubitemid 351512300)
4. T. Cremer and C. Cremer, Nat. Rev. Genet. 1471-0056 10.1038/35066075 2, 292 (2001). (Pubitemid 33674777)
5. L. A. Parada and T. Misteli, Trends Cell Biol. TCBIEK 0962-8924 10.1016/S0962-8924(02)02351-6 12, 425 (2002). (Pubitemid 35239951)
6. T. Cremer, M. Cremer, S. Dietzel, S. Müller, I. Solovei, and S. Fakan, Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. COCBE3 0955-0674 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.04.007 18, 307 (2006).
7. R. K. Sachs, G. van den Engh, B. Trask, H. Yokota, and J. E. Hearst, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2710 92, 2710 (1995).
8. J. Mateos-Langerak, M. Bohn, W. de Leeuw, O. Giromus, E. M. M. Manders, P. J. Verschure, M. H. Indemans, H. J. Gierman, D. W. Heermann, and R. van Driel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0809501106 106, 3812 (2009).
9. G. van den Engh, R. K. Sachs, and B. J. Trask, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1388286 257, 1410 (1992).
10. P. Hahnfeldt, J. E. Hearst, D. J. Brenner, R. K. Sachs, and L. R. Hlatky, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7854 90, 7854 (1993).
11. J. Ostashevsky and C. Lange, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. JBSDD6 0739-1102 10.1080/07391102.1994.10508034 11, 813 (1994).
12. C. Münkel and J. Langowski, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.57.5888 57, 5888 (1998).
13. M. Bohn, D. W. Heermann, and R. van Driel, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1539-3755 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.051805 76, 051805 (2007). (Pubitemid 350205871)
14. J. Dekker, K. Rippe, M. Dekker, and N. Kleckner, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1067799 295, 1306 (2002). (Pubitemid 34157624)
15. E. Lieberman-Aiden, N. L. van Berkum, L. Williams, M. Imakaev, T. Ragoczy, A. Telling, I. Amit, B. R. Lajoie, P. J. Sabo, M. O. Dorschner, R. Sandstrom, B. Bernstein, M. A. Bender, M. Groudine, A. Gnirke, J. Stamatoyannopoulos, L. A. Mirny, E. S. Lander, and J. Dekker, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1181369 326, 289 (2009).
16. D. V. Lebedev, M. V. Filatov, A. I. Kuklin, A. K. Islamov, E. Kentzinger, R. Pantina, B. P. Toperverg, and V. V. Isaev-Ivanov, FEBS Lett. FEBLAL 0014-5793 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.052 579, 1465 (2005). (Pubitemid 40289197)
17. A. Bancaud, S. Huet, N. Daigle, J. Mozziconacci, and J. Ellenberg, EMBO J. EMJODG 0261-4189 10.1038/emboj.2009.340 28, 3785 (2009).
18. M. Bohn, and D. W. Heermann, PLoS ONE 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone. 0012218 5, e12218 (2010).
19. A. Rosa, N. B. Becker, and R. Everaers, Biophys. J. BIOJAU 0006-3495 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.054 98, 2410 (2010).
20. A. Rosa and R. Everaers, PLOS Comput. Biol. 1553-734X 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000153 4, e1000153 (2008).
21. M. Bohn and D. W. Heermann, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.3302812 132, 044904 (2010).
22. B. V. S. Iyer, M. Kenward, and G. Arya, BMC Biophys. 2046-1682 10.1186/2046-1682-4-8 4, 8 (2011).
23. A. M. Gutin, A. Y. Grosberg, and E. I. Shakhnovich, Macromolecules MAMOBX 0024-9297 10.1021/ma00058a016 26, 1293 (1993).
24. A. Grosberg, Y. Rabin, S. Havlin, and A. Neer, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/0295-5075/23/5/012 23, 373 (1993).
25. P. R. Cook and D. Marenduzzo, J. Cell. Biol. JCLBA3 0021-9525 10.1083/jcb.200903083 186, 825 (2009).
26. A. R. Khokhlov and S. K. Nechaev, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(85)90678-4 112, 156 (1985).
27. Typically, each node is considered in turn as the origin for the computation of the largest generation number of a LA. However, since the distribution of nodes with reference to any node should be equivalent for an exhaustively sampled structure, we find it sufficient to fix one node permanently as the origin node. Our choice of keeping the origin node fixed facilitates rapid computation of the maximum generation numbers while still yielding the correct ensemble of structures.
28. T. C. Lubensky and J. Isaacson, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.20.2130 20, 2130 (1979).
29. G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.871 46, 871 (1981).
30. M. Rubinstein and R. H. Colby, Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
31. T. Misteli, Cell CELLB5 0092-8674 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.028 128, 787 (2007). (Pubitemid 46273571)
32. P. R. Cook, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.284.5421.1790 284, 1790 (1999). (Pubitemid 29291422)
33. J. S. Lucas, C. Bossen, and C. Murre, Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 0955-0674 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.11.007 23, 318 (2011).