Simultaneous analysis of multiple data types in pharmacogenomic studies using weighted sparse canonical correlation analysis

OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 7-8, 2012, Pages 363-373

  Chalise, Prabhakar ^a   Batzler, Anthony ^b   Abo, Ryan ^b   Wang, Liewei ^b   Fridley, Brooke L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPOIETIN 2; ARL2BP PROTEIN; CENTROMERE PROTEIN B; CLDN23 PROTEIN; ERS2 PROTEIN; FKBP5 PROTEIN; GCAT PROTEIN; GEMCITABINE; HLA DR ANTIGEN; INPP5F PROTEIN; LAIR1 PROTEIN; LAMA3 PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; METHYLATED DNA PROTEIN CYSTEINE METHYLTRANSFERASE; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE 10; NIPSNAP3A PROTEIN; NIPSNAP3B PROTEIN; NPM1P3 PROTEIN; PIGB PROTEIN; PIK3R1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN PATCHED 1; PSME3 PROTEIN; RAB27A PROTEIN; RCBTB2 PROTEIN; REPS2 PROTEIN; RNF26 PROTEIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VARS PROTEIN; VAV3 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG CYTOTOXICITY; DRUG RESPONSE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PHARMACOGENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPARSE CANONICAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIMETABOLITES, ANTINEOPLASTIC; CELL LINE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEOXYCYTIDINE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION 50; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84863902530     PISSN: 15362310     EISSN: 15578100     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2011.0126     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bolstad, B.M., Irizarry, R.A., Astrand, M., and Speed, T.P. (2003). A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias. Bioinformatics 19, 185-193.
2. Fridley, B.L., Jenkins, G., Schaid, D.J., and Wang, L. (2009). A Bayesian hierarchical nonlinear model for assessing the association between genetic variation and drug cytotoxicity. Statistics Med 28, 2709-2722.
3. Gallant, A.R. (1987). Nonlinear Statistical Models. New York: WILEY.
4. Gauderman, W.J., Murcray, C., Gilliland, F., and Conti, D.V. (2007). Testing association between disease and multiple SNPs in a candidate gene. Genet Epidemiol 31, 383-395.
5. Hauser, M.A., Li, Y.J., Takeuchi, S., et al. (2003). Genomic convergence: Identifying candidate genes for Parkinson's disease by combining serial analysis of gene expression and genetic linkage. Hum Molec Genet 12, 671-677.
6. Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika Trust 38, 321-377.
7. Huang, R.S., Duan, S., Kistner, E.O., et al. (2008). Genetic variants contributing to daunorubicin-induced cytotoxicity. Cancer Res 68, 3161-3168.
8. Leurgans, S.E., Moyeed, R.A., and Silverman, B.W. (1993). Canonical correlation analysis when the data are curves. J Royal Statistical Soc Series B 55, 725-740.
9. Li, L., Fridley, B., Kalari, K., et al. (2008). Gemcitabine and cytosine arabinoside cytotoxicity: ASSOCIATION with lymphoblastoid cell expression. Cancer Res 68, 7050-7058.
10. Li, L., Fridley, B.L., Kalari, K., et al. (2009). Gemcitabine and arabinosylcytosin pharmacogenomics: Genome-wide association and drug response biomarkers. PLoS One 4, e7765.
11. Lykou, A., and Whittaker, J. (2010). Sparse CCA using a lasso with positivity constraints. Computational Statistics Data Analysis 54, 3144-3157.
12. Niu, N., Qin, Y., Fridley, B.L., et al. (2010). Radiation pharmacogenomics: A genome-wide association approach to identify radiation response biomarkers using human lymphoblastoid cell lines. Genome Res 20,1482-1492.
13. Parkhomenko, E., Tritchler, D., and Beyene, J. (2009). Sparse canonical correlation analysis with application to genomic data integration. Statistical Appl Genet Molec Biol 8, Article 1.
14. Price, A.L., Patterson, N.J., Plenge, R.M., Weinblatt, M.E., Shadick, N.A., and Reich, D. (2006). Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genet 38, 904-909.
15. Rinaldo, A., Bacanu, S.A., Devlin, B., Sonpar, V., Wasserman, L., and Roeder, K. (2005). Characterization of multilocus linkage disequilibrium. Genet Epidemiol 28, 193-206.
16. Schadt, E.E., Lamb, J., Yang, X., et al. (2005). An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nature Genet 37, 710-717.
17. Scheet, P., and Stephens, M. (2006). A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: APPLICATIONS to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am J Hum Genet 78, 629-644.
18. Via, J., Santamaria, I., and Perez, J. (2007). A learning algorithm for adaptive canonical correlation analysis of several data sets. Neural Networks 20, 139-152.
19. Waaijenborg, S., Verselewel De Witt Hamer, P.C., and Zwinderman, A.H. (2008). Quantifying the association between gene expressions and DNA-markers by penalized canonical correlation analysis. Statistical Appl Genetics Molec Biol 7, Article 3.
20. Witten, D.M., and Tibshirani, R.J. (2009). Extensions of sparse canonical correlation analysis with applications to genomic data. Statistical Appl Genetics Molec Biol 8, Article 28.
21. Wu, Z., Irizarry, R, Gentleman, R., Martinez-Murillo, F., and Spencer, F. (2004). A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. J Am Statistical Assn 99, 909-917.
22. Zhou, J., and He, X. (2008). Dimension reduction based on constrained canonical correlation and variable filtering. Ann Statistics 36, 1649-1668.