Children's Use of Analogy During Collaborative Reasoning

Child Development

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1429-1443

  Lin, Tzu Jung ^a   Anderson, Richard C ^a   Hummel, John E ^a   Jadallah, May ^b   Miller, Brian W ^a   Nguyen Jahiel, Kim ^a   Morris, Joshua A ^a   Kuo, Li Jen ^c   Kim, Il Hee ^d   Wu, Xiaoying ^a   Dong, Ting ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY PURDUE UNIVERSITY FORT WAYNE   (United States)

^e UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; COOPERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPEECH;

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPEECH;

EID: 84863882358     PISSN: 00093920     EISSN: 14678624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01784.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Chang, J., Waggoner, M., & Yi, H. (1997). On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 135-167.
2. Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M., & Nguyen, K. (1998). Intellectually stimulating story deiscussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170-186). New York: Guilford.
3. Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S.-Y., Reznitskaya, A., et al. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1-46.
4. Azmitia, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59, 87-96.
5. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307-359.
7. Bassok, M. (1996). Using content to interpret structure: Effects on analogical transfer. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 54-58.
8. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 378-411.
10. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism: Protocol evidence on sources of creativity in science. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research (pp. 341-381). New York: Plenum.
11. Crone, E. A., Wendelken, C., van Leijenhorst, L., Honomichl, R. D., Christoff, K., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Neurocognitive development of relational reasoning. Developmental Science, 21, 55-66.
12. Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I.-H., & Li, Y. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 400-424.
13. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Conceptual structures and processes: Emergence, discovery, and change (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Ellis, S. (1997). Strategy choice in sociocultural context. Developmental Review, 17, 490-524.
15. Gauvain, M. (2001). The social context of cognitive development. New York: Guilford.
16. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.
17. Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspective on thought and language: Interrelations in development (pp. 225-277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.
19. Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Science, 15, 1-38.
20. Glynn, S. M., & Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1129-1149.
21. Göncü, A., & Gauvain, M. (2012). Sociocultural approaches to educational psychology: Theory, research, and application. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 123-152). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Goswami, U. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory. Child Development, 62, 1-22.
23. Goswami, U. (2008). The development of reading across languages. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 1-12.
24. Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory and Cognition, 15, 332-340.
25. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
26. Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Miller, M., Kim, I.-H., Kuo, L.-J., et al. (2011). Influence of a teacher's scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 194-230.
27. Kim, I.-H., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Archodidou, A. (2007). Discourse patterns during children's collaborative online discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 333-370.
28. Kotovsky, K., & Gentner, D. (1996). Comparison and categorization in the development of relational similarity. Child Development, 67, 2797-2822.
29. Kumar, S., & Miller, K. F. (2005). Let SMIL be your umbrella: Software tools for transcribing, coding, and presenting digital video in behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 359-367.
30. Leman, P. J., & Oldham, Z. (2005). Do children need to learn to collaborate?: The effect of age and age differences on collaborative recall. Child Development, 20, 33-48.
31. Liang, K.-Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
32. May, D. B., Hammer, D., & Roy, P. (2006). Children's analogical reasoning in a third-grade science discussion. Science Education, 90, 316-330.
33. Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95-111.
34. Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135-198.
35. Prentice, R. L., Williams, B. J., & Peterson, A. V. (1981). On the regression analysis of multivariate failure time data. Biometrika, 68, 373-379.
36. QSR. (2002). QSR NUD*IST 6 [Computer software]. Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research.
37. Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task. Cognitive Development, 13, 453-478.
38. Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., Dong, T., Li, Y., Kim, I.-H., & Kim, S.-Y. (2008). Learning to think well: Application of Argument Schema Theory. In C. C. Block & S. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 196-213). New York: Guilford.
39. Reznitskaya, A., & Clark, A. (2001). A trip to the zoo. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
40. Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy generation in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 37-60.
41. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273.
42. Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606-620.
43. Smith, L. B. (1984). Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. Child Development, 55, 363-380.
44. Taylor, M. D. (1998). The gold Cadillac. New York: Penguin Putnam.
45. Teasley, S. D. (1995). The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. Developmental Psychology, 31, 207-220.
46. Thagard, P., & Shelley, C. P. (2001). Emotional analogies and analogical inference. In D. Gentner, K. H. Holyoak, & B. K. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 335-362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Trickett, S. B., & Trafton, J. G. (2007). "What if...": The use of conceptual simulations in scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 31, 843-875.
48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. London: Harvard University Press.
49. Weiner, E. H. (1980). What should Kelly do? Washington, DC: National Education Association.
50. Weisstein, E. W. (n.d.) Gamma distribution. MathWorld. Retrieved from.
51. Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 59-79.