Eye movements during object recognition in visual agnosia

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2142-2153

  Charles Leek, E ^a   Patterson, Candy ^a   Paul, Matthew A ^b   Rafal, Robert ^a   Cristino, Filipe ^a  

^a BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGNOSIA; ARTICLE; BRAIN ARTERY; CASE REPORT; CEREBRAL BLINDNESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFUSION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OBJECT RELATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION; VISUAL AGNOSIA;

AGED; AGNOSIA; EYE MOVEMENTS; FACE; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INTELLIGENCE TESTS; LANGUAGE TESTS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROSOPAGNOSIA; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SACCADES; SEMANTICS; STROKE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84863880571     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barton J.J.S., Radcliffe N., Cherkasova M., Edelman J.A. Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 181:199-211.
2. Behrmann M., Williams P. Impairments in part-whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:701-730.
3. Benson D.F., Greenberg J.P. Visual form agnosia: a specific defect in visual discrimination. Archives of Neurology 1969, 20:82-89.
4. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 1987, 94(2):115-147.
5. Chen X., Zelinsky G.J. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research 2006, 46:4118-4133.
6. Cowey A., Alexander I., Heywood C., Kentridge R. Pupillary responses to coloured and contourless displays in total cerebral achromatopsia. Brain 2008, 131:2153-2160.
7. Crawford J.R., Howell D.C. Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 1998, 12:482-486.
8. De Renzi E., Lucchelli F. The fuzzy boundaries of apperceptive agnosia. Cortex 1993, 29:187-215.
9. Findlay J.M., Walker R. A model of saccadic generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 1999, 22(4):661-721.
10. Foulsham T., Barton J.J.S., Kingstone A., Dewhurst R., Underwood G. Fixation and saliency during search of natural scenes: the case of visual agnosia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1994-2003.
11. Foulsham T., Barton J.J.S., Kingstone A., Dewhurst R., Underwood G. Modeling eye movements in visual agnosia with a saliency map approach: bottom-up guidance or top-down strategy?. Neural Networks 2011, 10.1016/j.neunet.2011.01.004.
12. Foulsham T., Kingstone A. Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Vision Research 2010, 50(8):779-795.
13. Foulsham T., Underwood G. What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision 2008, 8:1-17.
14. Grailet J.M., Seron X., Bruyer R., Coyette F., Frederix M. Case report of a visual integrative agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990, 7:275-309.
15. Henderson J.M., Brockmole J.R., Castelhano M.S., Mack M.L. Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain 2007, Elsevier, Amsterdam. R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, R.W. Hill (Eds.).
16. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. To See But not Too See: A Case Study of Visual Agnosia 1987, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, UK.
17. Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. Features, objects, action: the cognitive neuropsychology of visual object processing, 1984-2004. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:156-183.
18. Itti L., Koch C., Niebur E. A model of saliency-based visual attention scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1998, 20(11):1254-1259.
19. Johnston S.J., Leek E.C. Fixation region overlap: a quantitative method for the analysis of fixational eye movement patterns. Journal of Eye Movement Research 2009, 1(3):1-12. 5.
20. Le S., Raufaste E., Roussel S., Démonet J. Processing of normal, inverted, and scrambled faces in a patient with prosopagnosia: behavioural and eye tracking data. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17:26-35.
21. Le S., Raufaste E., Roussel S., Puel M., Démonet J. Implicit face perception in a patient with visual agnosia? Evidence from behavioural and eye-tracking analyses. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:702-712.
22. Leek E.C., Cristino F., Conlan L.I., Patterson C., Rodriguez E., Johnston S.J. Eye movement patterns during the recognition of three-dimensional objects: preferential fixation of concave surface curvature minima. Journal of Vision 2012, 12(1):7. 10.1167/12.1.7.
23. Leek E.C., Rapp B.C., Turnbull O.H. The analysis of drawing from memory performance in brain-damaged patients. Brain and Cognition 2000, 43:310-315.
24. Mannan S.K., Kennard C., Hussain M. The role of visual salience in directing eye movements in visual object agnosia. Current Biology 2009, 19:R247-R248.
25. Mannan S., Ruddock K., Wooding D. The relationship between the locations of spatial features and those of fixations made during visual examination of briefly presented images. Spatial Vision 1996, 10:165-188.
26. Melcher D., Kowler E. Shapes, surfaces and saccades. Vision Research 1999, 39:2929-2946.
27. Orban de Xivry J.-J., Ramon M., Lefèvre P., Rossion B. Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology 2008, 2:245-268.
28. Parkhurst D., Law K., Niebur E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research 2002, 42:107-123.
29. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W. Birmingham Object Recognition Battery 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove, East Sussex.
30. Ska B., Ginette Martin, Nespoulous J.-L. Body image and normal aging: Graphic and verbal representation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 1988, 20(2):121-132.
31. Stephan B.C., Caine D. Aberrant pattern of scanning in prosopagnosia reflects impaired face processing. Brain and Cognition 2009, 69:262-268.
32. Tarr M.J., Yu S. Object Databank [CD-ROM]. Version 1.0 1996, Providence (RI): Brown University.
33. van Belle G., De Graef P., Verfaillie K., Busigny T., Rossion B. Whole not hole: expert face recognition requires holistic perception. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:2620-2629.
34. Walker-Renninger L., Verghese P., Coughlan J. Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(3):1-17. 6.
35. Walther D., Koch C. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks 2006, 19:1395-1407.
36. Warrington E.K., Taylor A.M. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex 1973, 9:152-164.
37. Yarbus A.L. Eye Movements and Vision 1967, Plenum Press, New York.