Predictors of differences in the perception of antimicrobial resistance risk in the treatment of sick, at-risk, and high-risk feedlot cattle

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 24-33

  Jan, Jie Sheng ^a   McIntosh, Wm Alex ^a   Dean, Wesley ^b   Scott, H Morgan ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antimicrobial resistance; Efficacy; Feedlot cattle; Perceived risk; Veterinarians

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; CHRONIC DISEASE; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; VETERINARIANS;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS;

EID: 84863880103     PISSN: 01675877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ajzen I., Fishbein M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior 1980, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle Creek.
2. Andreason C.B., Spickler A.R., Jones B.E. Swedish antimicrobial regulations and their impact on food animal production. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2005, 227:41-45.
3. Barton M.D. Does the use of antibiotics in animals affect human health?. Aust.Vet. J. 1998, 76:177-180.
4. Boyle G.J. Does item homogeneity indicate internal consistency or item redundancy in psychometric scales?. Pers. Individual Differences 1991, 12:291-294.
5. Burbee C.R., Green R., Matsumoto M. Antibiotics in animal feeds: risks and costs. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1985, 67:966-970.
6. Cameron L.D., Reeve J. Risk perceptions, worry, and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility. Psychol. Health 2006, 21:211-230.
7. Curtis K.R., Moeltner K. Genetically modified food market participation and consumer risk perceptions: a cross-country comparison. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 54:289-310.
8. Dean W.R., Scott H.M., McIntosh W.A., Barling K.S. The role of trust and moral duty in beef cattle feedlot veterinarians' adoption of antibiotic metaphylaxis recommendations. Int. J. Sociol. Agric. Food 2011, 18:104-120.
9. Dean W.R., Takei I., McIntosh W.A., Scott H.M., Barling K.S. Predicting antibiotic behavior of beef feedlot operators. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society 2005.
10. De Vet E., de Nooijer J., Oenema A., de Vries N.K., Brug J. Predictors of stage transition in the precaution adoption process model. Am. J. Health Promot. 2008, 22:282-290.
11. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys 2000, New York, John Wiley & Sons. second ed.
12. Doherty N., Schlesinger H. Severity risk and the adverse selection of frequency risk. J. Risk Insurance 1995, 62:649-665.
13. Epstein J.A., Griffin K.W. A social influence model of alcohol use for inner-city adolescents: family drinking, perceived drinking norms, and perceived social benefits of drinking. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 2008, 69:388-405.
14. Finucane M.L., Hollup J.L. Risk as value: combining affect and analysis in risk judgments. J. Risk Res. 2006, 9:141-164.
15. Gorbach S.L. Antimicrobial use in animal feed-time to stop. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345:1202-1203.
16. Grobe D., Douthitt R., Zepeda L. A model of consumers' risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH): the impact of risk characteristics. Risk Anal. 1999, 19:661-673.
17. Gustafson R.H., Bowen R.E. Antibiotic use in animal agriculture (review). J. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 83:531-541.
18. Harrison P.E., Lederberg J. Antimicrobial Resistance: Issue and Options. Workshop Report 1988, National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
19. Jan J.-S., McIntosh W.A., Scott H.M., Dean W. The effects of moral obligations to others and others' influence on veterinarians' attitudes toward and recommendations to utilize antibiotics in feedlot cattle. J. Rural Social Sci. 2010, 25:122-142.
20. Johnson B.B. Varying risk comparison elements: effects on public reactions. Risk Anal. 2004, 24:103-114.
21. Johnson B.B. Risk comparisons, conflict, and risk acceptability claims. Risk Anal. 2004, 24:131-145.
22. Krewski D., Lemyre L., Turner M., Lee J.E.C., Dallaire C., Bouchard L., Brand K., Mercier P. Public perceptions of population health risks in Canada: risk perception beliefs. Health Risk Soc. 2008, 10:167-179.
23. Manstead A.S.R. The role of moral norm in the attitude-behavior relation. Attitude, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership 2000, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. D. Terry, M. Hogg (Eds.).
24. McIntosh W.A., Dean W.R., Schulz S., Scott H.M., Takei I. Predicting feedlot veterinarian recommendations to treat cattle with antimicrobials under four conditions. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society 2005.
25. McIntosh W.A., Schulz S., Dean W.R., Scott H.M., Barling K.S., Takei I. Feedlot veterinarians' moral norms, instrumental beliefs, and attitudes regarding antimicrobial use under four situations. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 19:51-67.
26. Miller P.G. Scapegoating, self-confidence, and risk comparison: the functionality of risk neutralization and lay epidemiology by injecting drug users. Int. J. Drug Policy 2005, 16:246-253.
27. National Academy of Sciences The Use of Drugs in Food Animals: Benefits and Risks 1999, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
28. Nordenberg, T., 1999. Miracle Drugs vs. Superbugs: Preserving the Usefulness of Antibiotics. FDA Consumer Magazine. November-December.
29. Priest S.H., Bonfadelli H., Rusanen M. The trust gap hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Anal. 2003, 23:751-767.
30. Rollin B. Ethics, science, and antimicrobial resistance. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2001, 14:29-37.
31. Rollin B. Ethical question of the month. Can. Vet. J. 2007, 48:1222.
32. Singer R.S., Cox L.A., Dickson J.S., Hurd H.S., Phillips I., Miller G.Y. Modeling the relationship between food animal health and human foodborne illness. Prev. Vet. Med. 2007, 79:186-203.
33. Sparks P., Shepard R., Frewer L. Assessing and structuring attitudes towards the use of gene technology in food production: the role of perceived ethical obligation. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 16:267-285.
34. Spence A., Towsend E. Examining consumer behavior toward genetically modified (GM) food in Britain. Risk Anal. 2006, 26:657-670.
35. Taylor-Goody P., Zinn J.O. Current directions in risk research: new developments in psychology and sociology. Risk Anal. 2006, 26:397-411.
36. United States Department of Agriculture. 2000. Part III: Health Management and Biosecurity in U.S. Feedlots, 1999. USDA: APHIS:VS, CEAH, National Animal Health Monitoring System. Fort Collins, CO. #N336.1200.
37. Vandermoere F. Hazard perception, risk perception, and the need for decontamination by residents exposed to soil pollution: the role of sustainability and the limits of expert knowledge. Risk Anal. 2008, 28:387-398.
38. Wang R.-H., Cheng C.-P., Chou F.-H. A causal model of contraceptive intention and its gender comparison among Taiwanese sexually inexperienced adolescents. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008, 17:930-939.
39. Wassenaar T.M. Use of antimicrobial agents in veterinary medicine and implications for human health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 31:155-169.
40. Williams P.R.D. Health risk communication using comparative risk analyses. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2004, 14:498-515.
41. World Health Organization, 2001. WHO global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. WHO/CDS/CSR/DRS/2001.2a.