Evaluation of risk factors and effect of physical activity in caesarean section in nulliparous women

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1456-1459

  Karabulut, Aysun ^a   Derbent, Aysel Uysal ^b   Yildirim, Melahat ^b   Simavli, Serap ^b   Turhan, Nilgün Öztürk ^b  

^a DENIZLI STATE HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b FATIH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Caesarean section; cervical dilatation; labour; modified Grimby score; physical activity; pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FETUS; FETUS DISTRESS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; LABOR INDUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NULLIPARA; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATERNAL AGE; PATIENT CODING; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION; WEIGHT GAIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BODY HEIGHT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARITY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; WEIGHT GAIN; WOMEN, WORKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863877039     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2011.640370     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Turkish National Health Statistics 2009. Available at: www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/belge/1-11615/saglik-istatistikleri-yilligi-2009.html
2. Porreco RP, Thorp JA. The cesarean birth epidemic: Trends, causes, and solutions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:369-374. (Pubitemid 26390994)
3. Churchill H, Savage W, Francome C. Caesarean birth in Britain. 2nd ed. Middlesex University Press, Cambridge, UK; 2006.
4. Baldwin LM, Hart LG, Lloyd M, Fordyce M, Rosenblatt RA. Defensive medicine and obstetrics. JAMA 1995;274:1606-1610.
5. Häger RM, Daltveit AK, Hofoss D, Nilsen ST, Kolaas T, Øian P, Henriksen T. Complications of cesarean deliveries: Rates and risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:428-434. (Pubitemid 38249240)
6. Bergholt T, Stenderup JK, Vedsted-Jakobsen A, Helm P, Lenstrup C. Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: An observational study of the incidence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:251-256. (Pubitemid 36459733)
7. van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;74:1-6. (Pubitemid 27272171)
8. Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:21-26. (Pubitemid 44336840)
9. Ryding EL, Wijma K, Wijma B. Experiences of emergency cesarean section: A phenomenological study of 53 women. Birth 1998;25:246-251. (Pubitemid 128348669)
10. Salim R, Shalev E. Health implications resulting from the timing of elective cesarean delivery. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;8:68.
11. Lilford RJ, van Coeverden de Groot HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: A detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing physiological disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:883-892. (Pubitemid 20340619)
12. Yoles I, Maschiach S. Increased maternal mortality in cesarean delivery as compared to vaginal delivery? Time for re-evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:s78.
13. Grimby G. Physical activity and muscle training in the elderly. Acta Med Scand Suppl 1986;711:233-237. (Pubitemid 16008744)
14. Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:35-42.
15. Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:698-704. (Pubitemid 40432184)
16. Bailit JL, Dierker L, Blanchard MH, Mercer BM. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:77-79. (Pubitemid 40189914)
17. Impey L, Hobson J, O'herlihy C. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: Prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:438-443. (Pubitemid 30651094)
18. Gawade P, Pekow P, Markenson G, Plevyak M, Goh W, Chasan-Taber L. Physical activity before and during pregnancy and duration of second stage of labor among Hispanic women. J Reprod Med 2009;54:429-435.