Plant-microbe interactions: Novel applications for exploitation in multipurpose remediation technologies

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 416-420

  Abhilash, P C ^a   Powell, Jeff R ^b   Singh, Harikesh B ^a   Singh, Brajesh K ^b  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b WESTERN SYDNEY UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTRACTIVE STRATEGIES; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL APPROACHES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHEMICAL INTERACTIONS; CONTAMINATED LANDS; ECONOMIC BENEFITS; ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; NOVEL APPLICATIONS; PHYTOREMEDIATION; PLANT TISSUES; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; SOIL REMEDIATION; TRANSGENICS; WORLD POPULATION;

BIOREMEDIATION; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOILS; TISSUE;

MICROORGANISMS;

ARSENIC; ATRAZINE; BIOFUEL; BIOPOLYMER; CADMIUM; CHLORPYRIFOS; COPPER; EMULSIFYING AGENT; EXPLOSIVE; GLUTAMATE CYSTEINE LIGASE; GROUND WATER; HEAVY METAL; HERBICIDE; HYDROCARBON; LINDANE; MERCURY; METAL NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; ORGANIC COMPOUND; PERFLUORO COMPOUND; PESTICIDE; SELENIUM; SURFACTANT;

AIR POLLUTION; BACTERIUM; BIOENERGY; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLING; BIOMASS; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CATABOLISM; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENDOPHYTE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FUNGUS; GENOMICS; METABOLOMICS; METAGENOMICS; METAL EXTRACTION; MICROBIAL GENETICS; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYTOREMEDIATION; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT ROOT; PLANT TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; PYROLYSIS; REVIEW; RHIZOSPHERIC MICROORGANISM; SOIL POLLUTANT; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL; SOIL QUALITY; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; TRANSGENIC PLANT; TRANSGENICS; WATER CYCLE; WATER QUALITY;

BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; METALS, HEAVY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PLANT ROOTS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; SOIL POLLUTANTS; SYMBIOSIS;

HARNESS;

EID: 84863865605     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.004     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Hodson M.E. The need for sustainable soil remediation. Elements 2010, 6:363-368.
2. Banwart S. Save our soils. Nature 2011, 474:151-152.
3. Huttermann A., et al. Application of superabsorbent polymers for improving the ecological chemistry of degraded or polluted lands. Clean Soil Air Water 2009, 37:517-526.
4. Ma Y., et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29:248-258.
5. Santillo D., Johnston P. Playing with fire. The global threat presented by brominated flame retardants justifies urgent substitution. Environ. Int. 2003, 29:725-734.
6. Gouin T., Wania F. Time trends of Arctic contamination in relation to emission history and chemical persistence and partitioning properties. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:5986-5992.
7. Godfray H.C., et al. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327:812-818.
8. Singh B.K. Organophosphorous degrading bacteria: ecology and industrial applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:156-164.
9. Abhilash P.C., et al. Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27:474-488.
10. Singh B.K. Unravelling rhizosphere-microbe interactions: opportunities and limitations. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12:386-393.
11. Weyens N., et al. Exploiting plant-microbe partnerships to improve biomass production and remediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27:591-598.
12. Paul E. Soil Microbiology, Ecology, and Biochemistry 2007, Academic Press. 3rd edn.
13. Badri D.V., et al. Rhizosphere chemical dialogues: plant-microbial interactions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:642-650.
14. Markmann K., Parniske M. Evolution root endosymbiosis with bacteria: how novel are nodules?. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:77-86.
15. Crowley D.E., Kraemer S.M. Function of siderophores in the plant rhizoshpere. The Rhizopshere, Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface 2007, 73-109. CRC Press. R. Pinton (Ed.).
16. Tanimoto E. Regulation of root growth by plant hormones - roles for auxin and gibberellins. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 2005, 24:249-265.
17. Abhilash P.C., Yunus M. Can we use biomass produced from phytoremediation?. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:1371-1372.
18. Maestri E., Marmiroli M. Genetic and molecular aspects of metal tolerance and hyperaccumualtion. Metal Toxicity in Plants: Perception, Signalling and Remediation 2011, 41-61. Springer. D.K. Gupta, L.M. Sandalio (Eds.).
19. Ruis O.N., Daniell H. Genetic engineering to enhance mercury phytoremediation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20:213-219.
20. Dhankher O.P., et al. Biotechnological approaches for phytoremediation. Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture 2012, 309-328. Academic Press. A. Arie Altman, P.M. Hasegawa (Eds.).
21. Iimura Y., et al. Hybrid aspen with a transgene for fungal manganese peroxidase is a potential contributor to phytoremediation of the environment contaminated with bisphenol A. J Wood Sci. 2007, 53:541-544.
22. Che D., et al. Expression of mercuric ion reductase in Eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) confers mercuric ion reduction and resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2003, 1:311-319.
23. Bittsanszkya A., et al. Ability of transgenic poplars with elevated glutathione content to tolerate zinc(2+) stress. Environ. Int. 2005, 31:251-254.
24. Van Dillewijn P., et al. Bioremediation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by bacterial nitroreductase expressing transgenic aspen. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:7405-7410.
25. Doty S.L., et al. Enhanced metabolism of halogenated hydrocarbons in transgenic plants contain mammalian P450 2E1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 97:6287-6291.
26. Gullner G., et al. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic poplar plants overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase towards chloroacetanilide herbicides. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52:971-979.
27. Van Aken, B. et al. (2011) Endophyte-assisted phytoremediation of explosives in Poplar trees by Methylobacterium populi BJ001T. In Endophytes of Forest Trees: Biology and Applications (Forestry Sciences, Vol. 80) (Pirttila, A.M. and Frank, A.C., eds), pp. 217-234, Springer.
28. Singh B.K. Emerging and genomic approaches in bioremediation. Proceedings of the 4th International Contaminated Site Remediation Conference 2011, 75-76. CRC CARE.
29. Juwarkar A.A., et al. A comprehensive overview of elements in bioremediation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 9:215-288.
30. Lehman J., et al. Biochar effects on soil biota: a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43:1812-1836.
31. Zhang W.X. Nanoscale iron particles for environmental remediation: an overview. J. Nanopart. Res. 2003, 5:323-332.
32. Ghormade V., et al. Perspectives for nano-biotechnology enabled protection and nutrition of plants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29:792-803.
33. Paknikar K.M., et al. Degradation of lindane from aqueous solutions using iron sulfide nanoparticles stabilized by biopolymers. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2005, 6:370-374.
34. Ma X., Wang C. Fullerene nanoparticle affect the fate and uptake of trichloroethylene in phytoremediation systems. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2010, 27:989-992.
35. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:7315-7320.
36. 2 nanoparticles and assessment of their differential toxicity in four edible plant species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58:3689-3693.
37. Singh B.K. Exploring microbial diversity for biotechnology: the way forward. Trend Biotechnol. 2010, 28:111-116.
38. Pulford I.D., Watson C. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by Trees - a review. Environ. Int. 2003, 29:529-540.
39. Volk T.A., et al. The development of short-rotation willow in the northeastern United States for bioenergy and bioproducts, agroforestry and phytoremediation. Biomass Bioener. 2006, 30:715-727.
40. Ruttens A., et al. Short rotation coppice culture of willows and poplars as energy crops on metal contaminated agricultural soils. Int. J. Phytorem. 2011, 13:194-207.
41. Fang C., et al. Atrazine and phenanthrene degradation in grass rhizosphere soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33:671-678.
42. Jamil S., et al. Jatropha curcas: a potential crop for phytoremediation of coal fly ash. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 172:269-275.
43. Meers E., et al. The use of bio-energy crops (Zea mays) for 'phytoattenuation' of heavy metals on moderately contaminated soils: a field experiment. Chemosphere 2010, 78:35-41.
44. Técher D., et al. Contribution of Miscanthus × giganteus root exudates to the biostimulation of PAH degradation: an in vitro study. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:4489-4495.
45. Huang H., et al. The phytoremediation potential of bioenergy crop Ricinus communis for DDTs and cadmium co-contaminated soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:11034-11038.