Asymmetric degeneration of paravertebral muscles in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Spine

Volumn 37, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 1398-1406

  Shafaq, Najibullah ^a   Suzuki, Akinobu ^a   Matsumura, Akira ^b   Terai, Hidetomi ^a   Toyoda, Hiromitsu ^a   Yasuda, Hiroyuki ^a   Ibrahim, Mohammad ^a   Nakamura, Hiroaki ^a  

^a OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Osaka City Juso Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

crosssectional area; degenerative lumbar scoliosis; fat infi ltration; lumbar spinal stenosis paravertebral muscles; muscle atrophy; muscle degeneration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SCOLIOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIFIDUS MUSCLE; MUSCLE; MUSCLE ATROPHY; MUSCLE CELL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAVERTEBRAL MUSCLE DEGENERATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; MUSCULAR ATROPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL STENOSIS;

EID: 84863861740     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824c767e     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional vertebral fracture in adults after spinal deformity surgery using pedicle screw constructs: analysis of morphological features. Spine 2010;35:138-45.
2. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1? Spine 2007;32:2653-61. (Pubitemid 350135375)
3. Shufflebarger H, Suk SI, Mardjetko S. Debate: determining the upper instrumented vertebra in the management of adult degenerative scoliosis: stopping at T10 versus L1. Spine 2006;31:S185-94. (Pubitemid 44337841)
4. McLain RF. The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine 2006;31:S70-9; discussion S104.
5. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis? Spine 2006;31:2343-52. (Pubitemid 44423534)
6. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2005;30:2045-50. (Pubitemid 41362364)
7. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 2007;32:2731-8. (Pubitemid 350135388)
8. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2005;30:1643-9. (Pubitemid 41022428)
9. Helgeson MD, Shah SA, Newton PO, et al. Evaluation of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following pedicle screw, hook, or hybrid instrumentation. Spine 2010;35:177-81.
10. Frazier DD, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, et al. Associations between spinal deformity and outcomes after decompression for spinal stenosis. Spine 1997;22:2025-9. (Pubitemid 28069133)
11. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, et al. Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 1997;22:1123-31. (Pubitemid 27209354)
12. Serhan HA, Varnavas G, Dooris AP, et al. Biomechanics of the posterior lumbar articulating elements. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E1.
13. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis. Spine 2006;31:2359-66. (Pubitemid 44423536)
14. Swank S, Lonstein JE, Moe JH, et al. Surgical treatment of adult scoliosis. A review of two hundred and twenty-two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:268-87. (Pubitemid 11154540)
15. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1497-503. (Pubitemid 38886539)
16. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, et al. Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study. Spine 1995;20:526-31.
17. Penta M, Sandhu A, Fraser RD. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 1995;20:743-7.
18. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT. Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:289-94. (Pubitemid 34257700)
19. Rahm MD, Hall BB. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:392-400. (Pubitemid 26423733)
20. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 1996;21:970-81. (Pubitemid 26127219)
21. Lee CK. Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 1988;13:375-7.
22. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine 1994;19:1745-51. (Pubitemid 24314184)
23. Bridwell KH. Selection of instrumentation and fusion levels for scoliosis: where to start and where to stop. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:1-8.
24. Lee GA, Betz RR, Clements DH III, et al. Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:795-9. (Pubitemid 29181533)
25. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000;25:2940-52; discussion 52.
26. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, et al. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine 2010;35:2224-31.