Normal variations in the morphology of auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms: A study in wistar rats

Neuroscience Research

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 302-311

  Alvarado, Juan Carlos ^a,b   Fuentes Santamaría, Verónica ^a,b   Jareño Flores, Tania ^a,b   Blanco, José Luis ^a,c   Juiz, José M ^a,b,c  

^a Universidad Castilla La Mancha   (Spain)

^b Universidad de Castilla La Mancha   (Spain)

^c Science and Technology Park of Albacete   (Spain)

Author keywords

Animal models; Auditory brainstem responses; Evoked potentials; Waveforms; Wistar rats

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; WAVEFORM; WISTAR RAT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; MALE; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 84863850556     PISSN: 01680102     EISSN: 18728111     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2012.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amedofu G.K., Gopal K.V., Asher J.H., Ahmadizadeh M., Moore E.J. Auditory brainstem responses in Golden Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) affected with the Wh gene. Lab. Anim. Sci. 1999, 49(2):173-178.
2. Attanasio G., Barbara M., Buongiorno G., Cordier A., Mafera B., Piccoli F., Nostro G., Filipo R. Protective effect of the cochlear efferent system during noise exposure. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1999, 884:361-367.
3. Bielefeld E.C., Coling D., Chen G.D., Li M., Tanaka C., Hu B.H., Henderson D. Age-related hearing loss in the Fischer 344/NHsd rat substrain. Hear. Res. 2008, 241(1-2):26-33.
4. Borg E. Auditory thresholds in rats of different age and strain. A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Hear. Res. 1982, 8(2):101-115.
5. Buckmaster P.S., Holliday T.A., Bai S.C., Rogers Q.R. Brainstem auditory evoked potential interwave intervals are prolonged in vitamin B-6-deficient cats. J. Neurobiol. 1993, 123(1):20-26.
6. Burkard R.F., Don M. The auditory brainstem response. Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application 2007, 229-253. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore. Burkard, J.J. Eggermont, M. Don (Eds.).
7. Campo P., Subramaniam M., Henderson D. The effect of 'conditioning' exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure. Hear. Res. 1991, 55(2):195-200.
8. Cediel R., Riquelme R., Contreras J., Díaz A., Varela-Nieto I. Sensorineural hearing loss in insulin-like growth factor I-null mice: a new model of human deafness. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2006, 23(2):587-590.
9. Chen T.J., Chen S.S. Generator study of brainstem auditory evoked potentials by a radiofrequency lesion method in rats. Exp. Brain Res. 1991, 85(3):537-542.
10. Chen Y.S., Tseng F.Y., Liu T.C., Lin-Shiau S.Y., Hsu C.J. Involvement of nitric oxide generation in noise-induced temporary threshold shift in guinea pigs. Hear. Res. 2005, 203(1-2):94-100.
11. Chiappa K.H., Gladstone K.J., Young R.R. Brain stem auditory evoked responses: studies of waveform variations in 50 normal human subjects. Arch. Neurol. 1979, 36(2):81-87.
12. Chiappa K.H. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: methodology. Evoked Potential in Clinical Medicine 2007, 157-197. Lippincott-Raven, New York. K.H. Chiappa (Ed.).
13. Church M.W., Kaltenbach J.A. The hamster's auditory brain stem response as a function of stimulus intensity, tone burst frequency, and hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1993, 14(4):249-257.
14. Church M.W., Blakley B.W., Burgio D.L., Gupta A.K. WR-2721 (Amifostine) ameliorates cisplatin-induced hearing loss but causes neurotoxicity in hamsters: dose-dependent effects. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2004, 5(3):227-237.
15. Church M.W., Jen K.L., Stafferton T., Hotra J.W., Adams B.R. Reduced auditory acuity in rat pups from excess and deficient omega-3 fatty acid consumption by the mother. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2007, 29(2):203-210.
16. Church M.W., Jen K.L., Anumba J.I., Jackson D.A., Adams B.R., Hotra J.W. Excess omega-3 fatty acid consumption by mothers during pregnancy and lactation caused shorter life span and abnormal ABRs in old adult offspring. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2010, 32(2):171-181.
17. Church M.W., Hotra J.W., Holmes P.A., Anumba J.I., Jackson D.A., Adams B.R. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) abnormalities across the life span of rats prenatally exposed to alcohol. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2012, 36(1):83-96.
18. Cooper W.A, Coleman J.R., Newton E.H. Auditory brainstem responses to tonal stimuli in young and aging rats?. Hear. Res. 1990, 43(2-3):171-179.
19. Darrow K.N., Maison S.F., Liberman M.C. Selective removal of lateral olivocochlear efferents increases vulnerability to acute acoustic injury. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97(2):1775-1785.
20. Fujioka M., Kanzaki S., Okano H.J., Masuda M., Ogawa K., Okano H. Proinflammatory cytokines expression in noise-induced damaged cochlea. J. Neurosci. Res. 2006, 83(4):575-583.
21. Garcia-Pino E., Caminos E., Juiz J.M. KCNQ5 reaches synaptic endings in the auditory brainstem at hearing onset and targeting maintenance is activity-dependent. J. Comp. Neurol. 2010, 518(8):1301-1314.
22. Gourévitch B., Doisy T., Avillac M., Edeline J.M. Follow-up of latency and threshold shifts of auditory brainstem responses after single and interrupted acoustic trauma in guinea pig. Brain Res. 2009, 1304:66-79.
23. Hamernik R.P., Ahroon W.A. Sound-induced priming of the chinchilla auditory system. Hear. Res. 1999, 137(1-2):127-136.
24. Hamernik R.P., Qiu W. Correlations among evoked potential thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell loss following various noise exposures in the chinchilla. Hear. Res. 2000, 150(1-2):245-257.
25. Harding G.W., Bohne B.A., Ahmad M. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Hear. Res. 2002, 174(1-2):158-171.
26. Hashimoto I., Ishiyama Y., Yoshimoto T., Nemoto S. Brain-stem auditory-evoked potentials recorded directly from human brain-stem and thalamus. Brain 1981, 104(Pt. 4):841-859.
27. Henderson D., Spongr V., Subramaniam M., Campo P. Anatomical effects of impact noise. Hear. Res. 1994, 76(1-2):101-117.
28. Henry K.R. Differential changes of auditory nerve and brain stem short latency evoked potentials in the laboratory mouse. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1979, 46(4):452-459.
29. Hougaard K.S., Barrenäs M.L., Kristiansen G.B., Lund S.P. No evidence for enhanced noise induced hearing loss after prenatal stress or dexamethasone. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2007, 29(6):613-621.
30. Hu B.H., Cai Q. Acoustic overstimulation modifies Mcl-1 expression in cochlear sensory epithelial cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 88(8):1812-1821.
31. Illing R.B., Kraus K.S., Meidinger M.A. Reconnecting neuronal networks in the auditory brainstem following unilateral deafening. Hear. Res. 2005, 206(1-2):185-199.
32. Kretzmer E.A., Meltzer N.E., Haenggeli C.A., Ryugo D.K. An animal model for cochlear implants. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2004, 130(5):499-508.
33. Kuwada S., Batra R., Maher V.L. Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear. Res. 1986, 21(2):179-192.
34. Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(7):2115-2123.
35. Kujawa S.G., Liberman M.C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after temporary noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(45):14077-14085.
36. Maison S.F., Parker L.L., Young L., Adelman J.P., Zuo J., Liberman M.C. Overexpression of SK2 channels enhances efferent suppression of cochlear responses without enhancing noise resistance. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 97(4):2930-2936.
37. Maison S.F., Casanova E., Holstein G.R., Bettler B., Liberman M.C. Loss of GABAB receptors in cochlear neurons: threshold elevation suggests modulation of outer hair cell function by type II afferent fibers. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2009, 10(1):50-63.
38. Martin M.R., Penix L.P. Comparison of the effects of bicuculline and strychnine on brain stem auditory evoked potentials in the cat. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1983, 78(1):75-77.
39. Miller J.M., Dolan D.F., Raphael Y., Altschuler R.A. Interactive effects of aging with noise induced hearing loss. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 1998, 48:53-61.
40. Møller A.R., Jannetta P.J. Auditory evoked potentials recorded from the cochlear nucleus and its vicinity in man. J. Neurosurg. 1983, 59(6):1013-1018.
41. Møller A.R., Jannetta P.J., Sekhar L.N. Contributions from the auditory nerve to the brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs): results of intracranial recording in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1988, 71(3):198-221.
42. Naito R., Murofushi T., Mizutani M., Kaga K. Auditory brainstem responses, electrocochleograms, and cochlear microphonics in the myelin deficient mutant hamster 'bt'. Hear. Res. 1999, 136(1-2):44-48.
43. Newton E.H., Cooper W.A., Coleman J.R. Rate and frequency interactions in the auditory brainstem response of the adult rat. Hear. Res. 1992, 60(1):73-79.
44. Nordmann A.S., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear. Res. 2000, 139(1-2):13-30.
45. Oliveira D.C., Lima M.A. Low and high frequency tonal threshold audiometry: comparing hearing thresholds between smokers and non-smokers. Braz. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 75(5):738-744.
46. Overbeck G.W., Church M.W. Effects of tone burst frequency and intensity on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) from albino and pigmented rats. Hear. Res. 1992, 59(2):129-137.
47. Parham K., Sun X.M., Kim D. Noninvasive assessment of auditory function in mice: auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Handbook of Mouse Auditory Research: From Behavior to Molecular Biology 2001, 37-58. CRC Press, New York. J.P. Willott (Ed.).
48. Parkkonen L., Fujiki N., Mäkelä J.P. Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(6):1772-1782.
49. Plantz R.G., Williston J.S., Jewett D.L. Spatio-temporal distribution of auditory-evoked far field potentials in rat and cat. Brain Res. 1974, 68(1):55-71.
50. Popelar J., Grecova J., Rybalko N., Syka J. Comparison of noise-induced changes of auditory brainstem and middle latency response amplitudes in rats. Hear. Res. 2008, 245(1-2):82-91.
51. Pukkila M., Zhai S., Virkkala J., Pirvola U., Ylikoski J. The toughening phenomenon in rat's auditory organ. Acta Ophthalmol. Suppl. 1997, 529:59-62.
52. Reichmuth C., Mulsow J., Finneran J.J., Houser D.S., Supin Y.A. Measurement and response characteristics of auditory brainstem responses in pinnipeds. Aquatic Mammals 2007, 33(1):132-150.
53. Schweitzer L. Development of brainstem auditory evoked responses in the hamster. Hear. Res. 1987, 25(2-3):249-255.
54. Shaw N.A. The auditory evoked potential in the rat - a review. Prog. Neurobiol. 1988, 31(1):19-45.
55. Simpson G.V., Knight R.T., Brailowsky S., Prospero-Garcia O., Scabini D. Altered peripheral and brainstem auditory function in aged rats. Brain Res. 1985, 348(1):28-35.
56. Thompson S.K., Zhu X., Frisina R.D. Estrogen blockade reduces auditory feedback in CBA mice. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2006, 135(1):100-105.
57. World Health Organization. 2010. Deafness and hearing impairment. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/.
58. Zuo H., Cui B., She X., Wu M. Changes in Guinea pig cochlear hair cells after sound conditioning and noise exposure. J. Occup. Health 2008, 50(5):373-379.