Potential of GLMM in modelling invasive spread

CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Thiele, J ^a   Markussen, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Convergence; Invasive species; Mixed effects models; Model validation; Review; Zero heavy data

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863847757     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17498848     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20127016     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. O'Hara RB. How to make models add up - a primer on GLMMs. Annales Zoologici Fennici 2009;46:124-37.
2. Robinson GK. That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. Statistical Science 1991;6:15-32.
3. Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araujo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, et al. Methods to account for spatial auto-correlation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 2007;30:609-28. (Pubitemid 350060576)
4. Fieberg J, Matthiopoulos J, Hebblewhite M, Boyce MS, Frair JL. Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2010;365:2233-44.
5. Lambert D. Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics 1992;34:1-14.
6. Welsh AH, Cunningham RB, Donelly CF, Lindenmayer DB. Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros. Ecological Modelling 1996;88:297-308.
7. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA; 1998.
8. Martin TG, Wintle BA, Rhodes JR, Kuhnert PM, Field SA, Low-Choy SJ, et al. Zero tolerance ecology: improving ecological inference by modelling the source of zero observations. Ecology Letters 2005;8:1235-46. (Pubitemid 41532407)
9. Tobin J. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica 1958;26:24-36.
10. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens M H H, et al. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends In Ecology & Evolution 2009;24:127-35.
11. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993;88:9-25.
12. Wolfinger R, O'Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models: a pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1993;4:233-43.
13. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo. In: Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ, editors. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, USA; 1996. p. 1-19.
14. Cheng J, Edwards LJ, Maldonado-Molina MM, Komro KA, Muller KE. Real longitudinal data analysis for real people: Building a good enough mixed model. Statistics in Medicine 2010;29:504-20.
15. Satterthwaite FF. Synthesis of variance. Psychometrika 1941;6:309-16.
16. Kenward MG, Roger JH. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted likelihood. Biometrics 1997;53:983-97. (Pubitemid 27391027)
17. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and SPLUS. Springer, New York, USA; 2000.
18. Zuur AF, leno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York, USA; 2009.
19. Welham S, Thompson R. Likelihood ratio tests for fixed model terms using residual maximum likelihood. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1997;59:701-14. (Pubitemid 127686977)
20. Morrell CH. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 1998;54:1560-8. (Pubitemid 29018637)
21. Self SG, Liang KY. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987;398:605-10.
22. Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Likelihood ratio, score, and Wald tests in a constrained parameter space. American Statistician 2007;61:22-7.
23. Bates D. Ime4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. Springer/lme4.r-forge.r- project.org/book/front.pdf; 2010.
24. Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP. Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology 2006;75:1182-9. (Pubitemid 44175184)
25. Crawley MJ. Statistical Computing: An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester; 2002.
26. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. Springer, New York, USA; 2002.
27. Johnson JB, Omland KS. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004;19:101-8. (Pubitemid 38105895)
28. Keselman HJ, Algina J, Kowalchuk RK, Wolfinger RD. A comparison of two approaches for selecting covariance structures in the analysis of repeated measures. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 1998;27:591-604. (Pubitemid 128445095)
29. Vaida F, Blanchard S. Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models. Biometrika 2005;92:351-70. (Pubitemid 40937640)
30. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best N, Carlin BP, Linde A. Bayesian measure of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 2002;64:583-639.
31. Miaou SP, Song JJ. Bayesian ranking of sites for engineering safety improvements: decision parameter, treatability concept, statistical criterion, and spatial dependence. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2005;37:699-720. (Pubitemid 40753442)
32. Dormann CF, Schweiger O, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Bailey D, et al. Prediction uncertainty of environmental change effects on temperate European biodiversity. Ecology Letters 2008;11:235-44. (Pubitemid 351172048)
33. D'Agostino RB, Stephens MA. Goodness-of-fit techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA; 1986.
34. Ritz C. Goodness-of-fit tests for mixed models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2004;31:443-58. (Pubitemid 39057677)
35. Pierce DA, Schafer DW. Residuals in generalized linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986;81:977-86.
36. Lin DY, Wei LJ, Ying Z. Model-checking techniques based on cumulative residuals. Biometrics 2002;58:1-12. (Pubitemid 34194482)
37. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 1986;72:13-22.
38. Waagepetersen R. A simulation-based goodness-of-fit test for random effects in generalized linear mixed models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2006;33:721-31. (Pubitemid 44748184)
39. Hoist KK. 'gof, R-package for model-diagnostics based on cumulative residuals, version 0.7-6. 2011.
40. McEachern AK, Thomson DM, Chess KA. Climate alters response of an endemic island plant to removal of invasive herbivores. Ecological Applications 2009;19:1574-84.
41. Chun YJ, Kim CG, Moloney KA. Comparison of life-history traits between invasive and native populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) using nonlinear mixed effects model. Aquatic Botany 2010;93:221-6.
42. Tognetti PM, Chaneton EJ, Omacini M, Trebino HJ, Leon R J C. Exotic vs. native plant dominance over 20 years of old-field succession on set-aside farmland in Argentina. Biological Conservation 2010;143:2494-503.
43. Gasso N, Sol D, Pino J, Dana ED, Lloret F, Sanz-Elorza M, et al. Exploring species attributes and site characteristics to assess plant invasions in Spain. Diversity and Distributions 2009;15:50-8.
44. Carl G, Kuhn I. Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and logit models. Ecological Modelling 2007;207(2-4):159-70. (Pubitemid 47362481)
45. Buckley YM, Downey P, Fowler SV, Hill R, Memmot J, Norambuena H, et al. Are invasives bigger? A global study of seed size variation in two invasive shrubs. Ecology 2003;84:1434-40. (Pubitemid 37435731)
46. Brodersen C, Lavergne S, Molofsky J. Genetic variation in photosynthetic characteristics among invasive and native populations of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Biological Invasions 2008;10:1317-25.
47. Xu CY, Julien MH, Fatemi M, Girod C, Van Klinken RD, Gross CL, et al. Phenotypic divergence during the invasion of Phyla canescens in Australia and France: evidence for selection driven evolution. Ecology Letters 2010;13:32-44.