A comparison of two approaches for selecting covariance structures in the analysis of repeated measurements

Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 591-604

  Keselman, H J ^a   Kowalchuk, Rhonda K ^a   Algina, James ^b   Wolfinger, Russell D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c SAS INSTITUTE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Akaike criterion; Schwarz criterion; Unbalanced nonspherical designs

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006524829     PISSN: 03610918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03610919808813497     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). "A new look at the statistical model identification," IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716-723.
2. Algina, J. and Oshima, T.C. (1995). "An improved general approximation test for the main effect in a split plot design," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 149-160.
3. Bozdogan, H. (1987). "Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions," Psychometrika, 52, 345 -370.
4. Carlin, B.P. and Louis, T.A. (1996). "Bayes and empirical bayes methods for data analysis," Chapman and Hall.
5. Greenhouse, S.W. and Geisser, S. (1959). "On methods in the analysis of profile data," Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
6. Huvnh, H.S. and Feldt, L. (1970). "Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582-1589.
7. Huynh, H. and Feldt, L.S. (1976). "Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs," Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
8. Jennrich, R.I. and Schluchter, M.D. (1986). "Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices," Biometrics, 42, 805-820.
9. Keselman, H.J. and Algina, J. (1996). "The analysis of higher-order repeated measures designs," In Advances in Social Science Methodology, Volume 4, ed. B. Thompson, Greenwich, Conneticuit: JAI Press, (pp. 45-70).
10. Keselman, H.J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R.K. and Wolfinger, R.D. (1997a). "A comparison of recent approaches to the analysis of repeated measurements," Unpublished manuscript.
11. Keselman, H.J., Algina, J., Kowalchuk, R.K. and Wolfinger, R.D. (1997b). "The analysis of repeated measurements with mixed-model Satterthwiate F tests," Unpublished manuscript.
12. Keselman, H.J., Carriere, K.C. and Lix, L.M. (1993). "Testing repeated measures hypotheses when covariance matrices are heterogeneous," Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 305-319.
13. Keselman, H.J. and Keselman, J.C. (1993). "Analysis of repeated measurements," In L.K. Edwards (Ed.) Applied analysis of variance in behavioral science, 105-145. New York: Marcel Dekker.
14. Keselman, J.C., Lix, L.M. and Keselman, H.J. (1996). "The analysis of repeated measurements: A quantitative research synthesis," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 49, 275-298.
15. Keselman, J.C. and Keselman, H.J. (1990). "Analysing unbalanced repeated measures designs," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 43, 265-282.
16. Kowalchuk, R.K., Lix, L.M. and Keselman, H.J. (1996). "The analysis of repeated measures designs," paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, 1996, Banff, Alberta.
17. Laird, N. and Ware, J.H. (1982). "Random-effects models for longitudinal data," Biometrics, 38, 963-974.
18. Little, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W. and Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
19. Lix, L.M. and Keselman, H.J. (1995). "Approximate degrees of freedom tests: A unified perspective on testing for mean equality," Psychological Bulletin, 117, 547-560.
20. McLean, R.A. and Sanders, W.L. (1988). "Approximating degrees of freedom for standard errors in mixed linear models," Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section, American Statistical Association, New Orleans, pp. 50 -59.
21. Mendoza, J.L. (1980). "A Significance test for multisample sphericity," Psychometrika, 45, 495-498.
22. Rogan, J.C., Keselman, H.J. and Mendoza, J.L. (1979). "Analysis of repeated measurements," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32, 269-286.
23. Rouanet, H. and Lepine, D. (1970). "Comparison between treatments in a repeated measures design: ANOVA and multivariate methods," British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 147-163.
24. SAS Institute. (1989). "SAS/IML sowtware: Usage and reference, Version 6," Cary, NC: Author.
25. SAS Institute. (1990). "SAS/STAT User's Guide Vol. 2, GLM-VARCOMP, Version 6, 4th Ed," Cary, NC: Author.
26. SAS Institute. (1995). "Introduction to the MIXED procedure: Course Notes," Cary, NC: Author.
27. SAS Institute. (1996). "SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11," Cary, NC: Author.
28. Schwarz, G. (1978). "Estimating the dimension of a model," Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
29. Wolfinger, R.D. (1993). "Covariance structure selection in general mixed models," Communication in Statistics-Simulation, 22, 1079-1106.
30. Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). "Heterogeneous variance-covariance structures for repeated measurements," Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1, 205-230.
31. Wright, S.P. (1995). "Adjusted F tests for repeated measures with the MIXED procedure," Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC.