Adverse conditions improve distinguishability of auditory, motor, and perceptuo-motor theories of speech perception: An exploratory Bayesian modelling study

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 7-8, 2012, Pages 1240-1263

  Moulin Frier, C ^a   Laurent, R ^a   Bessiere P ^a,b   Schwartz, J L ^a   Diard, J ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory, motor, and perceptuo motor theories of speech communication; Bayesian modelling; Model distinguishability; Speech perception in adverse conditions

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; HUMAN; MOTOR SYSTEM; NOISE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SENSORY STIMULATION; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THEORY; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VOCAL CORD;

EID: 84863829770     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.645313     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Badin, P. and Fant, G. 1984. Notes on vocal tract computations. STL-QPSR, 2-3: 53-108.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind, Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
3. Bessière, P., Laugier, C., & Riegwart, R 2008. Probabilistic reasoning and decision making in sensory-motor systems: Vol. 46 of Springer tracts in advanced robotics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L. 1989. Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6: 201-251.
5. Colas, F., Diard, J. and Bessière, P. 2010. Common Bayesian models for common cognitive issues. Acta Biotheoretica, 58(2-3): 191-216.
6. D'Ausilio, A., Pulvermüller, F., Salmas, P., Bufalari, I., Begliomini, C. and Fadiga, L. 2009. The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology, 19: 381-385.
7. Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J. and Holt, L. L. 2004. Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 74: 431-461.
8. Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G. and Rizzolatti, G. 2002. Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15: 399-402.
9. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A. and Turvey, M. T. 2006. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13: 361-377.
10. Gilet, E., Diard, J. and Bessière, P. 2011. Bayesian action-perception computational model: Interaction of production and recognition of cursive letters. PLoS ONE, 6(6): e20387
11. Guenther, F. H. 2006. Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39: 350-365.
12. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M. and Johnson, D. 1998. A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105: 611-633.
13. Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8: 393-402.
14. Jacquemot, C., Dupoux, E. and Bachoud-Levi, A. C. 2007. Breaking the mirror: Asymmetrical disconnection between the phonological input and output codes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24: 3-22.
15. Körding, K. P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W. J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J. B. and Shams, L. 2007. Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2(9): 943
16. Lebeltel, O., Bessière, P., Diard, J. and Mazer, E. 2004. Bayesian robots programming. Autonomous Robots, 16(1): 49-79.
17. Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. 1985. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21: 1-36.
18. Maeda, S. 1989. "Compensatory articulation during speech: Evidence from the analysis and synthesis of vocal-tract shapes using an articulatory model". In Speech production and modelling, Edited by: Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A. 131-149. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Maeda, S. and Honda, K. 1994. From EMG to formant patterns of vowels: The implication of vowel spaces. Phonetica, 51: 17-19.
20. Meister, I. G., Wilson, S. M., Deblieck, C., Wu, A. D. and Iacoboni, M. 2007. The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception. Current Biology, 17: 1692-1696.
21. Moore, R. K. 2007. Spoken language processing: Piecing together the puzzle. Speech Communication, 49: 418-435.
22. Moulin-Frier, C., Schwartz, J. L., Diard, J., & Bessière, P. 2010. A unified theoretical Bayesian model of speech communication. 1st conference on Applied Digital Human Modeling, Miami, USA.
23. Moulin-Frier, C., Schwartz, J. L., Diard, J., & Bessière, P. 2011. Emergence of articulatory-acoustic systems from deictic interaction games in a "Vocalize to Localize" frame work. In A. Vilain, J. L. Schwartz, C. Abry, & J. Vauclair, Primate communication and human language-Vocalisation, gestures, imitation and deixis in humans and non-humans 191-218. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
24. Myung, J. I. and Pitt, M. A. 2009. Optimal experimental design for model discrimination. Psychological Review, 116(3): 499-518.
25. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2): 131-141.
26. Sato, M., Grabski, K., Glenberg, A., Brisebois, A., Basirat, A., Ménard, L., & Cattaneo, L. 2011. Articulatory bias in speech categorization: Evidence from use-induced motor plasticity. Cortex, 47 8, 1001-1003.
27. Schwartz, J. L., Basirat, A., Ménard, L., & Sato, M. 2010. The perception-for-action-control theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. Journal of Neurolinguistics in press.
28. Schwartz, J. L., Boë, L. J., Vallée, N. and Abry, C. 1997. The dispersion-focalization theory of vowel systems. Journal of Phonetics, 25: 255-286.
29. Schwartz, J. L., Robert-Ribes, J. and Escudier, P. 1998. "Ten years after Summerfield A taxonomy of models for audiovisual fusion in speech perception". In Hearing by eye, II. Perspectives and directions in research on audiovisual aspects of language processing, Edited by: Campbell, R., Dodd, B. and Burnham, D. 85-108. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
30. Scott, S. K., McGettigan, C. and Eisner, F. 2009. A little more conversation, a little less action: Candidate roles for motor cortex in speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(4): 295-302.
31. Skipper, J. I., Van Wassenhove, V., Nusbaum, H. C. and Small, S. L. 2007. Hearing lips and seeing voices: How cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception. Cerebral Cortex, 17: 2387-2399.
32. Stevens, K. N. 1972. "The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data". In Human communication: A unified view, Edited by: Davis, E. E. Jr. and Denes, P. B. 51-66. New-York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Stevens, K. N. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. J. Phonetics, 17: 3-45.
34. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. and Moll, H. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28: 675-691.
35. Viviani, P. and Stucchi, N. 1992. Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18: 603-623.