Combined effects of Fe(II) and oxidizing radiolysis products on UO 2 and PuO 2 dissolution in a system containing solid UO 2 and PuO 2

Journal of Nuclear Materials

Volumn 430, Issue 1-3, 2012, Pages 1-5

  Amme, Marcus ^a   Pehrman, Reijo ^a,b   Deutsch, Rudolf ^c   Roth, Olivia ^d   Jonsson, Mats ^d  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^d ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALPHA RADIATION; COMBINED EFFECT; CONCENTRATION OF FE; FENTON REACTIONS; FIELD INDUCED; NEAR FIELDS; OXYGEN-FREE BATCH REACTOR; RADIOLYSIS PRODUCTS; RADIOLYTIC OXIDATION; REACTION PARTNERS; SPENT NUCLEAR FUELS; URANIUM CONCENTRATION; WATER RADIOLYSIS;

BATCH REACTORS; DISSOLUTION; IRON COMPOUNDS; OXYGEN; PLUTONIUM; RADIATION CHEMISTRY; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REDOX REACTIONS; SORPTION; URANIUM;

RADIOLYSIS;

EID: 84863818908     PISSN: 00223115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.06.036     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. L. Johnson, and D. Shoesmith Spent fuel W. Lutze, R. Ewing, Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future 1988 Elsevier Amsterdam
2. R. Silva, and H. Nitsche Radiochim. Acta 70 71 1995 377 396
3. W. Miller, R. Alexander, N. Chapman, I. McKinley, and J. Smellie Geological Disposal of Radioactive Wastes & Natural Analogues, Waste Management Series 2 2000 Pergamon/Elsevier Amsterdam
4. P. Burns, and R. Finch Uranium: Mineralogy, Geochemistry and the Environment, Reviews in Mineralogy 38 1999 Mineralogical Society of America Washington, DC
5. D. Shoesmith J. Nucl. Mat. 282 2000 1 31
6. H. Christensen Nucl. Technol. 124 1998 165 174
7. 2 pellets in chloride brine Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.) 114 2002 697 704
8. C. Corbel, and G. Sattonnay Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B179 2001 225 229
9. W. Schumb, C. Satterfield, and R. Wentworth Hydrogen Peroxide, American Chemical Society Monograph Series 128 1955 Reinhold Publishing Corp./Chapman & Hall New York/London
10. M. Amme Radiochim. Acta 90 2002 399 406
11. A. Loida, B. Grambow, and H. Geckeis J. Nucl. Mater. 238 1996 11 22
12. S. Savoye, L. Legrand, G. Sagon, S. Lecomte, A. Chausse, R. Mesina, and P. Toulhoat Corros. Sci. 43 2001 2049 2064
13. NF-PRO Final Report, Understanding and physical and numerical modelling of the key processes in the near field and their coupling for different host rocks and repository strategies, European Commission, 2008.
14. 2 fuel matrix J. Nucl. Mat. 341 2005 62 82
15. S. Stroes-Gascoyne, F. Garisto, and J. Betteridge J. Nucl. Mat. 346 2005 5 15
16. M. Amme, W. Bors, C. Michel, K. Stettmaier, G. Rasmussen, and M. Betti Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 2005 221 229
17. H. Bader, V. Sturzenegger, and J. Hoigné Water Res. 22 1988 1109 1115
18. L. Stookey Anal. Chem. 42 1970 779 781
19. C. Lousada, and M. Jonsson J. Phys. Chem. C114 2010 11202 11208
20. S. Nilsson, and M. Jonsson J. Nucl. Mat. 410 2011 89 93
21. C. Lousada, M. Trummer, and M. Jonsson Reactivity of H2O2 towards different UO2-based materials: The relative impact of radiolysis products revisited 2011 J. Nucl Mat 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.06.003
22. B. Pastina, and J. LaVerne J. Phys. Chem. A105 2001 9316 9322
23. R. Zepp, B. Faust, and J. Hoigné Environ. Sci. Technol. 26 1992 313 319
24. D. Cui, and K. Spahiu Radiochim. Acta 90 2002 623 628
25. X. Du, and B. Boonchayaanant Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 2011 4718 4725
26. D.M. Singer, S.M. Chatman, E.S. Ilton, K.M. Rosso, J.F. Banfield, and G.A. Waychunas Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 2012 3821 3830
27. R. Pehrman, M. Amme, O. Roth, E. Ekeroth, and M. Jonsson J. Nucl. Mat. 397 2010 128 131