Inhibitory control in number-conservation and class-inclusion tasks: A neo-Piagetian inter-task priming study

Cognitive Development

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 283-298

  Borst, Grégoire ^a   Poirel, Nicolas ^a   Pineau, Arlette ^a   Cassotti, Mathieu ^a,c   Houdé, Olivier ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE DE FRANCE   (France)

^c MINES ParisTech   (France)

Author keywords

Class inclusion; Cognitive development; Inhibition; Number conservation; Reversibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863811757     PISSN: 08852014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bell M.A., Fox N.A. The relations between frontal brain electrical activity and cognitive development during infancy. Child Development 1992, 63:1142-1163.
2. Bjorklund D.F., Harnishfeger K.K. The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. Developmental Review 1990, 10:48-71.
3. Casey B.J., Tottenham N., Liston C., Durston S. Imaging the developing brain: What have we learned about cognitive development?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:104-109.
4. Casey B.J., Trainor R., Orendi J., Shubert A., Nystrom L., Giedd J.N., et al. A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of Go/NoGo task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:835-847.
5. Daurignac E., Houdé O., Jouvent R. Negative priming in a numerical Piaget-like task in adults as evidenced by ERP. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:730-736.
6. Davidson M.C., Amso D., Anderson L.C., Diamond A. Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2037-2078.
7. Dempster F.N. Interference and inhibition in cognition: An historical perspective. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, 3-26. Academic Press, New York. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
8. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, Academic Press, New York. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
9. Diamond A. Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition 1991, 67-110. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Carey, R. Gelman (Eds.).
10. Diamond A. Understanding the A-not-B error: Working memory vs. reinforced response, or active vs. latent trace. Developmental Science 1998, 1:185-189.
11. Diamond A. Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. Principles of frontal lobe function 2002, 466-503. Oxford University Press, London. D.T. Stuss, R.T. Knights (Eds.).
12. Diamond A., Goldman-Rakic P. Comparison of human infants and rhesus monkeys on Piaget's AB task: Evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 1989, 74:24-40.
13. Gerstadt C.L., Hong Y.J., Diamond A. The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition 1994, 53:129-153.
14. Gogtay N., Giedd J.N., Lusk L., Hayashi K.M., Greenstein D., Vaituzis A.C., et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:8174-8179.
15. Harnishfeger K.K. The development of cognitive inhibition. Interference and inhibition in cognition 1995, 175-204. Academic Press, New York. F.N. Dempster, C.J. Brainerd (Eds.).
16. Houdé O. Numerical development: From the infant to the child. Wynn's (1992) paradigm in 2- and 3-year-olds. Cognitive Development 1997, 12:373-392.
17. Houdé O. Inhibition and cognitive development: Object, number, categorization, and reasoning. Cognitive Development 2000, 15:63-73.
18. Houdé O. Interference and inhibition (psychology of -). International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 2001, 7718-7722. Elsevier Science, Oxford. N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Eds.).
19. Houdé O., Guichart E. Negative priming effect after inhibition of number/length interference in a Piaget-like task. Developmental Science 2001, 4:119-123.
20. Houdé O., Pineau A., Leroux G., Poirel N., Perchey G., Lanoë C., et al. Functional MRI study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children: A neo-Piagetian approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2011, 110:332-346.
21. Inhelder B., Piaget J. The early growth of logic in the child 1964, Routledge and Kegan, New York, (original in French, 1959).
22. Markman E. Empirical versus logical solutions to part-whole comparison problems concerning classes and collections. Child Development 1978, 49:168-177.
23. Markman E. Categorization and naming in children 1989, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Pascual-Leone J. Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development, toward an integration 1988, Elsevier, North Holland. A. Demetriou (Ed.).
25. Perret P., Paour J.-L., Blaye A. Respective contribution of inhibition and knowledge levels in class inclusion development: A negative priming study. Developmental Science 2003, 6:283-286.
26. Piaget J. The child's conception of number 1952, Routledge and Kegan, London, (original in French, Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A., 1941).
27. Piaget J. Piaget's theory. Handbook of child psychology 1984, 103-128. Wiley, New York. P.H. Mussen (Ed.).
28. Pritchard V.E., Neumann E. Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies: Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45:272-283.
29. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
30. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Duhoux S., Dolan R.J., Driver J. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and implicit visual memory: Suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17:1245-1260.