Accuracy of aortic annular measurements obtained from three-dimensional echocardiography, CT and MRI: Human in vitro and in vivo studies

Heart

Volumn 98, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 1146-1152

  Tsang, Wendy ^a   Bateman, Michael G ^b   Weinert, Lynn ^a   Pellegrini, Gian ^c   Mor Avi, Victor ^a   Sugeng, Lissa ^d   Yeung, Hubert ^c   Patel, Amit R ^a   Hill, Alexander J ^c   Iaizzo, Paul A ^b   Lang, Roberto M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; IOPROMIDE;

ACCURACY; AORTA; AORTA ANNULUS; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AORTA, THORACIC; AORTIC DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 84863811008     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302074     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statisticse2011 update: a report from the American heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:e18-209.
2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11. (Pubitemid 44353666)
3. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 2002;106:3006-8. (Pubitemid 35440280)
4. Buellesfeld L, Windecker S. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the evidence is catching up with reality. Eur Heart J 2011;32:133-7.
5. Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M, et al. Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Heart 2011;97:899-906.
6. Detaint D, Lepage L, Himbert D, et al. Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:821-7.
7. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:321-30. (Pubitemid 351681425)
8. Schoenhagen P, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of the aortic valve and aortic root with computed tomography: new standards in an era of transcatheter valve repair/implantation. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2079-86.
9. Moss RR, Ivens E, Pasupati S, et al. Role of echocardiography in percutaneous aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:15-24. (Pubitemid 351445392)
10. Kurra V, Kapadia SR, Tuzcu EM, et al. Pre-procedural imaging of aortic root orientation and dimensions: comparison between X-ray angiographic planar imaging and 3-dimensional multidetector row computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:105-13.
11. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty JM, Brochet E, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:186-94.
12. Burman ED, Keegan J, Kilner PJ. Aortic root measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: specification of planes and lines of measurement and corresponding normal values. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:104-13.
13. Ng AC, Delgado V, van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3- dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:94-102.
14. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Al-Attar N, et al. Transcatheter valve implantation for patients with aortic stenosis: a position statement from the European Association of Cardio- Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2008;29:1463-70. (Pubitemid 351806497)
15. Altiok E, Koos R, Schroder J, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques for measurement of aortic annulus diameters before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Heart 2011;97:1578-84.
16. Anderson SE, Hill AJ, Iaizzo PA. Microanatomy of human left ventricular coronary veins. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2009;292:23-8.
17. Descoutures F, Himbert D, Lepage L, et al. Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1410-17. (Pubitemid 351806479)
18. Fan CM, Liu X, Panidis JP, et al. Prediction of Homograft aortic valve size by transthoracic and transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiography 1997;14:345-8. (Pubitemid 27329745)
19. Koos R, Altiok E, Mahnken AH, et al. Evaluation of aortic root for definition of prosthesis size by magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac computed tomography: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. Published Online First: 9 February 2011. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01. 044
20. Paelinck BP, Van Herck PL, Rodrigus I, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates. Am J Cardiol 2011;108:92-8.
21. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Schoenhagen P. Multimodality quantitative imaging of aortic root for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: more complex than it appears. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:195-7.