The effects of freezing on the mechanical properties of bone

Open Bone Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 14-19

  Kaye, Bryan ^a   Randall, Connor ^a   Walsh, Daniel ^a   Hansma, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone diagnostic instrument; Bone fracture; Cryopreservation; Freezing; Reference point indentation; Storage techniques

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CATTLE DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAPHYSIS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FREEZE THAWING; FREEZING; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA FRACTURE;

EID: 84863810183     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18765254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1876525401204010014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Allen M and Burr D. Mineralization, microdamage, and matrix:How bisphosphonates influence material properties of bone. Bone key Osteovision 2007; 4: 49-60.
2. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Mechanisms of disease Bone quality Thematerial and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2250-61.
3. Bouxsein ML. Bone quality: where do we go from here?Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: S118-27.
4. Diez-Perez A, Güerri R, Nogues X, et al. Microindentation for invivo measurement of bone tissue mechanical properties in humans. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25, 1877-85.
5. Hansma PK, Yu H, Schultz D, et al. The tissue diagnosticinstrument. Rev Sci Instrum 2009; 80: 054303.
6. Hansma PK, Turner PJ and Fantner GE. Bone diagnosticinstrument. Rev Sci Instrum 2006; 77: 075105.
7. Randall C, Mathews P, Yurtsev E. The bone diagnostic instrumentIII: testing mouse femora. Rev Sci Instrum 2009; 80: 065108.
8. Paul Hansma PT, Barney D, Eugene Y, et al., The bone diagnosticinstrument II: Indentation distance increase. Rev Sci Instrum 2008; 79: 064303.
9. Hansma PK. A new bone diagnostic instrument: the osteoprobe II. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22: S226-7.
10. Cowin SC. Bone mechanics handbook. USA: CRC Press 2001.
11. Rubinsky B. Principles of low temperature preservation. Heart Fail 2003; 8: 227-84.
12. thSep, 2011]; Available from: http://www.planer.com/company/news/146-child-born-with-parents-semen-stored-for-22-years.html
13. th Sep, 2010]; Availablefrom: http://www.planer.com/company/news/324-twins-born-16years-apart.html
14. Weaver JK. The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint SurgAm 1966; 48: 273-88.
15. Sedlin ED. A rheologic model for cortical bone. A study of thephysical properties of human femoral samples. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1965; (Suppl. 83): 1-77.
16. Kang JS, Kim NH. The biomechanical properties of deep freezingand freeze drying bones and their biomechanical changes after in vivo allograft. Yonsei Med J 1995; 36: 332.
17. Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC, et al. Effects offreezing and freeze-drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone. J Orthop Res 1984; 1: 405-11.
18. Akkus O, Polyakova-Akkus A, Adar F, Schaffler MB. Aging ofmicrostructural compartments in human compact bone. J Bone Miner Res 2003; 18: 1012-9.
19. th ed., Edinburgh; New York: 2005, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. p. 1627.
20. Danielsen CC. Age-related thermal stability and susceptibility toproteolysis of rat bone collagen. Biochem J 1990; 272: 697-701.
21. Habelitz S, Marshall GW Jr, Balooch M, Marshall SJ. Nanoindentation and storage of teeth. J Biomech 2002; 35: 995-8.
22. Weaver JK. The Microscopic Hardness of Bone. J Bone Joint Surg 1966; (48-A): 273.
23. Guidoni G, Swain M, Jager I. Nanoindentation of wet and drycompact bone: Influence of environment and indenter tip geometry on the indentation modulus. Philos Mag 2010; 90: 553-65.
24. th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1994, xiv, 708, p. 8 of plates.
25. Brown N, Saputa C, Black J. Young's modulus of living humanbone. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1981; 6: 41.