The ecosystem approach and planning and management of the marine environment

The Ecosystem Approach to Marine Planning and Management

Volumn 9781849775533, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-33

  Kidd, Sue ^a   Maltby, Ed ^a   Robinson, Leonie ^a   Barker, Adam ^b   Lumb, Chris ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; MARINE ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84863806817     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781849775533     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Allen, D. E. (1976) The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History, Pelican Books, London
2. Backer, H. And Leppanen, J. M. (2008) ‘The HELCOM system of a vision, strategic goals and ecological objectives: Implementing an ecosystem approach to the management of human activities in the Baltic Sea‘, Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, vol 18, pp321-334
3. Backer, H., Leppanen, J.-M., Brusendorff, A.C., Forsius, K., Stankiewicz, M., Mehtonen J., Pyhala, M., Laamanen, M., Paulomaki, H., Vlasov, N. And Haaranen, T. (2009) ‘HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan-A regional programme of measures for the marine environment based on the Ecosystem Approach‘, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol 60, no 5, pp642-649
4. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Newbury Park, London
5. Bengston, D., Xu, G. and Fan, D. (2001) ‘Attitudes toward ecosystem management in the United States, 1992-1998‘, Society & Natural Resources, vol 14, no 6, pp471-487
6. Bruntland, G. (ed) (1987) Our Common Future: The World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford
7. CBD COP (Convention on Biological Diversity, Conference of the Parties) (2000) Fifth Meeting, Decision V/6 The Ecosystem Approach, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
8. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1996) Demonstration Programme on Integrated Management ofCoastalZones, European Commission Services, Information Document XI/79/96, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
9. CEC (2007) An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg CONSSO
10. CONSSO (2002) Bergen Declaration, Ministerial declaration of the fifth international conference on the protection for the North Sea, 20-21 March 2002, CONSSO, Bergen
11. Constable, A. J., de la Mare, W. K., Agnew, D. J., Everson, I. and Miller, D. (2000) ‘Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: Practical implementation of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR)‘, Ices Journal of Marine Science, 57 pp78-79
12. Danter, K. J., Griest, D. L., Mullins, G. W. and Norland, E. (2000) ‘Organizational change as a component of ecosystem management’, Society & Natural Resources, vol 13, no 6, pp537-548
13. Davoudi, S. (2001) ‘Planning and the twin discourses of sustainability’, in A. Layard, Planning for a Sustainable Future, Spon, London
14. Day, J. (2008) ‘The need and practice of monitoring, evaluating and adapting marine planning and management: Lessons from the Great Barrier Reef, Marine Policy, vol 32, pp823-831
15. Defra (2009) Our Seas: A Shared Resource-High Level Marine Objectives, Defra, London
16. Dickens, P. (2004) Society and Nature, Polity, Cambridge
17. Endter-Wada, J., Blahna, D., Krannich, R. and Brunson, M. (1998) ‘A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management‘, Ecological Applications, vol 8, no 3, pp891-904
18. Fee, E., Gerber, E., Rust, J., Haggenmueller, K., Korn, H. and Ibiscf, P. (2009) ‘Stuck in the clouds: Bringing the CBD's ecosystem approach for conservation management down to Earth in Canada and Germany’, Journal for Nature Conservation, vol 17, no 4, pp212-227
19. Frid, C., Paramor, O. and Scott, C. (2006) ‘Ecosystem-based management of fisheries: Is science limiting?’, ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol 63, no 9, pp1567-1572
20. Glowka, L., Burhenne-Guilmin, F. and Synge, H. (1994) A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity, IUCN, Cambridge
21. Harris, H. J., Sager, P. E., Yarbrough, C. J. and Day, H. J. (1987) ‘Evolution of water resource management: A Laurentian Great Lakes case study‘, International Journal of Environmental Studies, vol 29, no 1, pp53-70
22. Hartig, J. H., Zarull A. Z. and Law, N. L. (1998) ‘An ecosystem approach to Great Lakes management: Practical steps‘, Journal of Great Lakes Research, vol, 24, no 3, pp739-750
23. Hewitt, R. P. and Low, E. H. (2000) ‘The fishery on Antarctic krill: Defining an ecosystem approach to management‘, Reviews in Fisheries Science, vol 8, no 3, pp235-298
24. Hillman, M., Aplin, G. and Brierley, G. (2003) ‘The importance of process in ecosystem management: Lessons from the Lachlan catchment, New South Wales, Australia’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 46, no 2, pp219-237
25. Holling, C. S. (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, Wiley, Chichester
26. Holling, C. S. (1993) ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems‘, Annual review of Ecological Systems, vol 4, pp1-23
27. Holling, C. S. (2001) ‘Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems‘, Ecosystems, vol 4, pp390-405
28. Hyun, K. (2005) ‘Transboundary solutions to environmental problems in the Gulf of California Large Marine Ecosystem’, Coastal Management, vol 33, no 4, pp435-445
29. Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force (2009) Interim Framework for Effective Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning, White House Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC
30. International Institute for Sustainable Development (2006) Earth Negotiations Bulletin, vol 25, no 31, Summary of the Seventh Meeting of the Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea, IISD, Winnipeg
31. Irwin, A. (2001) Sociology and the Environment, Polity, Cambridge
32. Juda, L. (1999) ‘Considerations in developing a functional approach to the governance of large marine ecosystems’, Ocean Development & International Law, vol 30, no 2, pp89-125
33. Kidd, S. (2007) ‘Landscape planning at the regional scale‘, in M. Roe (ed) Landscape and Sustainability, 2nd edition, Spon, Abingdon, pp118-137
34. Klug, H. (2002) ‘Straining the law: Conflicting legal premises and the governance of aquatic resources’, Society & Natural Resources, vol 15, no 8, pp693-707
35. Laffoley, D. Da., Maltby, E., Vincent, M. A., Mee, L., Dunn, E., Gilliland, P., Hamer, J. P., Mortimer, D. and Pound, D. (2004) The Ecosystem Approach: Coherent Actions for Marine and Coastal Environments, English Nature, Peterborough
36. Lamont. A. (2006) ‘Policy characterization of ecosystem management’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol 113, pp5-18
37. Lindblom, C. (1959) ‘The science of muddling through’, Public Administration Review, (reprinted in A. Faludi (1973) A Reader in Planning Theory, Pergamon, Oxford)
38. Maes, F. (2008) ‘The international legal framework for marine spatial planning’, Marine Policy, vol 32, pp797-810
39. Maltby, E. (2006) ‘Wetland conservation and management: Questions for science and society in applying the ecosystem approach‘, Ecological Studies, vol 191, pp93-115
40. Maltby, E., Holdgate, M., Acreman, M. and Weir, A (1999) Ecosystem Management: Questions for Science and Society, IUCN CEM and RHIER, London
41. Margerum, R. and Born, S. (1995) ‘Integrated environmental management: Moving from theory to practice’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol 38, pp371-391
42. Marten, G. (2001) Human Ecology, Earthscan, London
43. McLoughlin, B. (1969) Urban and Regional Planning: A Systems Approach, Faber & Faber, London
44. More, T. (1996) ‘Forestry's fuzzy concepts: An examination of ecosystem management’, Journal of Forestry, vol 94, no 19, pp23-24
45. MSPP Consortium (2006) Marine Spatial Planning Pilot, MSPP, London
46. Pearce D. W., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E. B. (1989) Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London
47. SBSTTA (Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice) (2007) In-depth Review of the Application of the Ecosystem Approach, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/12/2, Secretariat of the CBD, Montreal
48. Scoones, I. (1999) ‘New ecology and the social sciences: What prospects for fruitful engagement?’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol 28, pp479-507
49. Secretariat of the CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2010) ‘Ecosystem Approach’, Secretariat of the CBD, Montreal www.cbd.int/ecosystem, accessed 20 June 2010
50. Secretariat of the CBD (2010b) ‘Ecosystem Approach Source Book‘, Secretariat of the CBD, Montreal, www.cbd.int/ecosystem/sourcebook, accessed 20 June 2010
51. Shepherd, J. (2008) The Ecosystem Approach: Learning from Experience, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge
52. Smith, R. D. and Maltby, E. (2003) Using the Ecosystem Approach to Implement the Convention on Biological Diversity: Key Issues and Case Studies, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge
53. The Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, the Bureau of the Convention on Wetlands and the World Wide Fund for Nature (2002) Sustainable Management of Water Resources: The Need for a Holistic Ecosystem Approach, Ramsar COP8 DOC. 32, Secretariat to the Ramsar Convention, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge
54. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2002) Global Environmental Outlook 3, Earthscan, London
55. UNEP (2010) Regional Seas Programme, www.unep.org/regionalseas/about/default.asp, accessed 20 April 2010
56. Wang H. (2004) ‘An evaluation of the modular approach to the assessment and management of large marine ecosystems’, Ocean Development and International Law, vol 35, pp267-286