Modeling access mode choice for inter-suburban commuter rail

Journal of Public Transportation

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 23-42

  Bergman, Åsa ^a   Gliebe, John ^a   Strathman, James ^a  

^a PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863802034     PISSN: 1077291X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.14.4.2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. Lerman. 1987. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
2. Broach, J., J. Gliebe, and J. Dill. 2009. Development of a multi-class bicyclist route choice model using revealed preference data. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Jaipur, India.
3. Cambridge Systematics. 2002. NCTCOG Mode Choice Model estimation documentation.
4. Cervero, R., and M. Duncan. 2002. Residential self selection and rail commuting: A nested logit analysis. 2008 revision.
5. Cervero, R. 2001. Walk-and-ride: Factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. Journal of Public Transportation 3(4): 1-23.
6. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research D 2(3): 199-219.
7. Debrezion, G., E. Pels, and P. Rietveld. 2009. Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice. Transportation Research E 45: 270-283.
8. Evans, J., R. Pratt, A. Stryker, and J. Kuzmyak. 2007. TCRP Report 95: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes. Chapter 17: Transit Oriented Development. Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington.
9. Hadj-Chikh, G., and G. Thompson. 1998. Reaching jobs in the suburbs. Tri-Rail in South Florida. Transportation Research Record 1618:14-21.
10. Koppelman, F., and C. Bhat. 2006. A Self-instructing course in mode choice modeling: Multinomial and Nested Logit models. Prepared for U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Transit Administration.
11. Krizek, K., and A. El-Geneidy. 2007. Segmenting preferences and habits of transit users and non-users. Journal of Public Transportation 10(3): 71-94.
12. Kurth, D.L., C. Chang, and P. Costinett.1991. Enhancements to circulator-distributor models for Chicago central area based on recently collected survey data. Transportation Research Record 1443: 11-20.
13. Loutzenheiser, D. 1997. Pedestrian access to transit: Model of walk trips and their design and urban form determinants around Bay Area Rapid Transit stations. Transportation Research Record 1604: 40-49.
14. McFadden, D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (ed), Frontiers in Econometrics, 105-142. New York: Academic Press.
15. Metro. 2008. Metro travel forecasting 2008 trip-based demand model methodology report.
16. Mid-America Regional Council (MARC). 2002. Commuter rail feasibility study.
17. Oregongasprices. com. 2009. Historical price charts. Accessed August 30, 2010. http://www.oregongasprices.com/retail_price_chart.aspx.
18. Schwanen, T., and P. Mokhtarian. 2005. What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences towards neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography 13(1): 83-99.
19. Taylor, B., and C. Fink. 2001. The Factors influencing transit ridership: A review and analysis of the ridership literature. Working paper. UCLA Department of Urban Planning.
20. Train, K. 2009. Discrete Choice Modeling Methods with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. TriMet. 2010. Westside express service passenger study.
22. U.S. Department of Energy. 2009. Fuel Economy Guide.
23. Whately, L., B. Friel, and G. Thompson. 1997. Analysis of suburb-to-suburb commuter rail potential: Metrolink in southern California. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings 2(8): 175-18.