A Complex quest: The development and research of underachievement interventions for gifted students

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 678-694

  Rubenstein, Lisa Davia ^a   Siegle, Del ^b   Reis, Sally M ^b   Mccoach, D Betsy ^b   Burton, Meredith Greene ^c  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c Bridgetown Regional High School   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863783893     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.21620     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2011). The power of small wins. Harvard Business Review, 89(5), 70-80.
2. American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2006, February). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from
3. Archambault, F. A., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (Research Monograph 93102). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
4. Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Ihrig, D., & Forstadt, L. (2006). Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 283-294.
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognition theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Battin-Pearson, S., Newcomb, M. D., Abbott, R. D., Hill, K. G., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (2000). Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 568-582.
8. Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hébert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224-235.
9. Baum, S., Ma, J., & Payea, K. (2010). Education pays 2010: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Retrieved from
10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Chan, L. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 184-193.
12. Colangelo, N. (2003). Counseling gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 373-387). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
15. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16. Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122-140). New York: The Guilford Press.
17. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
18. Emerick . L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140-146.
19. Fredricks, J. A., Alfeld, C., & Eccles, J. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and nonacademic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 18-30.
20. Greene, M. (2001). Environmental perceptions. [CD-ROM]. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
21. Heacox, D. (1991). Up from underachievement: How teachers, students, and parents can work together to promote student success. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.
22. Kleinert, J. O., Harrison, E. M., Fisher, T. L., & Kleinert, H. L. (2010). "I can" and I did"-Self-advocacy for young students with developmental disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(2), 16-28.
23. Lau, K.-L., & Chen, D. W. (2001). Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: Do different methods select different underachievers? Educational Studies, 27, 187-200.
24. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
25. Lyman, R. D., Prentice-Dunn, S., Wilson, D. R., & Bonfilio, S. A. (1984). The effect of success or failure on self-efficacy and task persistence of conduct-disordered children. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 516-519.
26. Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1995). Could do better. New York: Wiley & Sons.
27. Matthews, M. S., & McBee, M. T. (2007). School factors and the underachievement of gifted students in a talent search summer program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 167-181.
28. McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults? Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
29. McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). The SAAS-R: A new instrument to identify academically able students who underachieve. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 414-429.
30. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Molenda, M., & Pershing, J. A. (2004). The strategic impact model: An integrative approach to performance improvement and instructional systems design. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 48(2), 26-32.
32. Morisano, D., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Can personal goal setting tap the potential of the gifted underachiever. Roeper Review, 32, 249-258.
33. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3-53.
34. Peterson, J. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 22, 217-224.
35. Peterson, J. S. (2001). Successful adults who were once adolescent underachievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 236-250.
36. Peterson, J. S. (2002). A longitudinal study of post-high-school development in gifted individuals at risk for poor educational outcomes. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 6-18.
37. Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 399-406.
38. Rafferty, L. A. (2010). Step-by-step: Teaching students to self-monitor. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(2), 50-59.
39. Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreiber, F., Richards, S., Jacobs, J., et al. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 315-338.
40. Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Díaz, E. P., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school (Research Monograph 95120). Storrs, : University of Connecticut, National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented.
41. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J., Caillard, F., Hébert, T., Plucker, J., et al. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January? The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
42. Renzulli, J. S., Reid, B. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (1991). Setting an agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
43. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
44. Rimm, S. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks.
45. Rimm, S. (2008). Why bright kids get poor grades-and what you can do about it. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
46. Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 261-288.
47. Ruban, L., & Reis, S. M. (2006). Patterns of self-regulation: Patterns of self-regulatory strategy use among low-achieving and high-achieving university students. Roeper Review, 28, 148-156.
48. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
49. Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
50. Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (1999, November). Academic challenge: Are we barking up the wrong tree? Paper presented at the 46th Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children, Albuquerque, NM.
51. Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
52. Simonsen, B., & Little, C. (2011). Single subject research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 158-162.
53. Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6, 261-271.
54. Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever. New York: Teacher College Press.
55. Trostel, P. A. (2007). The fiscal impact of college attainment. Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Secondary Education Working Paper. Retrieved from
56. VanTassel-Baska, J. & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for serving gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory Into Practice, 44, 211-217.
57. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
58. Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X. Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms (Research Monograph 93104). Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
59. Whiting, G. W. (2009). The Scholar Identity Institute: Guiding Darnel and other Black males. Gifted Child Today, 32(4), 53-56.
60. Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
61. Zientek, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2010). Using commonality analysis to quantify contributions that self-efficacy and motivational factors make in mathematics performance. Research in the Schools, 17, 1-11.
62. Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner, S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners: Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.