A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 595-601

  Kelly, Nicholas Michael ^a   Rodgers, Colin ^a   Patterson, Neil ^a   Jacob, Sudheer George ^a   Mainie, Inder ^b  

^a ANTRIM AREA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b BELFAST CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bowel cancer screening; bowel preparation; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer

Indexed keywords

CITRAMAG; GOLYTELY; MACROGOL; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; MOVIPREP; SENNOSIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DOSE COMPARISON; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATHARTICS; CITRIC ACID; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAXATIVES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENNA EXTRACT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863774705     PISSN: 01920790     EISSN: 15392031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Mortality Statistics. Deaths Registered in 2007. Review of the National Statistician on deaths in England and Wales. A National Statistics publication. Crown copyright. ISSN 1757-1375.
2. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472-1477. doi:10.1016/ 0140-6736(96)03386-7.
3. Kronberg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised trial of screening of colorectal cancer by screening with faecal occult blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467-1471. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(96)03430-7.
4. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for faecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Eng J Med. 1993; 328:1365-1371. doi:10.1056/NEJM199305133281901.
5. Scholefield JH, Moss S, Sufi F, et al. Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2002;50:840-844. doi:10.1136/gut.50.6.840.
6. UK Cancer Screening Pilot Group. Results of the first round of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2004;329:133. doi:10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C.
7. Chilton A, Rutter M. Colonoscopy Quality Guidelines. NHS BCSP Publication No.6. 2011. ISBN 978-1-84463-077-6.
8. Bowels CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: Are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
9. Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438-442. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.12.003.
10. Selehi S, Leung E, Wong L. Factors affecting outcomes in colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2008;31:56-63. doi:10.1097/ 1.SGA.0000310937.85046.91.
11. Zuber-Jerger I, Endlicher E, Gelbmann CM. Factors affecting cecal and ileal intubation time in colonoscopy. Med Klin (Munich). 2008;103:477-481. doi:10.1007/s00063-008-1071-6.
12. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, et al. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:600-605. doi:10.1067/mge.2000.109802.
13. Bitoun A, Ponchon T, Barthet M, et al. Results of a prospective randomised multicentre controlled trial comparing a new 2-L ascorbic acid plus polyethylene glycol and electrolyte solution vs. sodium phosphate solution in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Ali P Ther. 2006;24:1631-1642. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03167.
14. Di Febo G, Gizzi G, Calo G, et al. Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Iso-Giuliani) with a standard preparation for colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Endoscopy. 1990;22:214-216. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1012851.
15. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:792-809. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0536-z
16. Golub RW, Kerner BA, Wise WE Jr, et al. Colonoscopic bowel preparations-which one? A blinded, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:594-599 doi:10.1007/BF02054117.
17. Hookey LC, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: A prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20:101-105.
18. Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: An underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389-3396. doi:10.1681/ SN.2005050496.
19. Ori Y, Herman M, Tobar A, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy-an emerging threat. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336:309-314. doi:10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318167410c
20. Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: Efficacy, tolerability and safety-A Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20:699-710.
21. Parente F, Marino B, Crosta C. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy in the era of mass screening for colorectal cancer: A practical approach. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:87-95. doi:10.1016/ .dld.2008.06.005.
22. Lichtenstein G. Bowel Preparations for Colonscopy: A Review Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009. Jan 1;66(1): 27-37. doi:10.2146/ jhp080084.
23. Ker TS. Prospective comparison of three bowel preparation regimens: fleet phosphosoda, two-litre and four-litre electrolyte lavage solutions. Am Surg. 2008;74:1030-1032.
24. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, et al. Randomised trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG +electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterolo. 2008;103:883-893. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241. 2007.01708.x.
25. Byrne MF. The curse of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastro. 2002;97:1587-1590. doi:10.1111/ 1572-0241.2002.05855.x.
26. Varughese S, Kumar AR, George A, et al. Morning-only onegallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: A randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2368-2374.