Small intestinal tumors: Diagnostic accuracy of enhanced multi-detector CT virtual endoscopy

Abdominal Imaging

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 465-474

  Su, Xuejuan ^a   Ge, Yinghui ^a   Liang, Baosong ^a   Wu, Minghui ^a   Guo, Ying ^a   Ma, Bo ^a   Li, Jianying ^b  

^a HENAN PROVINCIAL PEOPLE'S HOSPITAL   (China)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (China)

Author keywords

Intestine; Small; Spiral computed; Tomography; Tumor; Virtual endoscopy

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL CARCINOMA; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR; HEMANGIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTESTINE LYMPHOMA; INTESTINE POLYP; INTESTINE RADIOGRAPHY; LIPOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY VIRTUAL ENDOSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMALL INTESTINE TUMOR; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL NEOPLASMS; IOHEXOL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84863722216     PISSN: 09428925     EISSN: 14320509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-011-9776-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Romano S, De Lutio E, Rollandi GA, et al. (2005) Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumour detection. Eur Radiol 15:1178-1183
2. Sailer J, Zacherl J, Schima W (2007) MDCT of small bowel tumours. Cancer Imaging 7:224-233
3. Masselli G, Polettini E, Casciani E, et al. (2009) Small-bowel neoplasms: prospective evaluation of MR enteroclysis. Radiology 251:743-750
4. Van Weyenberg SJ, Meijerink MR, Jacobs MA, et al. (2010) MR enteroclysis in the diagnosis of small-bowel neoplasms. Radiology 254:765-773
5. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Belcari A, et al. (2005) Multidetector CT of the small bowel: evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution. Radiol Med 109:516-526
6. Delabrousse E, Destrumelle N, Brunelle S, et al. (2003) CT of small bowel obstruction in adults. Abdom Imaging 28:257-266
7. Reittner P, Goritschnig T, Petritsch W, et al. (2002) Multiplanar spiral CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease using a negative oral contrast material: initial results of a noninvasive imaging approach. Eur Radiol 12:2253-2257
8. Rajesh A, Maglinte DD (2006) Multislice CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications. Clin Radiol 61:31-39
9. Schmidt S, Felley C, Meuwly JY, Schnyder P, Denys A (2006) CT enteroclysis: technique and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 16:648-660
10. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC (2007) CT enteroclysis: techniques and applications. Radiol Clin North Am 45:289-301
11. Doerfler OC, Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ, Reittner P, et al. (2003) Helical CT of the small bowel with an alternative oral contrast material in patients with Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging 28: 313-318
12. Ramsay DW, Markham DH, Morgan B, Rodgers PM, Liddicoat AJ (2001) The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media. Clin Radiol 56:670-673
13. Zhang LH, Zhang SZ, Hu HJ, et al. (2005) Multi-detector CT enterography with iso-osmotic mannitol as oral contrast for detecting small bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 11:2324-2329
14. Thompson SE, Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RL, McNicholas MM, Prassopoulos P (1999) Abdominal helical CT: milk as a lowattenuation oral contrast agent. Radiology 211:870-875
15. Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH (2008) Costeffectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1307-1313
16. Horton KM, Eng J, Fishman EK (2000) Normal enhancement of the small bowel: evaluation with spiral CT. J Compute Assist Tomogr 24:67-71
17. Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 12:504-524
18. Landeras LA, Aslam R, Yee J (2007) Virtual colonoscopy: technique and accuracy. Radiol Clin North Am 45:333-345
19. Rogalla P, Werner-Rustner M, Huitema A, et al. (1998) Virtual endoscopy of the small bowel: phantom study and preliminary clinical results. Eur Radiol 8:563-567
20. Endo K, Utano K, Togashi K, et al. (2010) Virtual enteroscopy using air as the contrast material: a preliminary feasibility study. Dig Endosc 22:205-210
21. Boudiaf M, Jaff A, Soyer P, et al. (2004) Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients. Radiology 233:338-344
22. Maglinte DD, Sandrasegaran K, Lappas JC, Chiorean M (2007) CT Enteroclysis. Radiology 245:661-671
23. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. (2004) Clinical outcomes of double-balloon enteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:1010-1016
24. Jonnalagdda S, Prakash C (2003) Intestinal Strictures can impede wireless capsule enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 57:418-420
25. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small-bowel disease comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717-725
26. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, et al. (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of "sign-bysign" correlation. Eur Radiol 13:1303-1311
27. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. (2004) Assessment of Crohn's disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 14:1017-1024
28. Wiarda BM, Kuipers EJ, Houdijk LP, Tuynman HA (2005) MR enteroclysis: imaging technique of choice in diagnosis of small bowel diseases. Dig Dis Sci 50:1036-1040
29. Gölder SK, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E, et al. (2006) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:97-104
30. Torkzad MR, Vargas R, Tanaka C, Blomqvist L (2007) Value of cine MRI for better visualization of the proximal small bowel in normal individuals. Eur Radiol 17:2964-2968
31. Buhmann-Kirchhoff S, Lang R, Kirchhoff C, et al. (2008) Functional cine MR imaging for the detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: method and surgical correlation. Eur Radiol 18:1215-1223
32. Castiglione F, Rispo A, Cozzolino A, et al. (2007) Bowel sonography in adult celiac disease: diagnostic accuracy and ultrasonographic features. Abdom Imaging 32:73-77
33. Maconi G, Radice E, Greco S, Bezzio C, Bianchi Porro G (2007) Transient small-bowel intussusceptions in adults: significance of ultrasonographic detection. Clin Radiol 62:792-797
34. Bozkurt T, Richter F, Lux G (1994) Ultrasonography as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflammatory disease and tumours of the small intestine and large bowel. J Clin Ultrasound 22:85-91
35. Odegaard S, Nesje LB, Hausken T, et al. (2000) Intraluminal sonography in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases. Ultraschall Med 21:47-58
36. Nylund K, Ødegaard S, Hausken T, et al. (2009) Sonography of the small intestine. World J Gastroenterol 15:1319-1330
37. Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, et al. (2005) Demetri GD; GIST consensus meeting panelists. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the Auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol 16:566-578
38. Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Reichelderfer M, Weichert JP (2006) Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 31:48-53