Social familiarity modulates group living and foraging behaviour of juvenile predatory mites

Naturwissenschaften

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 303-311

  Strodl, Markus A ^a   Schausberger, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Association behaviour; Familiarity; Foraging; Life history; Limited attention; Phytoseiidae

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY SIZE; CONSPECIFIC; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FAMILIARITY; FOOD SUPPLY; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; GROUP BEHAVIOR; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; JUVENILE; LARVA; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATURATION; MITE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; MITE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; MITES; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ACARI; ANIMALIA; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS;

EID: 84863719596     PISSN: 00281042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0903-7     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alcock J (2005) Behavioral adaptations for survival. In: Alcock J (ed) Animal behavior: an evolutionary approach, 8th edn. Sinauer, Massachusetts, pp 175-187
2. Beckerman A, Benton TG, Ranta E, Kaitala V, Lundberg P (2002) Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. Trends Ecol Evol 17:263-269. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02469-2 (Pubitemid 34518295)
3. Beletsky LD, Orians GH (1989) Familiar neighbors enhance breeding success in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7933-7936. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.20.7933
4. Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF (1995) Familiarity and shoal cohesion in fathead minnows (Pimephalespromelas): implications for anti-predator behaviour. Can J Zool 73:955-960.doi:10.1139/z95-111 (Pubitemid 26448894)
5. Danchin É, Giraldeau L-A, Wagner RH (2008) Animal aggregation:hypotheses and controversies. In: Danchin É, Giraldeau L-A, Cézilly F (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary perspective on behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 503-545
6. Delbarco-Trillo J, McPhee ME, Johnston RE (2009) Nonagonistic familiarity decreases aggression in male Turkish hamsters, Mesocricetus brandti. Anim Behav 77:389-393. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.012
7. Dukas R (2002) Behavioural and ecological consequences of limited attention. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B357:1539-1547. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1063 (Pubitemid 35442098)
8. Foster WA, Treherne JE (1981) Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293:466-467
9. Giraldeau LA (2008) Solitary foraging strategies. In: Danchin E, Giraldeau L-A, Cézilly F (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary perspective on behaviour. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 233-255. doi:10.1038/293466a0
10. Griffiths SW, Brockmark S, Höjesjö J, Johnsson JI (2004) Coping with divided attention: the advantage of familiarity. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:695-699. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2648 (Pubitemid 38437938)
11. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1-52
12. Hawley TJ (2009) The ecological significance and incidence of intraguild predation and cannibalism among anurans in ephemeral tropical pools. Copeia 2009:748-757
13. Höjesjö J, Johnsson JI, Pettersson E, Järvi T (1998) The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behaviour in sea trout (Salmo trutta). Behav Ecol 9:445-451. doi:10.1093/beheco/9.5.445 (Pubitemid 28465944)
14. Illius AW, Tolkamp BJ, Yearsley J (2002) The evolution of the control of food intake. Proc Nutr Soc 61:465-472. doi:10.1079/PNS2002179 (Pubitemid 36069935)
15. Indermaur L, Schmidt BR, Tockner K, Schaub M (2010) Spatial variation in abiotic and biotic factors in a floodplain determine anuran body size and growth rate at metamorphosis. Oecologia 163:637-649. doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1586-4
16. Koedijk R, Folkvord A, Foss A, Pittman K, Stefansson SO, Handeland S, Imsland AK (2010) The influence of first feeding diet on the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua phenotype: survival, development andlong-term consequences for growth. J Fish Biol 77:1-19. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02652.x
17. Komdeur J, Richardson DS, Burke T (2004) Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not on genetic relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:963-969. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2665 (Pubitemid 38586419)
18. Lawson-Balagbo LM, Gondim MGC Jr, De Moraes GJ, Hanna R, Schausberger P (2008) Compatibility of the predatory mites Neoseiulus paspalivorus and Proctolaelaps bickleyi, candidate biocontrol agents of the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis: spatial niche use and intraguild predation. Exp Appl Acarol 45:1-13. doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9156-8
19. Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fenn 41:729-745 (Pubitemid 40113085)
20. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2001) Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol 16:254-260. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02124-3 (Pubitemid 32288153)
21. Monaghan P (2008) Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 363:1635-1645. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.0011 (Pubitemid 351441051)
22. Nylin S, Gotthard K (1998) Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol 43:63-83. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63 (Pubitemid 28091229)
23. Palphramand KL, White PCL (2007) Badgers, Meles meles, discriminate between neighbour, alien and selfscent. Anim Behav 74:429-436. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.10.026 (Pubitemid 47404520)
24. Plaistow SJ, Lapsley CT, Benton TG (2006) Context-dependent intergenerational effects: the interaction between past and present environments and its effect on population dynamics. Am Nat 167:206-215. doi:10.1086/499380 (Pubitemid 43271174)
25. Sabelis MW (1985) Development. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 43-53
26. Schausberger P (1997) Inter- and intraspecific predation on immatures by adult females in Euseius finlandicus, Typhlodromus pyri and Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 21:131-150. doi:10.1023/A: 1018478418010
27. Schausberger P (2003) Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 29:173-191. doi:10.1023/A:1025839206394 (Pubitemid 38105918)
28. Schausberger P (2004) Ontogenetic isolation favours sibling cannibalism in mites. Anim Behav 67:1031-1035. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.006 (Pubitemid 38851870)
29. Schausberger P (2005) The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis manipulates imprinting among offspring through egg placement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:53-59. doi:10.1007/s00265-004-0898-y (Pubitemid 40600035)
30. Schausberger P (2007) Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:119-125. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0444-9 (Pubitemid 47568639)
31. Schausberger P, Croft BA (1999) Activity, feeding, and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol 28:322-329 (Pubitemid 29195020)
32. Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Kin recognition and larval cannibalism by adult females in specialist predaceous mites. Anim Behav 61:459-464. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1611 (Pubitemid 32533004)
33. Šešlija D, Tucić N (2003) Selection for developmental time in bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus): correlated responses for other life history traits and genetic architecture of line differentiation. Entomol Exp Appl 106:19-35. doi:10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00007. x (Pubitemid 36639622)
34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research.WH Freeman, New York
35. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
36. Stearns SC (2000) Life history evolution: successes, limitations, and prospects. Naturwissenschaften 87:476-486. doi:10.1007/s001140050763
37. Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
38. Utne-Palm AC, Hart PJB (2000) The effects of familiarity on competitive interactions between threespine sticklebacks. Oikos 91:225-232. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910203.x (Pubitemid 32122521)
39. Van der Linde K, Sevenster JG (2006) Local adaptation of developmental time and starvation resistance in eight Drosophila species of the Philippines. Biol J Linn Soc 87:115-125. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00560.x
40. Vanas V, Enigl M, Walzer A, Schausberger P (2006) The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis adjustspatch-leaving to own and progeny prey needs. Exp Appl Acarol 39:1-11. doi:10.1007/s10493-006-0024-0
41. Waldman B (1988) The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:54-571. doi:0.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.002551
42. Walzer A, Schausberger P (2011) Sex-specific developmental plasticity of generalist and specialist predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in response to food stress. Biol J Linn Soc 102:650-660.doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01593.x
43. Zhang Z-Q, Sanderson JP (1992) Short distance location of spider mite colonies by three predatory mites (Acari, Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae)- predator responses to prey-associated and predatorassociated stimuli. Environ Entomol 21:801-807
44. Zwaan BJ, Bijlsma R, Hoekstra RF (1995) Artificial selection for developmental time in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to the evolution of aging: direct and correlated responses. Evolution 49:635-648 (Pubitemid 26450254)