Tools for thinking

Language and Bilingual Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 131-139

  Tversky, Barbara ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863627260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Anderson, N. H., & Hubert, S. (1963). Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 379-391.
2. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation, Volume 8 (pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
3. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-22.
4. Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L., & Phillips, W. (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61-78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Chatterjee, A. (2001). Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 55-61.
6. Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in digit span of preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 150-158.
7. Chokron, S., & De Agostini, M. (2000). Reading habits influence aesthetic preference. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 45-49.
8. Corter, J. E., Rho, Y-J, Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., & Tversky, B. (2009). Bugs and biases: Diagnosing misconceptions in the understanding of diagrams. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 756-761). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
9. Deno, S. L., Johnson, P., & Jenkins, J. R. (1968). Associative similarity of words and pictures. AV Communication Review, 16, 280-286.
10. Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L, Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language. Cognition, 108, 810-824.
11. Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W-C., Ozyurek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events non-verbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 9163-9168.
12. Goldschmidt, G. (1994). On visual design thinking: The vis kids of architecture. Design Studies, 15, 158-174.
13. Gordon, P. (2004). Numerical cognition without words. Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496-499.
14. Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A crosslinguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200.
15. Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261-283). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Gunderson, E. A., Rowe, M. L., & Pruden, S. (2009). Preschoolers' number and spatial knowledge: Relation to early parent-child interactions. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Denver, Colorado, April 2-4.
17. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Space and language (pp. 109-169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Levinson, S. C., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. M., & Rasch, B. H. (2002). Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition, 84, 155-188.
20. Li, P., Dunham, Y., & Carey, S. (2008). Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 487-524.
21. Li, P., & Gleitman, L. (2002). Turning the tables: Spatial language and spatial cognition. Cognition, 83, 265-294.
22. Lowenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 315-353.
23. Lucy, J. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lucy, J., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In M. Bowerman & S. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 257-283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Lucy, J. A., & Gaskins, S. (2003). Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the issues of language and thought (pp. 465-492). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Maass, A., Pagani, D., & Berta, E. (2007). How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition, 25, 833-852.
27. Markman, E. M., & Hutchinson, J. E. (1984). Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic vs. thematic relations. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 1-27.
28. Morikawa, K., & McBeath, M. (1992). Lateral motion bias associated with reading direction. Vision Research, 32, 1137-1141.
29. Morrison, J. B., & Tversky, B. (2005). Bodies and their parts. Memory and Cognition, 33, 696-709.
30. Nachson, I. (1985). Directional preferences in perception of visual stimuli. International Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 161-174.
31. Nickerson, J. V., Corter, J. E., Tversky, B., Zahner, D., & Rho, Y-J. (2008). The spatial nature of thought: Understanding information systems design through diagrams. In R. Boland, M. Limayem, & B. Pentland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Information Systems. Paris: Association for Information Systems.
32. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33. Otto, W. (1962). The differential effects of verbal and pictorial representations of stimuli upon responses. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 192-196.
34. Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., & Shapiro, L. (2002). Squaring the circle: The cultural relativity of good shape. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 2, 29-53.
35. Roberson, D., Davies, I., & Davidoff, J. (2000). Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a Stone-Age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 369-398.
36. Santiago, J., Román, A., Ouellet, M., Rodríguez, N., & Pérez-Azor, P. (2010). In hindsight, life flows from left to right. Psychological Research, 74(1), 59-70. doi 10.1007/s00426-008-0220-0
37. Sapir, E. (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
38. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Harper Collins.
39. Schooler, J. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
40. Singer, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Students learn when their teachers' gesture and speech differ. Psychological Science, 16, 85-89.
41. Slobin, D. (1996). From 'thought and language' to 'thinking for speaking.' In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Stigler, J. (1983). 'Mental abacus': The effect of abacus training on Chinese children's mental calculation. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 145-176.
43. Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What architects and students perceive in their sketches: A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385-403.
44. Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 515-557.
46. Vaid, J., & Singh, M. (1989). Asymmetries in the perception of facial effects: Is there an influence of reading habits? Neuropsychologia, 27, 1277-1286.
47. Valenzano, L. Alibali, M. W., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers' gestures facilitate students' learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187-204.
48. Whorf, B. L. (1956). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134-159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Wicker, F. (1970). Continuous restricted associations to pictorial and verbal items. AV Communication Review, 18, 431-439.
50. Winn, W. (1976). The structure of multiple free associations to words, black-andwhite pictures and color pictures. AV Communication Review, 24, 273-293.
51. Zacks, J., Tversky, B., & Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 29-58.
52. Zhang, J. J., & Norman, D. A. (1995). A representational analysis of numeration systems. Cognition, 57, 271-295.