Evaluation of a cone beam CT artefact reduction algorithm

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 422-428

  Bechara, B ^a   McMahan, C A ^a   Geha, H ^a   Noujeim, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Artefact; Cone beam computed tomography; Noise

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; METALS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84863621898     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/43691321     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245-248.
2. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: "low-dose cone-beam" CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003;29:773-775. (Pubitemid 38650802)
3. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-971.
4. Chen Q, Liu DG, Zhang G, Ma XC. Relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2009;44:217-221.
5. Bianchi S, Anglesio S, Castellano S, Rizzi L, Ragona R. Absorbed dose and risk in implant planning: comparison between spiral CT and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:S28.
6. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-417. (Pubitemid 41659395)
7. Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim JS. Common orthodontic appliances cause artefacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007;35:850-857.
8. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Müller S, Mueller-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:198-203. (Pubitemid 46999234)
9. Webber RL, Tzukert A, Ruttimann. The effects of beam hardening on digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1989;24:53-58. (Pubitemid 19071638)
10. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artefacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679-1691.
11. Niu T, Sun M, Star-Lack J, Gao H, Fa Q, Zhu L. Shading correction for on-board cone-beam CT in radiation therapy using planning MDCT images. Med Phys 2010;37:5395-5406.
12. Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). Med Phys 2000;27:1903-1914. (Pubitemid 30666365)
13. Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of X-ray scatter. Med Phys 2001;28:220-231. (Pubitemid 32165760)
14. Wiegert J, Bertram M, Schaefer D, Conrads N, Timmer J, Aach T, et al. Performance of standard fluoroscopy antiscatter grids in flat-detector-based cone-beam CT. Proc SPIE Medical Imaging 2004;5368:67-68.
15. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Bakhtiar B, Richard S, Jaffray DA. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors. Med Phys 2004;31:3506-3520. (Pubitemid 40065003)
16. Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys 2001;28:469-474. (Pubitemid 32323298)
17. Seibert JA, Boone JM. X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution. Med Phys 1988;15:567-575.
18. Spies L, Evans PM, Partridge M, Hansen VN, Bortfeld T. Direct measurement and analytical modeling of scatter in portal imaging. Med Phys 2000;27:462-471. (Pubitemid 30171794)
19. Spies L, Ebert M, Groh BA, Hesse BM, Bortfeld T. Correction of scatter in megavoltage cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:821-33. (Pubitemid 32218865)
20. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, et al. New algorithm for metal artefact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003;38:769-775. (Pubitemid 37444949)
21. Vande Berg B, Malghem J, Maldague B, Lecouvet F. Multidetector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:470-479.
22. Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, Magid D, Walker PS. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artefacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:236-241. (Pubitemid 18079014)
23. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artefacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;164:576-577. (Pubitemid 17097989)
24. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Brooker AF, Weiss P, Siegelman SS. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 1986;160:675-81. (Pubitemid 16044035)
25. White DR, Martin RJ, Darlison R. Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes. Br J Radiol 1977;50:814-21. (Pubitemid 8212222)
26. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY; 1998.
27. Bechara BB, Moore WS, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Metal artefact reduction with cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:248-253.
28. Schulze RK, Berndt D, d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artefacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:100-7.