Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: An in vitro study

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 248-253

  Bechara, Boulos ^a   Moore, W S ^a   McMahan, C A ^a   Noujeim, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Artefact; Cone beam computed tomography; Noise

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; EPOXY RESIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BONE PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL ALLOYS; EPOXY RESINS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84858146088     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/80899839     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-971.
2. Chen Q, Liu DG, Zhang G, Ma XC. Relationship between the impacted mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2009;44:217-221.
3. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245-248.
4. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: "low-dose cone-beam" CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003;29:773-775. (Pubitemid 38650802)
5. Bianchi S, Anglesio S, Castellano S, Rizzi L, Ragona R. Absorbed doses and risk in implant planning: comparison between spiral CT and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:S28.
6. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-417. (Pubitemid 41659395)
7. Sanders MA, Hoyjberg C, Chu CB, Leggitt VL, Kim JS. Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images. J Calif Dent Assoc 2007;35:850-857.
8. Draenert FG, Coppenrath E, Herzog P, Müller S, Mueller-Lisse UG. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:198-203. (Pubitemid 46999234)
9. Webber RL, Tzukert A, Ruttimann U. The effects of beam hardening on digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontal Res 1989;24:53-58. (Pubitemid 19071638)
10. Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679-1691.
11. Vande Berg B, Malghem J, Maldague B, Lecouvet F. Multidetector CT imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient with metal hardware. Eur J Radiol 2006;60:470-479.
12. Mahnken AH, Raupach R, Wildberger JE, Jung B, Heussen N, Flohr TG, et al. New algorithm for metal artifact reduction in computed tomography: in vitro and in vivo evaluation after total hip replacement. Invest Radiol 2003;38:769-775. (Pubitemid 37444949)
13. Robertson DD, Weiss PJ, Fishman EK, Magid D, Walker PS. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:236-241. (Pubitemid 18079014)
14. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;164:576-577. (Pubitemid 17097989)
15. Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Brooker AF, Weiss P, Siegelman SS. Metallic hip implants: CT with multiplanar reconstruction. Radiology 1986;160:675-681. (Pubitemid 16044035)
16. White DR, Martin RJ, Darlison R. Epoxy resin based tissue substitutes. Br Dent J Radiol 1977;50:814-821. (Pubitemid 8212222)
17. Draper NR, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. 3rd edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
18. Haramati N, Staron RB, Mazel-Sperling K, Freeman K, Nickoloff EL, Barax C, et al. CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994;18:429-434. (Pubitemid 24370219)
19. Glover GH, Pelc NJ. An algorithm for the reduction of metal clip artifacts in CT reconstructions. Med Phys 1981;8:799-807. (Pubitemid 12249662)
20. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology 1987;164:576-577. (Pubitemid 17097989)
21. Zhao S, Robertson DD, Wang G, Whiting B, Bae KT. X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using wavelets: an application for imaging total hip prostheses. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000;19:1238-1247.
22. Wang G, Snyder DL, O'Sullivan JA, Vannier MW. Iterative deblurring for CT metal artifact reduction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996;1:657-664. (Pubitemid 126780355)
23. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1088-1095.
24. Kim S, Yoo S, Yin FF, Samei E, Yoshizumi T. Kilovoltage conebeam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. Med Phys 2010;37:3648-3659.